04-08-2013
This question is like:
I do THIS and get THIS result. But, when I do THAT, I get THAT result. Why?
Seriously, do you think anyone can answer you without knowing what THIS and THAT are?
Please post the 2 scripts or their relevant portions. Also mention the way you invoke these scripts and the exact issue.
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi all,
plz can anybody tell me that if a script written for Bash shell also work for other shells and if yes , how ???
Thanks and Regards
SONAL (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sonbag_pspl
2 Replies
2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi,
Is anyone can help me to find out the difference in Shell Scripts between HP and Sun.
Thanks in advance,
Vijay R (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: rv_kumar
3 Replies
3. AIX
Hi,
Please give me the detailed Differences between writing Unix Shell script and AIX Shell Scripts. Thanks in advance..... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: haroonec
0 Replies
4. AIX
Hello everyone,
I have a script thats acting funky, what I would like to do is report to a file, how long its taking to get to certain area's, in seconds. For example.
-- Start timer
-- Run unix command 1
-- Run unix command 2
-- Stop timer
-- Report Seconds
-- etc etc
Is there a way... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: dbridle
3 Replies
5. Shell Programming and Scripting
I am trying to set some environment variables in a shell script which is written in Kshell. I am invoking this script in .profile. The problem is envirnment variables are set within the script but after exiting the script those are gone. I don't have any problem with If I have Kshell as my default... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: roopla
0 Replies
6. Shell Programming and Scripting
Could someone tell me if there is any difference in using square brackets single or doubled pair?
So, do those two some how could be treted by shell differently:
if ; then <statements;> else <statements;> fi
and
if ] ; then <statements;> else <statements;> fi
Maybe any one could... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: alex_5161
5 Replies
7. Solaris
Hi
I am getting some errors when i am running the shell script using the following syntax:
>abc.sh
but the same script works fine with the following syntax:
>sh abc.sh
wats the difference in both....please help
thanks in advance. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: arpit_narula
6 Replies
8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I have a bash shell that even though it does not look pretty is working very well. Some of the steps are repetitive, something like this:
muscle -in ${e}.4 > $e.5
read -t1
sed ':a /^>/!N;s/\n\(\)/\1/;ta' $e.5 > $e.6
read -t2
awk '/>/{fr=$3;getline;n=split ($0,a,""); for (i=1;i<=n;i++)... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Xterra
2 Replies
9. Homework & Coursework Questions
Use and complete the template provided. The entire template must be completed. If you don't, your post may be deleted!
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data:
Test that exactly one command line argrument is enter from the command line. If not, display the usage... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jcoop12
1 Replies
10. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers
Hello... and thanks in advance for reading this or offering me any assistance
I'm trying to understand specific differences between the various login scripts... I understand the differences between interactive vs non-interactive and login vs non-login shells... and that's not where my question... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: bodisha
4 Replies
LEARN ABOUT FREEBSD
atf-sh
ATF-SH(1) BSD General Commands Manual ATF-SH(1)
NAME
atf-sh [-s shell] -- interpreter for shell-based test programs
SYNOPSIS
atf-sh script
DESCRIPTION
atf-sh is an interpreter that runs the test program given in script after loading the atf-sh(3) library.
atf-sh is not a real interpreter though: it is just a wrapper around the system-wide shell defined by ATF_SHELL. atf-sh executes the inter-
preter, loads the atf-sh(3) library and then runs the script. You must consider atf-sh to be a POSIX shell by default and thus should not
use any non-standard extensions.
The following options are available:
-s shell Specifies the shell to use instead of the value provided by ATF_SHELL.
ENVIRONMENT
ATF_LIBEXECDIR Overrides the builtin directory where atf-sh is located. Should not be overridden other than for testing purposes.
ATF_PKGDATADIR Overrides the builtin directory where libatf-sh.subr is located. Should not be overridden other than for testing purposes.
ATF_SHELL Path to the system shell to be used in the generated scripts. Scripts must not rely on this variable being set to select a
specific interpreter.
EXAMPLES
Scripts using atf-sh(3) should start with:
#! /usr/bin/env atf-sh
Alternatively, if you want to explicitly choose a shell interpreter, you cannot rely on env(1) to find atf-sh. Instead, you have to hardcode
the path to atf-sh in the script and then use the -s option afterwards as a single parameter:
#! /path/to/bin/atf-sh -s/bin/bash
ENVIRONMENT
ATF_SHELL Path to the system shell to be used in the generated scripts.
SEE ALSO
atf-sh(3)
BSD
September 27, 2014 BSD