The reason I ask is I am reviewing the only Dell document I could find regarding this and it talkes about Etherchannel and using interfaces called ent0 and ent1, which shows up in my system, but I can't assign IP addresses to those interfaces. Only to my main interface en0 and I do not want that to change since my iSCSI network is separate.
To be honest i don't know your cards and will probably not be of much help to you. Just a few things here i can clear up:
"Etherchannel" is IBMs name for bundling several IP interfaces together to one. You can do that either for failover purposes or for load balancing. The process is: you first create the physical interfaces (entX, entX+1, ...), don't give them any IP address or configure them otherwise, then create an "Etherchannel" device from them. You probably want to follow the SMIT panels for this, they are pretty self-explanatory.
Issue a
which should show you your cards as well as by which device name they go by.
If you have two or more servers load balancing, are the servers mirroring one another? If images, etc., are uploaded, will they be stored on all the servers so that if one server goes down, the images will be served up by another server? (1 Reply)
Hi guys, I wonder if someone would be able to assist with my problem. I have just set up a load balancer for a company I am working for. HTTP redirection is working fine, however they also want to load balance SSH and FTP too.
At the moment the perlbal config looks like;
CREATE POOL webhttp
... (1 Reply)
Is it possible to do a load balancing ( incoming and outgoing )with with IPMP in solaris 10 like sun trunking ? If yes what are the steps involved in it , i know how to do the failover IPMP both link based and probe based but i 'm looking for possible load balancing (3 Replies)
Hi All,
I have one webserver which has an application for a set of internal users can be accessed by _http://server1.com
I am planning to load balance this application. For that I have cloned this server and build a new one which can be accessed using _http://server2.com]Server2.com. Also i... (2 Replies)
Hi folks,
(Sorry I don't know what its technology is termed exactly. High Availability OR load balancing)
What I'm going to explore is as follows:-
For example, on Physical Servers;
Server-1 - LAMP, a working server
Server-2 - LAMP, for redundancy
While Server-1 is working all... (3 Replies)
Hi,
We have 2 pools of servers. Lets call them A and B and they would contain 2 servers each. Pool A will be hosting www.example.com/app/v1 and pool B will be hosting www.example.com/app/v2. Clients will be requesting right url (/v1 or /v2) but will be hitting just one IP.
I'd like to:
1)... (3 Replies)
Hi,
Currently we have 3 old and 3 new servers catering to Live traffic. As my component move from legacy interfaces to MQ one, we want to have load balancing of old interfaces available on MQ interface as well.
For this, we want to send only 30% of all MQ traffic on 3 OLD Live servers, and want... (1 Reply)
Hi,
I am working on development project where I have to migrate many jobs from Tidal to Autosys R11.
During this project we came across the following requirements.
1. There are 3 real machines. There could be many jobs activated simultaneously, but only one job should execute at a time and... (0 Replies)
Dear All,
Can any one help me for this request?
There is a case. I have 20 files which I need to FTP to 5 servers. I want to know if there is any possibility to make a load balancer which transfers files in round robin manner to 5 servers.
As per theoretical algorithm, what I think, flow can... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: Zaib
9 Replies
LEARN ABOUT X11R4
ipsec_tncfg
IPSEC_TNCFG(8) [FIXME: manual] IPSEC_TNCFG(8)NAME
ipsec_tncfg - manipulate KLIPS virtual interfaces
SYNOPSIS
ipsec tncfg
ipsec tncfg --create virtual
ipsec tncfg --delete virtual
ipsec tncfg --attach --virtual virtual --physical physical
ipsec tncfg --detach --virtual virtual
ipsec tncfg --clear
ipsec tncfg --version
ipsec tncfg --help
OBSOLETE
Note that tncfg is only supported on the classic KLIPS stack. It is not supported on any other stack and will be completely removed in
future versions. A replacement command still needs to be designed
DESCRIPTION
The historical use of tncfg is to attach/detach IPsec virtual interfaces (e.g. ipsec0) to/from physical interfaces (e.g. eth0) through
which packets will be forwarded once processed by KLIPS.
The modern use of tncfg is to create and delete virtual interfaces known as mastXXX. mast stands for Mooring and XXX.
The form with no additional arguments lists the contents of /proc/net/ipsec_tncfg. The format of /proc/net/ipsec_tncfg is discussed in
ipsec_tncfg(5).
The --attach form attaches the virtual interface to the physical one.
The --detach form detaches the virtual interface from whichever physical interface it is attached to.
The --clear form clears all the virtual interfaces from whichever physical interfaces they were attached to.
Virtual interfaces typically have names like ipsec0 or mast0 while physical interfaces typically have names like eth0 or ppp0.
EXAMPLES
ipsec tncfg --create mast12
creates the mast12 device.
ipsec tncfg --create ipsec4
creates an ipsec4 device, but does not attach it.
ipsec tncfg --attach --virtual ipsec0 --physical eth0
attaches the ipsec0 virtual device to the eth0 physical device.
FILES
/proc/net/ipsec_tncfg, /usr/local/bin/ipsec
SEE ALSO ipsec(8), ipsec_manual(8), ipsec_eroute(8), ipsec_spi(8), ipsec_spigrp(8), ipsec_klipsdebug(8), ipsec_tncfg(5)HISTORY
Written for the Linux FreeS/WAN project <http://www.freeswan.org/> by Richard Guy Briggs.
[FIXME: source] 10/06/2010 IPSEC_TNCFG(8)