Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: mdadm question
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users mdadm question Post 302555364 by rmokros on Wednesday 14th of September 2011 02:24:10 PM
Old 09-14-2011
still not running

cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid10]
unused devices: <none>

mdadm --assemble -v /dev/md126 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde --run
mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md126
mdadm: /dev/sdb is identified as a member of /dev/md126, slot -1.
mdadm: /dev/sdc is identified as a member of /dev/md126, slot -1.
mdadm: /dev/sdd is identified as a member of /dev/md126, slot -1.
mdadm: /dev/sde is identified as a member of /dev/md126, slot -1.
mdadm: added /dev/sdc to /dev/md126 as -1
mdadm: added /dev/sdd to /dev/md126 as -1
mdadm: added /dev/sde to /dev/md126 as -1
mdadm: added /dev/sdb to /dev/md126 as -1
mdadm: Container /dev/md126 has been assembled with 4 drives

cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid10]
md126 : inactive sdb[3](S) sde[2](S) sdd[1](S) sdc[0](S)
9028 blocks super external:imsm
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Linux

mdadm - Swapping 500GB disks for 1TB

Hi, I have a three disk raid 5, with 500GB disks. This is close to being full, and whilst I can just add another disk and rebuild to add another 500GB, I would prefer to replace with 1TB disks. So i have some questions. Can I replace these disks one by one with bigger disks? I... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: snoop2048
1 Replies

2. Virtualization and Cloud Computing

is mdadm --incremental --rebuild --run --scan destructive?

Hello Unix Community: My task to figure out how to add a 20G volume to an existing EBS Array (RAID0) at AWS. I haven't been told that growing the existing volumes isn't an option, or adding another larger volume to the existing array is the way to go. The client's existing data-store is... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Habitual
0 Replies

3. Emergency UNIX and Linux Support

mdadm unable to fail a resyncing drive?

Hi All I have a RAID 5 array consisting of 4 drives that had a partial drive failure in one of the drives. Rebooting shows the faulty drive as background rebuilding and mdadm /dev/ARRAYID shows three drives as in sync with the fourth drive as spare rebuilding. However the array won't come... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: Bashingaway
9 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

mdadm container! How does it work

Hi everyone, I am not sure if I understand how mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=container works? A device called /dev/md0 appears in /proc/mdstat but I am not sure how to use that device? I have 2 blank drives with 1 500GB partition on each. I would like to setup mirroring, but not in the... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: hytron
0 Replies

5. Red Hat

mdadm for / and /boot

had this RHEL 5 installation with /dev/sda1 and /dev/sda2 running.. created two more partitions /dev/sdj1 and /dev/sdj2 , the same sized partition as /dev/sda trying to use mdadm to create RAID1 .. I cannot even do it in "rescue" mode, I wonder if it can be done.. it kept... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ppchu99
2 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

USB RAID 5 Problem on Joli OS 1.2 (Ubuntu) using mdadm

Hi All, I have been trying to create a USB RAID 5 using mdadm tool on Joli OS 1.2 (Ubuntu) but with no luck. I cannot even get pass the creation of array device (/dev/md0) and superblock. I am using 3 USB keys (2 16.4 GB kingston and 1 16GB sandisk). My steps are: ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: powelltallen
5 Replies

7. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

MDADM Failure - where it came from?

Hello, i have a system with 6 sata3 seagate st3000dm01 disks running on stable Debian with software raid mdadm. i have md0 for root and md1 for swap and md2 for the files. i now want to add one more disk = sdh4 for md2 but i got this errors: The new disk is connected to an 4 port sata... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: Sunghost
7 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

How to fix mistake on raid: mdadm create instead of assemble?

Hi guys, I'm new to RAID although I've had a server running raid5 for a while. It was delivered preinstalled like this and I never really wondered how to monitor and maintain it. This quick introduction just to let you understand why I'm such an idiot asking such a silly question. Now what... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: chebarbudo
0 Replies
bup-margin(1)						      General Commands Manual						     bup-margin(1)

NAME
bup-margin - figure out your deduplication safety margin SYNOPSIS
bup margin [options...] DESCRIPTION
bup margin iterates through all objects in your bup repository, calculating the largest number of prefix bits shared between any two entries. This number, n, identifies the longest subset of SHA-1 you could use and still encounter a collision between your object ids. For example, one system that was tested had a collection of 11 million objects (70 GB), and bup margin returned 45. That means a 46-bit hash would be sufficient to avoid all collisions among that set of objects; each object in that repository could be uniquely identified by its first 46 bits. The number of bits needed seems to increase by about 1 or 2 for every doubling of the number of objects. Since SHA-1 hashes have 160 bits, that leaves 115 bits of margin. Of course, because SHA-1 hashes are essentially random, it's theoretically possible to use many more bits with far fewer objects. If you're paranoid about the possibility of SHA-1 collisions, you can monitor your repository by running bup margin occasionally to see if you're getting dangerously close to 160 bits. OPTIONS
--predict Guess the offset into each index file where a particular object will appear, and report the maximum deviation of the correct answer from the guess. This is potentially useful for tuning an interpolation search algorithm. --ignore-midx don't use .midx files, use only .idx files. This is only really useful when used with --predict. EXAMPLE
$ bup margin Reading indexes: 100.00% (1612581/1612581), done. 40 40 matching prefix bits 1.94 bits per doubling 120 bits (61.86 doublings) remaining 4.19338e+18 times larger is possible Everyone on earth could have 625878182 data sets like yours, all in one repository, and we would expect 1 object collision. $ bup margin --predict PackIdxList: using 1 index. Reading indexes: 100.00% (1612581/1612581), done. 915 of 1612581 (0.057%) SEE ALSO
bup-midx(1), bup-save(1) BUP
Part of the bup(1) suite. AUTHORS
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>. Bup unknown- bup-margin(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:38 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy