|
|
Sponsored Content
Operating Systems
Linux
Android
Will You Move to an Android Phone or Tablet?
Post 302484617 by Neo on Sunday 2nd of January 2011 03:36:04 AM
01-02-2011
Administrator
A Java paradigm on Linux for mobile applications is very powerful. It is just a matter of time when Android for tablets comes out (scheduled for 1Q 2011) and we are only seeing the beginning.
There is minimal overall computing difference between writing a C program and compiling it, versus writing a Java program and compiling it. The main difference is that, for the foreseeable future, Android Java programs will be developed "off platform" and then installed (on a table, on a mobile), whereas Linux/Unix can easily develop and compile "on platform".
However, this will change over time, especially as tablets become more mainstream, larger screens, external bluetooth keyboards and mice, etc. Smart phones and tablets are amazing. We are only in the early stages of a computing revolution, where much of what we need for personal and business communications is in tables and phones.
FWIW, I will buy a new Android tablet after the release of Android-for-tablets. I was going to get one this year, a Galaxy Tab, but decided to wait until 2011 after Android 3.0 is adopted for tables (or at least a version of Android for tablets). I would develop some apps on Android now, but I still have a legacy OSX PPC on my desk which is not very suitable (and not supported).
PS: Yes, I have some some development in Java when I worked as a principle architect large s/w company in Palo Alto. I have worked in both Java and C in the past; but mostly in PHP these days
---------- Post updated at 08:36 ---------- Previous update was at 08:28 ----------
I don't see anything fundamentally wrong with a GUI on a platform designed to be manipulated with our finger and not a mouse or traditional keyboard, BTW.
It is simply a different user interface model. It is a model which many people like, considering smart phones and tables were the hottest gadgets on the market in 2010 and destined to be even hotter in 2011.
There is minimal overall computing difference between writing a C program and compiling it, versus writing a Java program and compiling it. The main difference is that, for the foreseeable future, Android Java programs will be developed "off platform" and then installed (on a table, on a mobile), whereas Linux/Unix can easily develop and compile "on platform".
However, this will change over time, especially as tablets become more mainstream, larger screens, external bluetooth keyboards and mice, etc. Smart phones and tablets are amazing. We are only in the early stages of a computing revolution, where much of what we need for personal and business communications is in tables and phones.
FWIW, I will buy a new Android tablet after the release of Android-for-tablets. I was going to get one this year, a Galaxy Tab, but decided to wait until 2011 after Android 3.0 is adopted for tables (or at least a version of Android for tablets). I would develop some apps on Android now, but I still have a legacy OSX PPC on my desk which is not very suitable (and not supported).
PS: Yes, I have some some development in Java when I worked as a principle architect large s/w company in Palo Alto. I have worked in both Java and C in the past; but mostly in PHP these days
---------- Post updated at 08:36 ---------- Previous update was at 08:28 ----------
I don't see anything fundamentally wrong with a GUI on a platform designed to be manipulated with our finger and not a mouse or traditional keyboard, BTW.
It is simply a different user interface model. It is a model which many people like, considering smart phones and tables were the hottest gadgets on the market in 2010 and destined to be even hotter in 2011.
|
|
4 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Android
I just upgraded to Android 2.2 from 2.1. The GPS issue that was troublesome in 2.1 seems to have been fixed. Some of web browsing seems faster, but it could just be my connection is better today ;) Flash works in some browsers but not very good and it is too slow for Flash apps designed for... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
0 Replies
2. What is on Your Mind?
Currently in the process of looking for a tablet. Which one is best? Thanks Benjamin Mauerberger (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: hlinks12
9 Replies
3. Solaris
I'm trying to sync/transfer files from my UNIX box and Android Phone and vice versa.
I know that Android Phones show up seamlessly (mostly) in Linux given their incestuous relationship.
Is there a way to do it in UNIX or more specifically in Solaris 11.3 (i86)?:confused:
I haven't found one... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Nostradamus1973
2 Replies
4. Emergency UNIX and Linux Support
thanks (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: jgt
6 Replies
LEARN ABOUT OPENSOLARIS
phones
phones(4) File Formats phones(4) NAME
phones - remote host phone number database SYNOPSIS
/etc/phones DESCRIPTION
The file /etc/phones contains the system-wide private phone numbers for the tip(1) program. /etc/phones is normally unreadable, and so may contain privileged information. The format of /etc/phones is a series of lines of the form: <system-name>[ ]*<phone-number>. The system name is one of those defined in the remote(4) file and the phone number is constructed from [0123456789-=*%]. The `=' and `*' characters are indicators to the auto call units to pause and wait for a second dial tone (when going through an exchange). The `=' is required by the DF02-AC and the `*' is required by the BIZCOMP 1030. Comment lines are lines containing a `#' sign in the first column of the line. Only one phone number per line is permitted. However, if more than one line in the file contains the same system name tip(1) will attempt to dial each one in turn, until it establishes a connection. FILES
/etc/phones SEE ALSO
tip(1), remote(4) SunOS 5.11 14 Jan 1992 phones(4)