Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Merging files with common IDs without JOIN Post 302824603 by balajesuri on Friday 21st of June 2013 06:58:52 AM
Old 06-21-2013
Code:
join -a1 -o0 1.2 1.3 2.2 -e0 file1 file2

This User Gave Thanks to balajesuri For This Post:
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Merging two files with a common column

Hi, I have two files file1 and file2. I have to merge the columns of those two files into file3 based on common column of two files. To be simple. file1: Row-id name1 13456 Rahul 16789 Vishal 18901 Karan file2 : Row-id place 18901 Mumbai ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: manneni prakash
2 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Merging 2 files based on a common column

Hi All, I do have 2 files file 1 has 4 tab delimited columns 234 a c dfgyu 294 b g fih 302 c h jzh 328 z c san 597 f g son File 2 has 2 tab delimted columns 234 23 302 24 597 24 I want to merge file 2 with file 1 based on the data common in both files which is the first column so... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Lucky Ali
6 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

join files based on a common field

Hi experts, Would you please help me with this? I have several files and I need to join the forth field of them based on the common first field. here's an example... first file: 280346 39.88 -75.08 547.8 280690 39.23 -74.83 538.7 280729 40.83 -75.08 499.2 280907 40.9 -74.4 507.8... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: GoldenFire
5 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Merge two files with common IDs but unequal number of rows

Hi, I have two files that I would like to merge and think that there should be a solution using awk. The files look something like this: file 1 IDX1 IDY1 IDX2 IDY2 IDX3 IDY3 file 2 IDY1 dataA data1 IDY2 dataB data2 IDY3 dataC data3 Desired output IDX1 IDY1 dataA data1 IDX2 ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: katie8856
5 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

how to join two files using "Join" command with one common field in this problem?

file1: Toronto:12439755:1076359:July 1, 1867:6 Quebec City:7560592:1542056:July 1, 1867:5 Halifax:938134:55284:July 1, 1867:4 Fredericton:751400:72908:July 1, 1867:3 Winnipeg:1170300:647797:July 15, 1870:7 Victoria:4168123:944735:July 20, 1871:10 Charlottetown:137900:5660:July 1, 1873:2... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mindfreak
2 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

How to use the the join command to join multiple files by a common column

Hi, I have 20 tab delimited text files that have a common column (column 1). The files are named GSM1.txt through GSM20.txt. Each file has 3 columns (2 other columns in addition to the first common column). I want to write a script to join the files by the first common column so that in the... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: evelibertine
5 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Join two files with common and range identifiers

I have a problem joining two files. The first file abc.txt has 10k lines and has lots of fields but two fields fff1 and ppp1 to merge by. The second file xyz.txt is a master file with 1k lines and lots of fields but three fields to merge by fff1; rrr1 and qqq1. The two files need to be merged... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: cfiles2012
9 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Merging 2 text files when there is a common time stamp column in them

Dear Unix experts and users I have 2 kinds of files like below, of which I need to merge them in the order of time. File1: Date_Time Context D1 D2 04/19/2013_23:48:54.819 ABCD x x 04/19/2013_23:48:55.307 ABCD x x 04/19/2013_23:48:55.823 ABCD x ... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: ks_reddy
7 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

How to join 2 .txt files based on a common column?

Hi all, I'm trying to join two .txt file tab delimitated based on a common column. File 1 transcript_id gene_id length effective_length expected_count TPM FPKM IsoPct comp1000201_c0_seq1 comp1000201_c0 337 183.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 comp1000297_c0_seq1 ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: alisrpp
1 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Merging two files without any common pattern

Hi I have file1 as IJU_NSOMOW; SOWWOD_TWUIQ; and file2 as how are you?; fine there; Now my problem is i need the output file as IJU_NSOMOW; how are you?; SOWWOD_TWUIQ; fine there; (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Priya Amaresh
2 Replies
GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)						    Git Manual							 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)

NAME
git-merge-base - Find as good common ancestors as possible for a merge SYNOPSIS
git merge-base [-a|--all] <commit> <commit>... git merge-base [-a|--all] --octopus <commit>... git merge-base --is-ancestor <commit> <commit> git merge-base --independent <commit>... DESCRIPTION
git merge-base finds best common ancestor(s) between two commits to use in a three-way merge. One common ancestor is better than another common ancestor if the latter is an ancestor of the former. A common ancestor that does not have any better common ancestor is a best common ancestor, i.e. a merge base. Note that there can be more than one merge base for a pair of commits. OPERATION MODE
As the most common special case, specifying only two commits on the command line means computing the merge base between the given two commits. More generally, among the two commits to compute the merge base from, one is specified by the first commit argument on the command line; the other commit is a (possibly hypothetical) commit that is a merge across all the remaining commits on the command line. As a consequence, the merge base is not necessarily contained in each of the commit arguments if more than two commits are specified. This is different from git-show-branch(1) when used with the --merge-base option. --octopus Compute the best common ancestors of all supplied commits, in preparation for an n-way merge. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --merge-base. --independent Instead of printing merge bases, print a minimal subset of the supplied commits with the same ancestors. In other words, among the commits given, list those which cannot be reached from any other. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --independent. --is-ancestor Check if the first <commit> is an ancestor of the second <commit>, and exit with status 0 if true, or with status 1 if not. Errors are signaled by a non-zero status that is not 1. OPTIONS
-a, --all Output all merge bases for the commits, instead of just one. DISCUSSION
Given two commits A and B, git merge-base A B will output a commit which is reachable from both A and B through the parent relationship. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---B / ---o---1---o---o---o---A the merge base between A and B is 1. Given three commits A, B and C, git merge-base A B C will compute the merge base between A and a hypothetical commit M, which is a merge between B and C. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---o---C / / o---o---o---B / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A the result of git merge-base A B C is 1. This is because the equivalent topology with a merge commit M between B and C is: o---o---o---o---o / / o---o---o---o---M / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A and the result of git merge-base A M is 1. Commit 2 is also a common ancestor between A and M, but 1 is a better common ancestor, because 2 is an ancestor of 1. Hence, 2 is not a merge base. The result of git merge-base --octopus A B C is 2, because 2 is the best common ancestor of all commits. When the history involves criss-cross merges, there can be more than one best common ancestor for two commits. For example, with this topology: ---1---o---A / X / ---2---o---o---B both 1 and 2 are merge-bases of A and B. Neither one is better than the other (both are best merge bases). When the --all option is not given, it is unspecified which best one is output. A common idiom to check "fast-forward-ness" between two commits A and B is (or at least used to be) to compute the merge base between A and B, and check if it is the same as A, in which case, A is an ancestor of B. You will see this idiom used often in older scripts. A=$(git rev-parse --verify A) if test "$A" = "$(git merge-base A B)" then ... A is an ancestor of B ... fi In modern git, you can say this in a more direct way: if git merge-base --is-ancestor A B then ... A is an ancestor of B ... fi instead. SEE ALSO
git-rev-list(1), git-show-branch(1), git-merge(1) GIT
Part of the git(1) suite Git 1.8.5.3 01/14/2014 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy