Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Bizarre Sun T5240 behavior
Operating Systems Solaris Bizarre Sun T5240 behavior Post 302544409 by pyroman on Wednesday 3rd of August 2011 04:22:22 PM
Old 08-03-2011
Bizarre Sun T5240 behavior

Thanks DGPickett - I'll check it out.
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Weird behavior on a Sun Fire V120 running solaris 10.

All, After a power loss I went to power on our sun fire v120 that is running solaris 10 and now it will not boot. I tried power cycling it from the lom and pulling the cord but nothing works. All it does is after a power cycle it will start to boot and then start to spit out a bunch of hex... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jsandova
2 Replies

2. Solaris

raidctl on SUN T5240

Setting up a T5240 with two disks c1t0d0 and c1t1d0. I am trying to use raidctl but when I issue. raidctl -l I get Controller 1 Disk: 0.0.0 Disk: 0.1.0 So I try raidctl -c '0.0.0 0.1.0' -r 1 1 and I get "Array in use." I try (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: photon
4 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

bash-function with array acting bizarre, bug?

Hello, basically what this script is supposed to do is showing a list of hosts that is given a number, that you will be able to choose from a list. A check is made to verify that the chosen number is within the array and this is where things go bad and I don't know why, bizarre. I've spent... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: gand
5 Replies

4. Solaris

cannot plumb nxge on T5240

its a fresh installation. during the OS setup, it did not prompt for IP, netmask and gateway. using Solaris 10 08/07 update 4. I tried to plumb manually but encountered no such interface error. but nxge interfaces can be greped from the /etc/path_to_inst file. getting similar error on... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: incredible
3 Replies

5. Solaris

Raidctl - Sun T5240 Solaris 10 Problem

I tried using raidctl earlier today to use my 2 disks in a RAID1 setup and I totally destroyed my OS install. I'm sure I did something funky and it freaked out. No big deal...right? This is what I was seeing after a reboot. I decided to just reinstall the OS. It let me go through all of... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: kingdbag
3 Replies

6. Solaris

SUN T5240 vs M3000

Hi, We are planning to buy new server for our data center. Sun T5240 or M3000 which one have better performance, we are going to create many dt sessions in this server. So, i need your suggestions. RJS (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: rajasekg
4 Replies

7. Solaris

ufsrestore T5240

Hi Friends we have sun T5240 server, we have taken ufsdump of this server remotely with scsi tapedrive, If we need to do ufsrestore means what we have to do, since T5240 has not having scsi port, any procedure is there? Regards Rajasekar (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: rajasekg
5 Replies

8. Solaris

Cannot configure RAID on T5240

Hi ! I've been given a T5240 with 4 disks and 2 HBA cards (but no array connected). I did a factory reset on SP and NVRAM clean on OBP because the server had been used before. I boot cdrom in single mode and try to create a hw mirror with disks from c1... but only c2 is seen by raidctl. ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: delavega
2 Replies

9. Solaris

Using a Modem on a T5-2 or a T5240

Hi Folks, Just a quick question - hopefully! I have an application currently running on a V890 with Solaris 9, I'd like to move this to either one of our T-5's or one of the T5240's in a Legacy container on an LDOM - but the fly in the ointment is the application still uses a standard Hayes... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: gull04
3 Replies
socklog-check(8)					      System Manager's Manual						  socklog-check(8)

NAME
socklog-check - checks for the availability of a socklog(8) service. SYNOPSIS
socklog-check [-v] [unix [address]] DESCRIPTION
socklog-check attempts to connect to a socklog(8) unix service and reports whether the connection attempt succeeded or not. It connects to the datagram oriented unix domain socket address, and reports success through the return code. If address is not specified, socklog-check attempts to connect to /dev/log. When running services that use the syslog facility under runit's service supervision, socklog-check should be added to the top of the ser- vice's run script to ensure that no syslog messages are generated until a syslog service is up and running to process the messages, e.g.: #!/bin/sh socklog-check || exit 1 exec service_using_syslog OPTIONS
-v verbose. Print verbose message to standard error. EXIT CODES
On success socklog-check returns 0. On error, socklog-check prints a message to standard error and exits 111. SEE ALSO
socklog(8), socklog-conf(8), svlogd(8), tryto(1), uncat(1), sv(8), runsv(8), runsvdir(8) http://smarden.org/socklog/ http://smarden.org/runit/ AUTHOR
Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org> socklog-check(8)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy