Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Cut and paste data in new file Post 302674963 by asavaliya on Saturday 21st of July 2012 02:47:31 AM
Old 07-21-2012
Bug Cut and paste data in new file

HI Guys,

I have file A:

Code:
Abc XyZ Abc Xyz Kal Kaloo 
Abc XyZ Abc Xyz Kalpooo 
Abc XyZ Abc Xyz  Kloo 
Abc  Abc  Klooo

I want file B
Code:
Abc XyZ Abc Xyz Kal Kaloo 
Abc XyZ Abc Xyz Kalpooo 
Abc XyZ Abc Xyz  Kloo

File A is now 1 lines

Code:
Abc  Abc  Klooo

Cut all lines which have xyz and kal

Thanks
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

cut and paste using awk

Hi i need a favour i have a file which has some trillions of records. The file is like this 11111000000000192831840914000000000000000000000000000 45789899090000000000000000011111111111111111111111111 I want to cut specific postions in each line like cut1-3 and assisgn it to a variable and... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: richa2.m
5 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

cut and paste?

hi, I have a file with content like this for an employee: EmployeeID 101 Day_type, day vacation,1/2/2009 sick day, 3/2/2009 personal day, 4/5/2009 jury duty day, 5/5/2009 how do I make the result to show: EmployeeID,Day_type,day 101,vacation,1/2/2009 101,sick day,... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: jbchen
6 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

cut and paste

Hi, Need a help with shell script. I have to search for a string in one of the file, if match found, copy the line to a new file and delete the line from the exisiting file. eg: 83510000000000063800000.1800000.1600000.1600000.2400000.1800000.2000000.21... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: gpaulose
6 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Cut and paste data in matrix form

I have large formatted data file with five columns. This has to be rearranged in lower order matrix form as shown below for sample data. 1 2 3 4 5 1.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 5.0 2.0... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: dhilipumich
7 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Cut paste from one file to other

Hello, I am working on unix for the first time. I have to write a shell script where i want to cut paste from one file to other. File "1234.abc" is 03,12345555 16,936,x,x,120 16,936,x,x,100 49,12345555 03,12347710 16,936,x,x,115 16,936,x,x,122 49,12347710 03,12342222... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: swapsb
9 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

need help with cut and paste command

I have a file which contains 3 fields separated by tabs example andrew kid baker I need to swap kid and baker using cut and paste commands how is this to be done? Thanks (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: drew211
3 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Help required the cut the whole contents from one file and paste it into new file

Hi, First of all sincere apologies if I have posted in a wrong section ! Please correct me if I am wrong ! I am very new to UNIX scripting. Currently my problem is that I have a code file at the location /home/usr/workarea/GeneratedLogs.log :- Code :- (Feb 7, 571 7:07:29 AM),... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: acidburn_007
4 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Issue with cut and paste

let i have A file and B file A has contains 4 fields as below ---------------- f1 f2 f3 f4 B file consists of 5 fields as below -------------------- f5 f6 f7 f8 f9 need to display as below output: f5 f1 f3 f8 f9 (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ANSHUMAN1983
2 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Cut, replace and Paste a String from one file to another

I need to cut all the Strings in one file and Paste it in the another file in the Specific line by replacing the specific String. For Example Step 1: From the newfile.txt, i need to copy all the strings newfile.txt How are you, I am fine, How is your work newfle2.txt Hello david,... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Padmanabhan
2 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to cut a pipe delimited file and paste it with another file to form a comma separated outputfile

Hello ppl I have a requirement to split (cut in unix) a file (A.txt) which is a pipe delimited file into A1.txt and A2.txt Now I have to join (paste in unix) this A2.txt with external file A3.txt to form output file A4.txt which should be CSV (comma separated file) so that third party can... (25 Replies)
Discussion started by: etldev
25 Replies
PERLLEXWARN(1)						 Perl Programmers Reference Guide					    PERLLEXWARN(1)

NAME
perllexwarn - Perl Lexical Warnings DESCRIPTION
The "use warnings" pragma enables to control precisely what warnings are to be enabled in which parts of a Perl program. It's a more flexible alternative for both the command line flag -w and the equivalent Perl variable, $^W. This pragma works just like the "strict" pragma. This means that the scope of the warning pragma is limited to the enclosing block. It also means that the pragma setting will not leak across files (via "use", "require" or "do"). This allows authors to independently define the degree of warning checks that will be applied to their module. By default, optional warnings are disabled, so any legacy code that doesn't attempt to control the warnings will work unchanged. All warnings are enabled in a block by either of these: use warnings; use warnings 'all'; Similarly all warnings are disabled in a block by either of these: no warnings; no warnings 'all'; For example, consider the code below: use warnings; my @a; { no warnings; my $b = @a[0]; } my $c = @a[0]; The code in the enclosing block has warnings enabled, but the inner block has them disabled. In this case that means the assignment to the scalar $c will trip the "Scalar value @a[0] better written as $a[0]" warning, but the assignment to the scalar $b will not. Default Warnings and Optional Warnings Before the introduction of lexical warnings, Perl had two classes of warnings: mandatory and optional. As its name suggests, if your code tripped a mandatory warning, you would get a warning whether you wanted it or not. For example, the code below would always produce an "isn't numeric" warning about the "2:". my $a = "2:" + 3; With the introduction of lexical warnings, mandatory warnings now become default warnings. The difference is that although the previously mandatory warnings are still enabled by default, they can then be subsequently enabled or disabled with the lexical warning pragma. For example, in the code below, an "isn't numeric" warning will only be reported for the $a variable. my $a = "2:" + 3; no warnings; my $b = "2:" + 3; Note that neither the -w flag or the $^W can be used to disable/enable default warnings. They are still mandatory in this case. What's wrong with -w and $^W Although very useful, the big problem with using -w on the command line to enable warnings is that it is all or nothing. Take the typical scenario when you are writing a Perl program. Parts of the code you will write yourself, but it's very likely that you will make use of pre-written Perl modules. If you use the -w flag in this case, you end up enabling warnings in pieces of code that you haven't written. Similarly, using $^W to either disable or enable blocks of code is fundamentally flawed. For a start, say you want to disable warnings in a block of code. You might expect this to be enough to do the trick: { local ($^W) = 0; my $a =+ 2; my $b; chop $b; } When this code is run with the -w flag, a warning will be produced for the $a line: "Reversed += operator". The problem is that Perl has both compile-time and run-time warnings. To disable compile-time warnings you need to rewrite the code like this: { BEGIN { $^W = 0 } my $a =+ 2; my $b; chop $b; } The other big problem with $^W is the way you can inadvertently change the warning setting in unexpected places in your code. For example, when the code below is run (without the -w flag), the second call to "doit" will trip a "Use of uninitialized value" warning, whereas the first will not. sub doit { my $b; chop $b; } doit(); { local ($^W) = 1; doit() } This is a side-effect of $^W being dynamically scoped. Lexical warnings get around these limitations by allowing finer control over where warnings can or can't be tripped. Controlling Warnings from the Command Line There are three Command Line flags that can be used to control when warnings are (or aren't) produced: -w This is the existing flag. If the lexical warnings pragma is not used in any of you code, or any of the modules that you use, this flag will enable warnings everywhere. See "Backward Compatibility" for details of how this flag interacts with lexical warnings. -W If the -W flag is used on the command line, it will enable all warnings throughout the program regardless of whether warnings were disabled locally using "no warnings" or "$^W =0". This includes all files that get included via "use", "require" or "do". Think of it as the Perl equivalent of the "lint" command. -X Does the exact opposite to the -W flag, i.e. it disables all warnings. Backward Compatibility If you are used with working with a version of Perl prior to the introduction of lexically scoped warnings, or have code that uses both lexical warnings and $^W, this section will describe how they interact. How Lexical Warnings interact with -w/$^W: 1. If none of the three command line flags (-w, -W or -X) that control warnings is used and neither $^W or the "warnings" pragma are used, then default warnings will be enabled and optional warnings disabled. This means that legacy code that doesn't attempt to control the warnings will work unchanged. 2. The -w flag just sets the global $^W variable as in 5.005. This means that any legacy code that currently relies on manipulating $^W to control warning behavior will still work as is. 3. Apart from now being a boolean, the $^W variable operates in exactly the same horrible uncontrolled global way, except that it cannot disable/enable default warnings. 4. If a piece of code is under the control of the "warnings" pragma, both the $^W variable and the -w flag will be ignored for the scope of the lexical warning. 5. The only way to override a lexical warnings setting is with the -W or -X command line flags. The combined effect of 3 & 4 is that it will allow code which uses the "warnings" pragma to control the warning behavior of $^W-type code (using a "local $^W=0") if it really wants to, but not vice-versa. Category Hierarchy A hierarchy of "categories" have been defined to allow groups of warnings to be enabled/disabled in isolation. The current hierarchy is: all -+ | +- closure | +- deprecated | +- exiting | +- glob | +- io -----------+ | | | +- closed | | | +- exec | | | +- layer | | | +- newline | | | +- pipe | | | +- unopened | +- imprecision | +- misc | +- numeric | +- once | +- overflow | +- pack | +- portable | +- recursion | +- redefine | +- regexp | +- severe -------+ | | | +- debugging | | | +- inplace | | | +- internal | | | +- malloc | +- signal | +- substr | +- syntax -------+ | | | +- ambiguous | | | +- bareword | | | +- digit | | | +- illegalproto | | | +- parenthesis | | | +- precedence | | | +- printf | | | +- prototype | | | +- qw | | | +- reserved | | | +- semicolon | +- taint | +- threads | +- uninitialized | +- unpack | +- untie | +- utf8 | +- void Just like the "strict" pragma any of these categories can be combined use warnings qw(void redefine); no warnings qw(io syntax untie); Also like the "strict" pragma, if there is more than one instance of the "warnings" pragma in a given scope the cumulative effect is additive. use warnings qw(void); # only "void" warnings enabled ... use warnings qw(io); # only "void" & "io" warnings enabled ... no warnings qw(void); # only "io" warnings enabled To determine which category a specific warning has been assigned to see perldiag. Note: In Perl 5.6.1, the lexical warnings category "deprecated" was a sub-category of the "syntax" category. It is now a top-level category in its own right. Fatal Warnings The presence of the word "FATAL" in the category list will escalate any warnings detected from the categories specified in the lexical scope into fatal errors. In the code below, the use of "time", "length" and "join" can all produce a "Useless use of xxx in void context" warning. use warnings; time; { use warnings FATAL => qw(void); length "abc"; } join "", 1,2,3; print "done "; When run it produces this output Useless use of time in void context at fatal line 3. Useless use of length in void context at fatal line 7. The scope where "length" is used has escalated the "void" warnings category into a fatal error, so the program terminates immediately it encounters the warning. To explicitly turn off a "FATAL" warning you just disable the warning it is associated with. So, for example, to disable the "void" warning in the example above, either of these will do the trick: no warnings qw(void); no warnings FATAL => qw(void); If you want to downgrade a warning that has been escalated into a fatal error back to a normal warning, you can use the "NONFATAL" keyword. For example, the code below will promote all warnings into fatal errors, except for those in the "syntax" category. use warnings FATAL => 'all', NONFATAL => 'syntax'; Reporting Warnings from a Module The "warnings" pragma provides a number of functions that are useful for module authors. These are used when you want to report a module- specific warning to a calling module has enabled warnings via the "warnings" pragma. Consider the module "MyMod::Abc" below. package MyMod::Abc; use warnings::register; sub open { my $path = shift; if ($path !~ m#^/#) { warnings::warn("changing relative path to /var/abc") if warnings::enabled(); $path = "/var/abc/$path"; } } 1; The call to "warnings::register" will create a new warnings category called "MyMod::Abc", i.e. the new category name matches the current package name. The "open" function in the module will display a warning message if it gets given a relative path as a parameter. This warnings will only be displayed if the code that uses "MyMod::Abc" has actually enabled them with the "warnings" pragma like below. use MyMod::Abc; use warnings 'MyMod::Abc'; ... abc::open("../fred.txt"); It is also possible to test whether the pre-defined warnings categories are set in the calling module with the "warnings::enabled" function. Consider this snippet of code: package MyMod::Abc; sub open { warnings::warnif("deprecated", "open is deprecated, use new instead"); new(@_); } sub new ... 1; The function "open" has been deprecated, so code has been included to display a warning message whenever the calling module has (at least) the "deprecated" warnings category enabled. Something like this, say. use warnings 'deprecated'; use MyMod::Abc; ... MyMod::Abc::open($filename); Either the "warnings::warn" or "warnings::warnif" function should be used to actually display the warnings message. This is because they can make use of the feature that allows warnings to be escalated into fatal errors. So in this case use MyMod::Abc; use warnings FATAL => 'MyMod::Abc'; ... MyMod::Abc::open('../fred.txt'); the "warnings::warnif" function will detect this and die after displaying the warning message. The three warnings functions, "warnings::warn", "warnings::warnif" and "warnings::enabled" can optionally take an object reference in place of a category name. In this case the functions will use the class name of the object as the warnings category. Consider this example: package Original; no warnings; use warnings::register; sub new { my $class = shift; bless [], $class; } sub check { my $self = shift; my $value = shift; if ($value % 2 && warnings::enabled($self)) { warnings::warn($self, "Odd numbers are unsafe") } } sub doit { my $self = shift; my $value = shift; $self->check($value); # ... } 1; package Derived; use warnings::register; use Original; our @ISA = qw( Original ); sub new { my $class = shift; bless [], $class; } 1; The code below makes use of both modules, but it only enables warnings from "Derived". use Original; use Derived; use warnings 'Derived'; my $a = Original->new(); $a->doit(1); my $b = Derived->new(); $a->doit(1); When this code is run only the "Derived" object, $b, will generate a warning. Odd numbers are unsafe at main.pl line 7 Notice also that the warning is reported at the line where the object is first used. SEE ALSO
warnings, perldiag. AUTHOR
Paul Marquess perl v5.12.1 2010-04-26 PERLLEXWARN(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy