Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Video geometry distortion
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Video geometry distortion Post 302741097 by chebarbudo on Friday 7th of December 2012 11:40:35 AM
Old 12-07-2012
Video geometry distortion

Hi there,

I need an expert to get started with output video distortion.

I have a box that needs to display a roughly 4000px * 1000px window (it's basically a web page). The problem is that the image is then projected on a wall that is not really flat.
So basically, I'm wondering if I can find a piece of software that can take a video input and distort it before sending it to the graphic card so that the image looks flat on a weird wall.

I'm a complete newbie in that subject. I have studied hardware solutions where I just send one video signal to another machine that creates the distortion and then sends the new video signal to a projector. But it's quite expensive and the setup is a bit obscure and needs to be done by a specialist.

Any lead?

Thanks for your help.
Santiago
 

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

sxpm geometry option

Hi, i wanted to know how to pass the vaules for the geometry option for sxpm. sxpm -g <?> filename.xpm what do i put in the '?' part. :confused: Thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: prabhu.pravin
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Mirroring Disk Geometry

How can one mirror disk geometry from one hard disk to another in Solaris. Is disk snapshot same as a mirror? Pls explain. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: lexusujx
3 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

seeking for browser that would respect X geometry

hello, I'm trying to run 4 browsers on one screen. Not necessarily with window manager. In kiosk mode. So I have couple of problems to solve, main showstopper is that I am not able to find any browser that would accept --geometry. xserver.xorg is installed and I'd like to open browser with... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: michelek
0 Replies

4. Solaris

Puzzled over over the relationship between the partition and geometry of hard disk.

Not sure why solaris couldn't detect the geometry of a hard disk which has a working OS of winxp pro. Is it due to the different OS that the partition information is stored in different location? When I type '"format" it is shown as below, c3d1 < drive type unknown>... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: just.srad
5 Replies

5. Solaris

Corrupt label bad geometry

Hi, I have a Sun X4200, when I try to reboot the machine it's not detecting the drive and it shows the following error when I try to rebuilt it. I am not sure whether its a bad HD or something else. Label says 983040 blocks: Drive says 983039 blocks WARNING:... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: gunnervarma
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Does formatting slice 2 (backup) destroy disk geometry?

I am a new Unix Sys Admin who is learning mostly from books with minimal classroom training (ie: no certificates, training is largely hands-on, conducted at work). I work with Solaris 8 through 10, and with some fairly outdated hardware. In my work restoring old workstations I have been instructed... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mia-chan
2 Replies
pnmscalefixed(1)					      General Commands Manual						  pnmscalefixed(1)

NAME
pnmscalefixed - scale a portable anymap quickly, but less accurate DESCRIPTION
pnmscalefixed is the same thing as pnmscale except that it uses fixed point arithmetic internally instead of floating point, which makes it run faster. In turn, it is less accurate and may distort the image. Use the pnmscale man page with pnmscalefixed. This man page only describes the difference. pnmscalefixed uses fixed point 12 bit arithmetic. By contrast, pnmscale uses floating point arithmetic which on most machines is probably 24 bit precision. This makes pnmscalefixed run faster (30% faster in one experiment), but the imprecision can cause distortions at the right and bottom edges. The distortion takes the following form: One pixel from the edge of the input is rendered larger in the output than the scaling factor requires. Consequently, the rest of the image is smaller than the scaling factor requires, because the overall dimensions of the image are always as requested. This distortion will usually be very hard to see. pnmscalefixed with the -verbose option tells you how much distortion there is. The amount of distortion depends on the size of the input image and how close the scaling factor is to an integral 1/4096th. If the scaling factor is an exact multiple of 1/4096, there is no distortion. So, for example doubling or halving an image causes no dis- tortion. But reducing it or enlarging it by a third would cause some distortion. To consider an extreme case, scaling a 100,000 row image down to 50,022 rows would create an output image with all of the input squeezed into the top 50,000 rows, and the last row of the input copied into the bottom 22 rows of output. pnmscalefixed could probably be modified to use 16 bit or better arithmetic without losing anything. The modification would consist of a single constant in the source code. Until there is a demonstrated need for that, though, the Netpbm maintainer wants to keep the safety cushion afforded by the original 12 bit precision. pnmscalefixed does not have pnmscale 's -nomix option. 18 November 2000 pnmscalefixed(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy