Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Scripts without shebang
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Scripts without shebang Post 302767259 by alister on Wednesday 6th of February 2013 01:34:51 PM
Old 02-06-2013
That's either a shell implementation detail (the shell is not using a libc exec?p() interface) or Apple's libc does not adhere to its documentation.

From Apple's libc exec* manual (emphasis mine):
Quote:
If the header of a file is not recognized (the attempted execve() returned ENOEXEC), these functions
will execute the shell with the path of the file as its first argument. (If this attempt fails, no
further searching is done.)

... <snip> ...

FILES
/bin/sh The shell.
Regards,
Alister
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Shebang

Hi, I am currently writing BASH shell scripts. I am using BASH on a Powerbook G4 running Leopard. Could somebody please explain the difference between #!/bin/bash and #!/bin/sh? I have been using the latter (#!/bin/sh), and things have been working fine. But is that the correct one to use... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: msb65
9 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Doubt in shebang line!!

Do we need to include the exclamatory mark in the shebang line??:confused: What if we dont include it??:eek: Actually what shebang line implies when we run a script?? shebang line--> #!/bin/ksh :p (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: nohup
6 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Relacing the shebang line of a file

Can any one tell me how to replace a shebang line of a file using sed? Eg: If a file contains the following shebang line #!C:/InstantRails/ruby/bin/ruby I would like to replace it with #!/usr/local/bin/ruby The shebang line of the file can be obtained from the command cat... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: linuxnewbe
3 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Multiple shebang lines

*** EDIT: I found something close to my solution under an IIS 7 Module Handle.***** (Non-Homework question, simply an ease of use one) Odd question here and maybe its my newness to cgi/Perl, but is it possible to have 2 shebang lines? I write an test a ton of my homework code on my windows... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sennex
1 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

The Shebang!

Hi, I always thought that #!/usr/bin/ksh means that the script would be executed in korn shell i.e. when we'll execute the script with this line as the very first line then the shell spawns a korn shell (in this case as we are using #!/usr/bin/ksh ) and the script gets executed. But I am... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: dips_ag
7 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Hyphen char after shebang notation

Hi, I have a trivial question to ask, I am seeing in some shell scripts the '-' (hyphen) character following the first line of shell script (i.e) the shebang notation as follows: #!/bin/sh - #! /bin/bash - what does the hyphen signify? What will happen if it is not given explicitly? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: royalibrahim
2 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Shebang

If i am not using #! in my script. By default where will be my script running? (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Kochu77
6 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

csh shebang query

What does the "-f" mean in following interpreter code #!/bin/csh -f Thank you (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: animesharma
2 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Necessity of shebang line

Hi , I know about the shebang line in shell scripting. Just want to know whether is there any difference in execution of the program by keeping and not keeping the shebang line. Because without shebang line also the script is working. correct me if am wrong. Any help on this will be helpful (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: rogerben
5 Replies
EXEC(3) 						   BSD Library Functions Manual 						   EXEC(3)

NAME
execl, execle, execlp, execv, execvp, execvP -- execute a file LIBRARY
Standard C Library (libc, -lc) SYNOPSIS
#include <unistd.h> extern char **environ; int execl(const char *path, const char *arg0, ... /*, (char *)0 */); int execle(const char *path, const char *arg0, ... /*, (char *)0, char *const envp[] */); int execlp(const char *file, const char *arg0, ... /*, (char *)0 */); int execv(const char *path, char *const argv[]); int execvp(const char *file, char *const argv[]); int execvP(const char *file, const char *search_path, char *const argv[]); DESCRIPTION
The exec family of functions replaces the current process image with a new process image. The functions described in this manual page are front-ends for the function execve(2). (See the manual page for execve(2) for detailed information about the replacement of the current process.) The initial argument for these functions is the pathname of a file which is to be executed. The const char *arg0 and subsequent ellipses in the execl(), execlp(), and execle() functions can be thought of as arg0, arg1, ..., argn. Together they describe a list of one or more pointers to null-terminated strings that represent the argument list available to the executed program. The first argument, by convention, should point to the file name associated with the file being executed. The list of arguments must be terminated by a NULL pointer. The execv(), execvp(), and execvP() functions provide an array of pointers to null-terminated strings that represent the argument list avail- able to the new program. The first argument, by convention, should point to the file name associated with the file being executed. The array of pointers must be terminated by a NULL pointer. The execle() function also specifies the environment of the executed process by following the NULL pointer that terminates the list of argu- ments in the argument list or the pointer to the argv array with an additional argument. This additional argument is an array of pointers to null-terminated strings and must be terminated by a NULL pointer. The other functions take the environment for the new process image from the external variable environ in the current process. Some of these functions have special semantics. The functions execlp(), execvp(), and execvP() will duplicate the actions of the shell in searching for an executable file if the specified file name does not contain a slash ``/'' character. For execlp() and execvp(), search path is the path specified in the environment by ``PATH'' variable. If this variable is not specified, the default path is set according to the _PATH_DEFPATH definition in <paths.h>, which is set to ``/usr/bin:/bin''. For execvP(), the search path is specified as an argument to the function. In addition, certain errors are treated specially. If an error is ambiguous (for simplicity, we shall consider all errors except ENOEXEC as being ambiguous here, although only the critical error EACCES is really ambiguous), then these functions will act as if they stat the file to determine whether the file exists and has suit- able execute permissions. If it does, they will return immediately with the global variable errno restored to the value set by execve(). Otherwise, the search will be continued. If the search completes without performing a successful execve() or terminating due to an error, these functions will return with the global variable errno set to EACCES or ENOENT according to whether at least one file with suitable exe- cute permissions was found. If the header of a file is not recognized (the attempted execve() returned ENOEXEC), these functions will execute the shell with the path of the file as its first argument. (If this attempt fails, no further searching is done.) RETURN VALUES
If any of the exec() functions returns, an error will have occurred. The return value is -1, and the global variable errno will be set to indicate the error. FILES
/bin/sh The shell. COMPATIBILITY
Historically, the default path for the execlp() and execvp() functions was ``:/bin:/usr/bin''. This was changed to place the current direc- tory last to enhance system security. The behavior of execlp() and execvp() when errors occur while attempting to execute the file is not quite historic practice, and has not tra- ditionally been documented and is not specified by the POSIX standard. Traditionally, the functions execlp() and execvp() ignored all errors except for the ones described above and ETXTBSY, upon which they retried after sleeping for several seconds, and ENOMEM and E2BIG, upon which they returned. They now return for ETXTBSY, and determine exis- tence and executability more carefully. In particular, EACCES for inaccessible directories in the path prefix is no longer confused with EACCES for files with unsuitable execute permissions. In 4.4BSD, they returned upon all errors except EACCES, ENOENT, ENOEXEC and ETXTBSY. This was inferior to the traditional error handling, since it breaks the ignoring of errors for path prefixes and only improves the handling of the unusual ambiguous error EFAULT and the unusual error EIO. The behaviour was changed to match the behaviour of sh(1). ERRORS
The execl(), execle(), execlp(), execvp(), and execvP() functions may fail and set errno for any of the errors specified for the library functions execve(2) and malloc(3). The execv() function may fail and set errno for any of the errors specified for the library function execve(2). SEE ALSO
sh(1), execve(2), fork(2), ptrace(2), environ(7) STANDARDS
The execl(), execv(), execle(), execlp(), and execvp() functions conform to IEEE Std 1003.1-1988 (``POSIX.1''). The execvP() function first appeared in FreeBSD 5.2. BSD
January 24, 1994 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy