Sponsored Content
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Difference between these cron commands Post 302640301 by 47shailesh on Monday 14th of May 2012 12:18:42 PM
Old 05-14-2012
sorry bad post

Last edited by 47shailesh; 05-14-2012 at 01:27 PM.. Reason: messed up with minutes and hour fields sorry
This User Gave Thanks to 47shailesh For This Post:
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

what's the difference of these two commands?

shouldn't they give the same output? echo `echo \`date\`` is the same as the command date echo `echo date` prints the word date thanks! (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: kfad
3 Replies

2. Solaris

difference between these commands??

Hi, I would like to know what is the difference between executing the mount command in the following ways... eg: /usr/sbin/mount -F <something> AND mount -F <something> I mean , just executing the mount command as opposed to specifying the path and then executing it? ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: wrapster
3 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Difference in commands

Hello All, I have a question about the difference between two commands. I am using Korn and was told by the Unix admin that 'nohup <command> &' equals 'nohup ./<command> &. That there is no difference betwewen the two. Is this true? Also, does the command './<command> &' provide a disconnect... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: grin1dan
4 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Difference between Maestro and Cron job

Hi, I have to setup a process which will run every 30 minutes and perform a task. I have been looking into and considered to put a cron job in place which will automatically execute the process. But lately I have found that Maestro job is also a process which will allow me to do the... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: shanth_chandra
3 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Difference between the commands

HI all, Please clarify the difference between the following pm2srv:/var/opt/temip/vf/scripts/saiki#awk '{RS = ":"} ; {print $0}' testf2 hey:wasup:howru: Yes I am fine pm2srv:/var/opt/temip/vf/scripts/saiki#awk 'BEGIN { RS = ":" } ; { print $0 }' testf2 hey wasup howru Yes I... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: saiki
0 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Check for difference in output of 2 commands?

Hello! I'm just learning the shell, and I would really like to know how to do this: Given these 2 commands: ls -l ls -le How can I, with a one-liner, ask the shell to show me visually in the shell, what the difference is between the output of the two commands? They look the same to me... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: turbofayce
6 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Difference between 2 grep - commands

Hi, I need to know the difference between this commands: grep * *search* grep "*" *search* As far as i know does the 2nd command search for files which have a name with *search* and greps then all which have chars from a-z in the file content. But was does the first command?? Best... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: xus
1 Replies

8. Solaris

Performance difference between commands

Looking at the performance hit on my server, does it matter wich command I run? client # rsh server tar –cf - . | tar –cv –f – or server # tar –cf – . | rsh client ‘cd target && tar –xv -f –‘ I think it doesn't really matter because both command strings involve a tar being run on... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: petervg
4 Replies

9. AIX

HACMP: difference between 'cl' commands and 'cli' commands

Hi all, I'm new in this forum. I'm looking for the difference between the HACMP commands with the prefix "cl" and "cli". The first type are under /usr/es/sbin/cluster/sbin directory and the second are under /usr/es/sbin/cluster/cspoc directory. I know that the first are called HACMP for AIX... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: peppix
0 Replies

10. Solaris

Difference between commands

i need to know the difference between two commands ps -ef|grep oracle ps -ef|grep -v grep |grep oracle (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: smazshah
1 Replies
BADSECT(8)						      System Manager's Manual							BADSECT(8)

NAME
badsect - create files to contain bad sectors SYNOPSIS
/sbin/badsect sector ... DESCRIPTION
Badsect makes a file to contain a bad sector. Normally, bad sectors are made inaccessible by the standard formatter, which provides a for- warding table for bad sectors to the driver; see bad144(8) for details. If a driver supports the bad blocking standard it is much prefer- able to use that method to isolate bad blocks, since the bad block forwarding makes the pack appear perfect, and such packs can then be copied with dd(1). The technique used by this program is also less general than bad block forwarding, as badsect can't make amends for bad blocks in the i-list of file systems or in swap areas. Adding a sector which is suddenly bad to the bad sector table currently requires the running of the standard DEC formatter, as UNIX does not supply formatters. Thus to deal with a newly bad block or on disks where the drivers do not support the bad-blocking standard badsect may be used to good effect. Badsect is used on a quiet file system in the following way: First mount the file system, and change to its root directory. Make a direc- tory BAD there and change into it. Run badsect giving as argument all the bad sectors you wish to add. (The sector numbers should be given as physical disk sectors relative to the beginning of the file system, exactly as the system reports the sector numbers in its con- sole error messages.) Then change back to the root directory, unmount the file system and run fsck(8) on the file system. The bad sectors should show up in two files or in the bad sector files and the free list. Have fsck remove files containing the offending bad sectors, but do not have it remove the BAD/nnnnn files. This will leave the bad sectors in only the BAD files. Badsect works by giving the specified sector numbers in a mknod(2) system call (after taking into account the filesystem's block size), creating a regular file whose first block address is the block containing bad sector and whose name is the bad sector number. The file has 0 length, but the check programs will still consider it to contain the block containing the sector. This has the pleasant effect that the sector is completely inaccessible to the containing file system since it is not available by accessing the file. SEE ALSO
mknod(2), bad144(8), fsck(8) BUGS
If both sectors which comprise a (1024 byte) disk block are bad, you should specify only one of them to badsect, as the blocks in the bad sector files actually cover both (bad) disk sectors. On the PDP-11, only sector number less than 131072 may be specified on 1024-byte block filesystems, 65536 on 512-byte block filesystems. This is because only a short int is passed to the system from mknod. 3rd Berkeley Distribution BADSECT(8)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:58 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy