10-24-2011
What exactly did you do? Show us word for word, letter for letter.
8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators
What happend to profile signatures. don't seems to be displayed in posts for few days. it's not important. but just to know what's wrong with it?
Thanks, (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mib
1 Replies
2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi everybody!
I want to know if someone knows about a program that "inserts" a graphic in the signature of a mail user.
Let me be more clear. I'm mail admin in a company that uses Netscape Messaging Server 4.15, and my boss wants to put a graphic christmas message in all the outgoing mails.
... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: piltrafa
1 Replies
3. Forum Support Area for Unregistered Users & Account Problems
do these forums allow for the user signatures?
I couldn't find anything in my profile, but remember something about signatures when I registered first.
Any info is appreciated.
vlad (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: vgersh99
3 Replies
4. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators
In the user control panel, I noticed an option to enable viewing signatures. But somehow, I could not find any place to set my own signature. :( :confused:
Could anyone tell me where I can find that option? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: aniseed
2 Replies
5. Cybersecurity
This "quiz" was pretty easy (at least for me) and the prize is a trip to RSA.
http://www.messagelabs-quiz.com/Quiz/Index.asp
By the way, did anyone go to this last year? (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: defender77
0 Replies
6. Red Hat
# rpm -ivh telnet-server-0.17-38.el5.i386.rpm
warning: telnet-server-0.17-38.el5.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 37017186
error: Failed dependencies:
xinetd is needed by telnet-server-0.17-38.el5.i386
#
-----------------------------------------------
# yum -y... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: dplinux
2 Replies
7. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators
Hi there
Where can i define a Signature? I can't see any point to do this...
Regards, Jan (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jm83
1 Replies
8. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers
I saw this and am wondering how I can add a signature so it shows on my posts.
Thanks.
Visible Post Elements You have the option to show or hide various elements of messages, which may be of use to users on slow internet... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: drew77
1 Replies
LEARN ABOUT CENTOS
rsa_check_key
RSA_check_key(3) OpenSSL RSA_check_key(3)
NAME
RSA_check_key - validate private RSA keys
SYNOPSIS
#include <openssl/rsa.h>
int RSA_check_key(RSA *rsa);
DESCRIPTION
This function validates RSA keys. It checks that p and q are in fact prime, and that n = p*q.
It also checks that d*e = 1 mod (p-1*q-1), and that dmp1, dmq1 and iqmp are set correctly or are NULL.
As such, this function can not be used with any arbitrary RSA key object, even if it is otherwise fit for regular RSA operation. See NOTES
for more information.
RETURN VALUE
RSA_check_key() returns 1 if rsa is a valid RSA key, and 0 otherwise. -1 is returned if an error occurs while checking the key.
If the key is invalid or an error occurred, the reason code can be obtained using ERR_get_error(3).
NOTES
This function does not work on RSA public keys that have only the modulus and public exponent elements populated. It performs integrity
checks on all the RSA key material, so the RSA key structure must contain all the private key data too.
Unlike most other RSA functions, this function does not work transparently with any underlying ENGINE implementation because it uses the
key data in the RSA structure directly. An ENGINE implementation can override the way key data is stored and handled, and can even provide
support for HSM keys - in which case the RSA structure may contain no key data at all! If the ENGINE in question is only being used for
acceleration or analysis purposes, then in all likelihood the RSA key data is complete and untouched, but this can't be assumed in the
general case.
BUGS
A method of verifying the RSA key using opaque RSA API functions might need to be considered. Right now RSA_check_key() simply uses the RSA
structure elements directly, bypassing the RSA_METHOD table altogether (and completely violating encapsulation and object-orientation in
the process). The best fix will probably be to introduce a "check_key()" handler to the RSA_METHOD function table so that alternative
implementations can also provide their own verifiers.
SEE ALSO
rsa(3), ERR_get_error(3)
HISTORY
RSA_check_key() appeared in OpenSSL 0.9.4.
1.0.1e 2013-02-11 RSA_check_key(3)