Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting awk question ? set 2 variables by matching fields Post 302804011 by charlieglen on Tuesday 7th of May 2013 11:56:52 PM
Old 05-08-2013
awk question ? set 2 variables by matching fields

Hello,
I'm trying to get the TOP and BASE numbers printed out
File looks like this:

Code:
2300  CAR   # 2300 is the TOP
2310  CAR
2335  CAR
2455  CAR   # 2455 is the BASE
1000  MOTOR  # 2455 will become this TOP
2000  MOTOR  
3000  MOTOR
4000  MOTOR   # 4000 is the BASE
2345  BIKE     # 4000 becomes this TOP
2347  BIKE     # 2347 is the BASE

The output needs to READ like this:

Code:
CAR        2300 2455
MOTOR  2455 4000
BIKE        4000 2347

please let me know if this needs more explanation,
my files are 500,000 ROWS of data in this format.

Thanks in advance for your Help.

Last edited by Scott; 05-08-2013 at 03:00 AM.. Reason: Please use code tags for code and data
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

AWK Matching Fields and Combining Files

Hello! I am writing a program to run through two large lists of data (~300,000 rows), find where rows in one file match another, and combine them based on matching fields. Due to the large file sizes, I'm guessing AWK will be the most efficient way to do this. Overall, the input and output I'm... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Michelangelo
5 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Awk - Compare fields and increment variables

Hi, My first post to this group... I have a need to to parse a source file which is a capture from a network analyser. I have two fields that need to be checked: - Field 7 represents the packet length (an integer), and Field 4 represents a network address (e.g. 192.168.25.3) - The... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: mv652
10 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

AWK- delimiting the strings and matching the fields

Hello, I am newbie in awk. I have just started learning it. 1) I have input file which looks like: {4812 4009 1602 2756 306} {4814 4010 1603 2757 309} {8116 9362 10779 } {10779 10121 9193 10963 10908} {1602 2756 306 957 1025} {1603 2757 307} and so on..... 2) In output: a)... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: kajolo
10 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

AWK : Add Fields of lines with matching field

Dear All, I would like to add values of a field, if the lines match in a certain field. Then I would like to divide the sum though the number of lines that have a matched field. This is the Input: Input: Test1 5 Test1 10 Test2 2 Test2 5 Test2 13 Test3 4 Output: Test1 7.5 Test1 7.5... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: DerSeb
6 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Set variables from fields in fields

Hi, This is my first post here and I am a newbie. :) I have a file that looks like this : Introduction:Intro_123.html Product definition:Prod_def.html System Setup:SSetup-64bit.html Setting up user accounts:Set_user_acc.html I tried to create a script that would output "The filename... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Joq
3 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Awk - Script assistance on identifying non matching fields

Hoping for some assistance. my source file consists of: os, ip, username win7, 123.56.78, john win7, 123.56.78, paul win7, 10.1.1.1, john win7, 10.2.2.3, joe I've been trying to run a script that will only return ip and username where the IP address is the same and the username is... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: tekvaio
3 Replies

7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

awk print all fields except matching regex

grep -v will exclude matching lines, but I want something that will print all lines but exclude a matching field. The pattern that I want excluded is '/mnt/svn' If there is a better solution than awk I am happy to hear about it, but I would like to see this done in awk as well. I know I can... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: glev2005
11 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Awk: adding fields after matching $1

Dear AWK-experts! I did get stuck in the task of combining files after matching fields, so I'm still awkward with learning AWK. There are 2 files: one containing 3 columns with ID, coding status, and score for long noncoding RNAs: file1 (1.txt) (>5000 lines) ... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: kben
12 Replies

9. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Awk: matching multiple fields between 2 files

Hi, I have 2 tab-delimited input files as follows. file1.tab: green A apple red B apple file2.tab: apple - A;Z Objective: Return $1 of file1 if, . $1 of file2 matches $3 of file1 and, . any single element (separated by ";") in $3 of file2 is present in $2 of file1 In order to... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: beca123456
3 Replies

10. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

awk for matching fields between files with repeated records

Hello all, I am having trouble with what should be an easy task, but seem to be missing something fundamental. I have two files, with File 1 consisting of a single field of many thousands of records. I also have File 2 with two fields and many thousands of records. My goal is that when $1 of... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jvoot
2 Replies
funidx(7)							SAORD Documentation							 funidx(7)

