Hi,
Tried to look for solution, and found something similar but could not adapt the solution for my needs..
I'm trying to match a pattern (in this case "ProcessType")in a logfile, then delete that line and the 4 following lines.
The logfile looks as follows:
ProcessType: PROCESS_A... (5 Replies)
I need to delete rows based on the number of lines in a different file, I have a piece of code with me working but when I merge with my C application, it doesnt work.
sed '1,'\"`wc -l < /tmp/fileyyyy`\"'d' /tmp/fileA > /tmp/filexxxx
Can anyone give me an alternate solution for the above (2 Replies)
Hi every body
I have some text file with a lots of duplicate rows like this:
165.179.568.197
154.893.836.174
242.473.396.153
165.179.568.197
165.179.568.197
165.179.568.197
154.893.836.174
how can I delete the repeated rows?
Thanks
Saeideh (2 Replies)
How to delete ending/trailing spaces using awk,sed,perl?
Input:(each line has extra spaces at the end)
3456 565
3 7
35 878
Expected output:
3456 565
3 7
35 878 (5 Replies)
I have some xml files that cannot be read using a standard parser, or I am using the wrong parser. The issues seems to be spaces in some of the tags.
Here is a sample,<UgUn 2 >
<Un>
-0.426753
</Un>
</UgUn>The parser isn't able to find the number 2, so that information is lost, etc. It seems... (16 Replies)
Hello all
According to the following file (orignal one contains 200x times the same structure...) I was wondering if someone could help me to print <byte>??</byte> values
example, running this script/command like
./script.sh xxapp
I would expect as output: 102 116 112
./script.sh xxapp2... (2 Replies)
Hi
I need to delete lines from a file which are after pattern1 and between pattern 2 and patter3, as below:
aaaaaaaa
bbbbbbbb
pattern1
cdededed
ddededed
pattern2
fefefefe <-----Delete this line
efefefef <-----Delete this line
pattern3
adsffdsd
huaserew
Please can you suggest... (6 Replies)
Hi All,
I need help from any of you.Would be so thankful for your help.
I/P
DDDD,1045,161,1557,429,1694,800,1911,1113,2460,1457,2917>
1609,3113,1869,3317,2732,3701,3727,4132,5857,5107>
9004,6496
DDDD,1125,157,1558,429,1694,800,1911,1117,2432,1444,2906>... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Indra2011
2 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
px_get_record2
PX_GET_RECORD2(3) Library Functions Manual PX_GET_RECORD2(3)NAME
PX_get_record2 -- Returns record in Paradox file
SYNOPSIS
#include <paradox.h>
int PX_get_record2(pxdoc_t *pxdoc, int recno, char *data, int *deleted, pxdatablockinfo_t *pxdbinfo)
DESCRIPTION
This function is similar to PX_get_record(3) but takes two extra parameters. If *deleted is set to 1 the function will consider any record
in the database, even those which are deleted. If *pxdbinfo is not NULL, the function will return some information about the data block
where the record has been read from. You will have to allocate memory for pxdbinfo before calling PX_get_record2.
On return *deleted will be set to 1 if the requested record is deleted or 0 if it is not deleted. The struct pxdatablockinfo_t has the fol-
lowing fields:
blockpos (long)
File positon where the block starts. The first six bytes of the block contain the header, followed by the record data.
recordpos (long)
File position where the requested record starts.
size (int)
Size of the data block without the six bytes for the header.
recno (int)
Record number within the data block. The first record in the block has number 0.
numrecords (int)
The number of records in this block.
number (int)
The number of the data block.
This function may return records with invalid data, because records are not explizitly marked as deleted, but rather the size of a valid
data block is modified. A data block is a fixed size area in the file which holds a certain number of records. If for some reason a data
block has newer been completely filled with records, the algorithmn anticipates deleted records in this data block, which are not there.
This often happens with the last data block in a file, which is likely to not being fully filled with records.
If you accessing several records, do it in ascending order, because this is the most efficient way.
Note:
This function is deprecated. Use PX_retrieve_record(3) instead
RETURN VALUE
Returns 0 on success and -1 on failure.
SEE ALSO PX_get_field(3), PX_get_record(3)AUTHOR
This manual page was written by Uwe Steinmann uwe@steinmann.cx.
PX_GET_RECORD2(3)