06-15-2011
That worked ! Thank you very much.
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I am trying to get a list of top level directories below the search path but I don't want to descend subdirectories. The find command listed below returns me the list I want but it also returns subdirectories. I can't seem to get the -prune option to work the way I want. How would I modify the... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: FuzzySlippers
5 Replies
2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi,
I'm using the following command to get a list of files on the system.
find /releases -type f -exec ls -l > /home/sebarry/list.txt '{}' \;
however, its searching a directory I don't want it to search so I know I have to use prune but I don't seem to be able to get prune and exec to work... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Sebarry
1 Replies
3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I have a directory named https-abcd
Under that I have some directories, files and links.
One of those directories is with name logs and the logs directory has lot of files in it.
I need to tar the whole https-abcd directory excluding the logs directory only, I should get all the links, files and... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: venu_nbk
2 Replies
4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi,
I am using a find command like below in my script:
find /outfiles -type f -name cat -o -name vi -o -name grep 2>/dev/null
Which will search for files like "cat" , "vi" or "grep" in the "/outfiles" and subdirectories.
I want to ignore a particular subdirectory from the search. I... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: deepakgang
4 Replies
5. Solaris
I know one of the more seasoned veterans probably opened this thread looking for their chance to refer me to the site's search feature and let me tell you.
I'VE LOOKED!!!! And I didn't find anything helpful...
So, I've got a windows background and I'm fond of its search feature which comes... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: ProGrammar
6 Replies
6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi , Kindly help me out .:)
i want to find only the file t4 in directory t3. i am in dir t . the tree is as follows.
if i give,
find .
o/p is
.
./t4
./t1
./t1/t2
./t1/t2/t3
./t1/t2/t3/t4
./t1/t2/t4
./t1/t4
directories are like t/t1/t2/t3 and each directory has file t4.
my... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: bhuvaneshlal
7 Replies
7. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi,
I want to list files only from the current dir and its child dir (not from child's child dir).
i have the following files,
./ABC/1.log
./ABC/2.log
./ABC/ABC1/A.log
./ABC/ABC1/B.log
./ABC/ABC1/XYZ/A1.log
./ABC/ABC1/XYZ/A2.log
Here i want to list only the log file from current... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: apsprabhu
1 Replies
8. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi
I have a directory say mydir and inside it there are many files and subdirectories and also a directory called lost+found owned by root user
I want to print all files directories and subdirectorres from my directory using find command except lost+found
If i do
find . \( -name... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: xiamin
3 Replies
9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hello, I am using ksh93 (/usr/dt/bin/dtksh) on Solaris and am stuck when trying to use find with the -prune option.
I need to search a directory (supplied in a variable) for files matching a certain pattern, but ignore any sub-directories.
I have tried:
find ${full_path_to_dir_to_search}... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: gary_w
9 Replies
10. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers
I need to delete all files from the working directory and its sub directories using the find command, for that I am using -prune option but some how I am having a syntax issue.
I have tried the below, please help me correct the syntax
find . -name \* -type f -exec rm -f {} \; >> Works but... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: rosebud123
4 Replies
LEARN ABOUT CENTOS
git-pack-refs
GIT-PACK-REFS(1) Git Manual GIT-PACK-REFS(1)
NAME
git-pack-refs - Pack heads and tags for efficient repository access
SYNOPSIS
git pack-refs [--all] [--no-prune]
DESCRIPTION
Traditionally, tips of branches and tags (collectively known as refs) were stored one file per ref in a (sub)directory under $GIT_DIR/refs
directory. While many branch tips tend to be updated often, most tags and some branch tips are never updated. When a repository has
hundreds or thousands of tags, this one-file-per-ref format both wastes storage and hurts performance.
This command is used to solve the storage and performance problem by storing the refs in a single file, $GIT_DIR/packed-refs. When a ref is
missing from the traditional $GIT_DIR/refs directory hierarchy, it is looked up in this file and used if found.
Subsequent updates to branches always create new files under $GIT_DIR/refs directory hierarchy.
A recommended practice to deal with a repository with too many refs is to pack its refs with --all --prune once, and occasionally run git
pack-refs --prune. Tags are by definition stationary and are not expected to change. Branch heads will be packed with the initial pack-refs
--all, but only the currently active branch heads will become unpacked, and the next pack-refs (without --all) will leave them unpacked.
OPTIONS
--all
The command by default packs all tags and refs that are already packed, and leaves other refs alone. This is because branches are
expected to be actively developed and packing their tips does not help performance. This option causes branch tips to be packed as
well. Useful for a repository with many branches of historical interests.
--no-prune
The command usually removes loose refs under $GIT_DIR/refs hierarchy after packing them. This option tells it not to.
BUGS
Older documentation written before the packed-refs mechanism was introduced may still say things like ".git/refs/heads/<branch> file
exists" when it means "branch <branch> exists".
GIT
Part of the git(1) suite
Git 1.8.3.1 06/10/2014 GIT-PACK-REFS(1)