NAME
Funidx - Using Indexes to Filter Rows in a Table SYNOPSIS
This document contains a summary of the user interface for filtering rows in binary tables with indexes. DESCRIPTION
Funtools Table Filtering allows rows in a table to be selected based on the values of one or more columns in the row. Because the actual filter code is compiled on the fly, it is very efficient. However, for very large files (hundreds of Mb or larger), evaluating the filter expression on each row can take a long time. Therefore, funtools supports index files for columns, which are used automatically during fil- tering to reduce dramatically the number of row evaluations performed. The speed increase for indexed filtering can be an order of magni- tude or more, depending on the size of the file. The funindex program creates an index on one or more columns in a binary table. For example, to create an index for the column pi in the file huge.fits, use: funindex huge.fits pi This will create an index named huge_pi.idx. When a filter expression is initialized for row evaluation, funtools looks for an index file for each column in the filter expression. If found, and if the file modification date of the index file is later than that of the data file, then the index will be used to reduce the number of rows that are evaluated in the filter. When Spatial Region Filtering is part of the expression, the columns associated with the region are checked for index files. If an index file is not available for a given column, then in general, all rows must be checked when that column is part of a filter expression. This is not true, however, when a non-indexed column is part of an AND expression. In this case, only the rows that pass the other part of the AND expression need to be checked. Thus, in some cases, filtering speed can increase significantly even if all columns are not indexed. Also note that certain types of filter expression syntax cannot make use of indices. For example, calling functions with column names as arguments implies that all rows must be checked against the function value. Once again, however, if this function is part of an AND expres- sion, then a significant improvement in speed still is possible if the other part of the AND expression is indexed. For example, note below the dramatic speedup in searching a 1 Gb file using an AND filter, even when one of the columns (pha) has no index: time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=0,idx_debug=1,pha=2348&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pha" x y pha ---------- ----------- ---------- 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 42.36u 13.07s 6:42.89 13.7% time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=1,idx_debug=1,pha=2348&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pha" x y pha ---------- ----------- ---------- idxeq: [INDEF] idxand sort: x[ROW 8037025:8070128] y[ROW 5757665:5792352] idxand(1): INDEF [IDX_OR_SORT] idxall(1): [IDX_OR_SORT] 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 3999.48 4000.47 2348 1.55u 0.37s 1:19.80 2.4% When all columns are indexed, the increase in speed can be even more dramatic: time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=0,idx_debug=1,pi=770&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pi" x y pi ---------- ----------- ---------- 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 42.60u 12.63s 7:28.63 12.3% time fundisp huge.fits'[idx_activate=1,idx_debug=1,pi=770&&cir 4000 4000 1]' "x y pi" x y pi ---------- ----------- ---------- idxeq: pi start=9473025,stop=9492240 => pi[ROW 9473025:9492240] idxand sort: x[ROW 8037025:8070128] y[ROW 5757665:5792352] idxor sort/merge: pi[ROW 9473025:9492240] [IDX_OR_SORT] idxmerge(5): [IDX_OR_SORT] pi[ROW] idxall(1): [IDX_OR_SORT] 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 3999.48 4000.47 770 1.67u 0.30s 0:24.76 7.9% The miracle of indexed filtering (and indeed, of any indexing) is the speed of the binary search on the index, which is of order log2(n) instead of n. (The funtools binary search method is taken from http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/03/22/Binary, to whom grateful acknowledgement is made.) This means that the larger the file, the better the performance. Conversely, it also means that for small files, using an index (and the overhead involved) can slow filtering down somewhat. Our tests indicate that on a file containing a few tens of thousands of rows, indexed filtering can be 10 to 20 percent slower than non-indexed filtering. Of course, your mileage will vary with con- ditions (disk access speed, amount of available memory, process load, etc.) Any problem encountered during index processing will result in indexing being turned off, and replaced by filtering all rows. You can turn filtering off manually by setting the idx_activate variable to 0 (in a filter expression) or the FILTER_IDX_ACTIVATE environment variable to 0 (in the global environment). Debugging output showing how the indexes are being processed can be displayed to stderr by setting the idx_debug variable to 1 (in a filter expression) or the FILTER_IDX_DEBUG environment variable to 1 (in the global environment). Currently, indexed filtering only works with FITS binary tables and raw event files. It does not work with text files. This restriction might be removed in a future release. SEE ALSO
See funtools(7) for a list of Funtools help pages version 1.4.2 January 2, 2008 funidx(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy