Sponsored Content
Operating Systems HP-UX Faster command for file copy than cp ? Post 302596282 by Shirishlnx on Tuesday 7th of February 2012 04:45:24 AM
Old 02-07-2012
renice the pid of cp command ... It will work bit
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

command faster in crontab..

Hi all you enlightened unix people, I've been trying to execute a perl script that contains the following line within backticks: `grep -f patternfile.txt otherfile.txt`;It takes normally 2 minutes to execute this command from the bash shell by hand. I noticed that when i run this command... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: silverlocket
2 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to make copy work faster

I am trying to copy a folder which contains a list of C executables. It takes 2 mins for completion,where as the entire script takes only 3 more minutes for other process. Is there a way to copy the folder faster so that the performance of the script will improve? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: prasperl
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Which command will be faster? y?

i)wc -c/etc/passwd|awk'{print $1}' ii)ls -al/etc/passwd|awk'{print $5}' (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: karthi_g
4 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

**HELP** need to split this line faster than cut-command

Hi, A datafile containing lines such as below needs to be split: 500000000000932491683600000000000000000000000000016800000GS0000000000932491683600*HOME I need to get the 2-5, 11-20, and 35-40 characters and I can do it via cut command. cut -c 2-5 file > temp1.txt cut -c 11-20 file >... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: daytripper1021
9 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

faster command than find for sorting?

I'm sorting files from a source directory by size into 4 categories then copying them into 4 corresponding folders, just wondering if there's a faster/better/more_elegant way to do this: find /home/user/sourcefiles -type f -size -400000k -exec /bin/cp -uv {} /home/user/medfiles/ \; find... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: unclecameron
0 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Multi thread awk command for faster performance

Hi, I have a script below for extracting xml from a file. for i in *.txt do echo $i awk '/<.*/ , /.*<\/.*>/' "$i" | tr -d '\n' echo -ne '\n' done . I read about using multi threading to speed up the script. I do not know much about it but read it on this forum. Is it a... (21 Replies)
Discussion started by: chetan.c
21 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Faster way to use this awk command

awk "/May 23, 2012 /,0" /var/tmp/datafile the above command pulls out information in the datafile. the information it pulls is from the date specified to the end of the file. now, how can i make this faster if the datafile is huge? even if it wasn't huge, i feel there's a better/faster way to... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: SkySmart
8 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

A faster equivalent for this sed command

Hello guys, I'm cleaning out big XML files (we're talking about 1GB at least), most of them contain words written in a non-latin alphabet. The command I'm using is so slow it's not even funny: cat $1 | sed -e :a -e 's/&lt;*&gt;//g;/&lt;/N;//ba;s/</ /g;s/>/... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: bobylapointe
4 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Making a faster alternative to a slow awk command

Hi, I have a large number of input files with two columns of numbers. For example: 83 1453 99 3255 99 8482 99 7372 83 175 I only wish to retain lines where the numbers fullfil two requirements. E.g: =83 1000<=<=2000 To do this I use the following... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: s052866
10 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to make awk command faster?

I have the below command which is referring a large file and it is taking 3 hours to run. Can something be done to make this command faster. awk -F ',' '{OFS=","}{ if ($13 == "9999") print $1,$2,$3,$4,$5,$6,$7,$8,$9,$10,$11,$12 }' ${NLAP_TEMP}/hist1.out|sort -T ${NLAP_TEMP} |uniq>... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: Peu Mukherjee
13 Replies
RENICE(1)						    BSD General Commands Manual 						 RENICE(1)

NAME
renice -- alter priority of running processes SYNOPSIS
renice [-n] priority [[-p] pid ...] [[-g] pgrp ...] [[-u] user ...] renice -h | -v DESCRIPTION
Renice alters the scheduling priority of one or more running processes. The following who parameters are interpreted as process ID's, process group ID's, or user names. Renice'ing a process group causes all processes in the process group to have their scheduling priority altered. Renice'ing a user causes all processes owned by the user to have their scheduling priority altered. By default, the processes to be affected are specified by their process ID's. Options supported by renice: -n, --priority The scheduling priority of the process, process group, or user. -g, --pgrp Force who parameters to be interpreted as process group ID's. -u, --user Force the who parameters to be interpreted as user names. -p, --pid Resets the who interpretation to be (the default) process ID's. -v, --version Print version. -h, --help Print help. For example, renice +1 987 -u daemon root -p 32 would change the priority of process ID's 987 and 32, and all processes owned by users daemon and root. Users other than the super-user may only alter the priority of processes they own, and can only monotonically increase their ``nice value'' within the range 0 to PRIO_MAX (20). (This prevents overriding administrative fiats.) The super-user may alter the priority of any process and set the priority to any value in the range PRIO_MIN (-20) to PRIO_MAX. Useful priorities are: 20 (the affected processes will run only when nothing else in the system wants to), 0 (the ``base'' scheduling priority), anything negative (to make things go very fast). FILES
/etc/passwd to map user names to user ID's SEE ALSO
getpriority(2), setpriority(2) BUGS
Non super-users can not increase scheduling priorities of their own processes, even if they were the ones that decreased the priorities in the first place. The Linux kernel (at least version 2.0.0) and linux libc (at least version 5.2.18) does not agree entirely on what the specifics of the sys- temcall interface to set nice values is. Thus causes renice to report bogus previous nice values. HISTORY
The renice command appeared in 4.0BSD. AVAILABILITY
The renice command is part of the util-linux-ng package and is available from ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/. 4th Berkeley Distribution June 9, 1993 4th Berkeley Distribution
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy