Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming Problem with Pipes => Only works first pipe Post 302535683 by DGPickett on Friday 1st of July 2011 11:34:19 AM
Old 07-01-2011
The usual thing is to pipe, fork, the child closes the parent end and writes or reads his end, the parent closes the child end and writes or reads his end. If you want it be be stdin or stdout, you close std* and dup pipe and close pipe. If you are gutless, you use dup2. You do know pipe() makes unidirectional pipes? Once you have the fds all set up, then you select() or poll(). Pipes will say they are writable until they fill, so you may not want to include them except when you have something to write. They will say they are readable until they are empty. Why not add some logging for debug?

Last edited by DGPickett; 07-01-2011 at 12:43 PM..
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

PIPEs and Named PIPEs (FIFO) Buffer size

Hello! How I can increase or decrease predefined pipe buffer size? System FreeBSD 4.9 and RedHat Linux 9.0 Thanks! (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Jus
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Plink problem....only works if passwd is in the script

I have a one line bat script run off a XP machine that tar's and compresses some files from a Sol 8 box. It goes something like this (a bit simplified).... plink -pw <passwd> user@host "tar -cvf - -C / tmp/a_file | compress " > a_file.tar.Z So this works....and it's worked many times. But now... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Yinzer955i
3 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

problem with pipes

I have written the following program. The function of this prog is to read data from a file(source.c) and write into another file(dest.c) using pipes. I have just written a line in the source file.Im able to compile and run the program without errors. But the data is not written onto the other... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: afser
2 Replies

4. Programming

Pipe problem

Could anyone tell me whats wrong whit this piping? the commands that they execute are correct. the command I am trying is ls|wc. Both processes go to the right if statement. for(i=0;i<argc;i++){ if(i==0&&argc>1){//first command if(pipe(pipa1)==-1) ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: isato
2 Replies

5. Homework & Coursework Questions

How join works and the specific parameters to my problem?

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data: I have two files created from extracting data off of two CSV files, one containing class enrollment on a specific quarter and the other containing grades for that specific quarter. The Enrollment file generated contains course name,... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: Lechnology
11 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Problem with pipes on infinite streams

Here is an example code that shows the issue I have: #!/bin/bash counter() { seq 1000 | while read NUM; do echo $NUM echo "debug: $NUM" >&2 sleep 0.1 # slow it down so we know when this loop really ends done } counter | grep --line-buffered "" | head -n1 ... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: tokland
10 Replies

7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

sendmails works, but opens 43 file handles per email -> problem

I'm using Sendmail 8.13.8 on a CentOS 5.5 vServer (Virtuozzo). I'm using a loop in PHP to send a lot of HTML-mails via sendmail. Each mail is a mail with individual statistics for our users, so its not mass mailing, bcc is not an option. It all works fine, but when I take a closer look there... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ZX81
2 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

The problem of pipe

Hi,guys: I want to use c to implement a pipe. For example: ps auxwww | grep fred | more I forked three child processes. Each is responsible for each command, and pipe to next one. for(i=0;i<2;i++) pipe(fd) if(child==1) // child 1 { close(1) dup2(fd,1) close(fd) }... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: tomlee
3 Replies

9. Programming

Problem with pipes

problem solved. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: superfons
1 Replies

10. Programming

please help a problem in client-server ipc message 2 pipes communication simple example

I want to have a message send & receive through 2 half-duplex pipes Flow of data top half pipe stdin--->parent(client) fd1--->pipe1-->child(server) fd1 bottom half pipe child(server) fd2---->pipe2--->parent(client) fd2--->stdout I need to have boundary structed message... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ouou
1 Replies
PIPE(7) 						     Linux Programmer's Manual							   PIPE(7)

NAME
pipe - overview of pipes and FIFOs DESCRIPTION
Pipes and FIFOs (also known as named pipes) provide a unidirectional interprocess communication channel. A pipe has a read end and a write end. Data written to the write end of a pipe can be read from the read end of the pipe. A pipe is created using pipe(2), which creates a new pipe and returns two file descriptors, one referring to the read end of the pipe, the other referring to the write end. Pipes can be used to create a communication channel between related processes; see pipe(2) for an exam- ple. A FIFO (short for First In First Out) has a name within the filesystem (created using mkfifo(3)), and is opened using open(2). Any process may open a FIFO, assuming the file permissions allow it. The read end is opened using the O_RDONLY flag; the write end is opened using the O_WRONLY flag. See fifo(7) for further details. Note: although FIFOs have a pathname in the filesystem, I/O on FIFOs does not involve operations on the underlying device (if there is one). I/O on pipes and FIFOs The only difference between pipes and FIFOs is the manner in which they are created and opened. Once these tasks have been accomplished, I/O on pipes and FIFOs has exactly the same semantics. If a process attempts to read from an empty pipe, then read(2) will block until data is available. If a process attempts to write to a full pipe (see below), then write(2) blocks until sufficient data has been read from the pipe to allow the write to complete. Nonblocking I/O is possible by using the fcntl(2) F_SETFL operation to enable the O_NONBLOCK open file status flag. The communication channel provided by a pipe is a byte stream: there is no concept of message boundaries. If all file descriptors referring to the write end of a pipe have been closed, then an attempt to read(2) from the pipe will see end-of- file (read(2) will return 0). If all file descriptors referring to the read end of a pipe have been closed, then a write(2) will cause a SIGPIPE signal to be generated for the calling process. If the calling process is ignoring this signal, then write(2) fails with the error EPIPE. An application that uses pipe(2) and fork(2) should use suitable close(2) calls to close unnecessary duplicate file descriptors; this ensures that end-of-file and SIGPIPE/EPIPE are delivered when appropriate. It is not possible to apply lseek(2) to a pipe. Pipe capacity A pipe has a limited capacity. If the pipe is full, then a write(2) will block or fail, depending on whether the O_NONBLOCK flag is set (see below). Different implementations have different limits for the pipe capacity. Applications should not rely on a particular capac- ity: an application should be designed so that a reading process consumes data as soon as it is available, so that a writing process does not remain blocked. In Linux versions before 2.6.11, the capacity of a pipe was the same as the system page size (e.g., 4096 bytes on i386). Since Linux 2.6.11, the pipe capacity is 65536 bytes. PIPE_BUF POSIX.1-2001 says that write(2)s of less than PIPE_BUF bytes must be atomic: the output data is written to the pipe as a contiguous sequence. Writes of more than PIPE_BUF bytes may be nonatomic: the kernel may interleave the data with data written by other processes. POSIX.1-2001 requires PIPE_BUF to be at least 512 bytes. (On Linux, PIPE_BUF is 4096 bytes.) The precise semantics depend on whether the file descriptor is nonblocking (O_NONBLOCK), whether there are multiple writers to the pipe, and on n, the number of bytes to be written: O_NONBLOCK disabled, n <= PIPE_BUF All n bytes are written atomically; write(2) may block if there is not room for n bytes to be written immediately O_NONBLOCK enabled, n <= PIPE_BUF If there is room to write n bytes to the pipe, then write(2) succeeds immediately, writing all n bytes; otherwise write(2) fails, with errno set to EAGAIN. O_NONBLOCK disabled, n > PIPE_BUF The write is nonatomic: the data given to write(2) may be interleaved with write(2)s by other process; the write(2) blocks until n bytes have been written. O_NONBLOCK enabled, n > PIPE_BUF If the pipe is full, then write(2) fails, with errno set to EAGAIN. Otherwise, from 1 to n bytes may be written (i.e., a "partial write" may occur; the caller should check the return value from write(2) to see how many bytes were actually written), and these bytes may be interleaved with writes by other processes. Open file status flags The only open file status flags that can be meaningfully applied to a pipe or FIFO are O_NONBLOCK and O_ASYNC. Setting the O_ASYNC flag for the read end of a pipe causes a signal (SIGIO by default) to be generated when new input becomes available on the pipe (see fcntl(2) for details). On Linux, O_ASYNC is supported for pipes and FIFOs only since kernel 2.6. Portability notes On some systems (but not Linux), pipes are bidirectional: data can be transmitted in both directions between the pipe ends. According to POSIX.1-2001, pipes only need to be unidirectional. Portable applications should avoid reliance on bidirectional pipe semantics. SEE ALSO
dup(2), fcntl(2), open(2), pipe(2), poll(2), select(2), socketpair(2), stat(2), mkfifo(3), epoll(7), fifo(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.55 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2005-12-08 PIPE(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy