Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Memory addressing question
Top Forums Programming Memory addressing question Post 302461851 by JohnGraham on Tuesday 12th of October 2010 02:16:35 PM
Old 10-12-2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevenswj
Any time you obtain a stack address from a pointer, what is this relative to by default? Is it the extra segment, the stack segment, what?
In what context are you talking? C or some other high-level language, or assembler? If it's the former, addresses aren't relative to anything - they should be taken as absolute (though in reality they're virtual addresses, not absolute physical addresses). Applications at this level don't have to deal with segments at all.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. IP Networking

Dual IP addressing

I have a Unix application server with an internet IP address on it for a gateway and a Unix web server with the Internet IP as well configured for its gateway. Now the problem I have is this: due to these gateways, the application server can't communicate with our internal LAN. Therefore, it... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Ronny
2 Replies

2. Linux

Linux IP addressing Problem

hello, we are having a LAN of about 100 nodes each installed with windows 2000. the default gateway ip address of each system has been assigned the IP of a personal router which connects us to the internet. and offcourse there are a few DNS address also. the ip address range from 192.168.1.1 to... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: vibhory2j
5 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

memory question

Following is the result of commands vmstat and free, on a linux machine: $ vmstat procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- -----cpu------ r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st 0 0 40 207344 135724 3234048 0 0 ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: fredao
1 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Memory utilization question

Hi All I have a clarification. I am running a database on CentOS 4.5 final, PostgreSQL version 8.1.9. The question is about memory usage on the system. The memory used statistic has risen consistently over the past few days... by about 2-3% a day. I want to know why this memory is growing.... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: skotapal
1 Replies

5. High Performance Computing

Newbie question about using a Cluster: using memory

Newbie question about clusters and memory. Is there a way using a cluster (or any other Linux feature/technology) where I can link up a bunch of PCs such that an app thinks it has more memory than available on just one local machine? For example, we have multiple surplus PCs with 512MB RAM... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: joespr
8 Replies

6. What is on Your Mind?

Electronic Mail Addressing

"A Directory of Electronic Mail Addressing & Networks" by Donnalyn Frey and Rick Adams (O'Reilly & Associates, 1993), Xerox Grapevine, DECNET. The book tells about lots of different ways to present an email address. What i know of are Internet (user@host), UUCP (host!user) and DECNET (host::user)... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Action
2 Replies

7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Linux Virtual Memory Question

Hello, I am trying to understand the VIRT field that shows in the TOP command output. I have a users application that appears to be leaking memory. I see that the field VIRT in the top output is showing 55.8g. The question is where is that getting stored? The disk does not appear to have... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: jaysunn
7 Replies

8. IP Networking

Addressing question

This is probably a stupid question but I am finding a tricky issue on my Solaris machines right now. I changed the hostname for my servers as requested by my superior. I had one server that lost it's entire network configuration when I rebooted. I reconfigured it with it's address and I can... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: lnxjenn
2 Replies

9. AIX

Question about reserved memory

Hi! maybe a stupid question but i recall fixing this issue before (or something similar), On one of my frames I have a huge amount of reserved memory. 25GB to be exact. I am running out of memory and need to add a new lpar. I can't remember exactly how i fixed this issue before and it's... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: vpundit
2 Replies

10. Solaris

Solaris memory question...

On my Solaris 10 server we are having memory issue. I did top and I see this. last pid: 8876; load avg: 0.19, 0.16, 0.16; up 50+05:24:02 14:56:53 80 processes: 77 sleeping, 1 stopped, 2 on cpu CPU states: 93.5% idle, 3.1% user, 3.4%... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: samnyc
4 Replies
maxssiz(5)							File Formats Manual							maxssiz(5)

NAME
maxssiz, maxssiz_64bit - maximum size (in bytes) of the stack for any user process VALUES
Default Allowed values DESCRIPTION
User programs on HP-UX systems are composed of five discrete segments of virtual memory: text (or code), data, stack, shared, and I/O. Each segment occupies an architecturally defined range of the virtual address space which sets the upper limit to their size. However, text, data, and stack segments may have a smaller maximum enforced via the and tunables. and define the maximum size of the stack segment for 32-bit and 64-bit processes. The stack segment contains the actual program stack and the storage space for registers on a process or thread context switch. Who is Expected to Change This Tunable? Anyone. Restrictions on Changing Changes to this tunable take effect only for processes started after the modification. In addition, a process which modifies its for the stack segment propagates the modified limit to all child processes, thereby exempting them from any future modification of The value speci- fied is expected to be a multiple of the base page size. See the description of getconf(1) for more details. If the value specified is not a multiple of the base page size, it will be rounded down to the nearest multiple of the base page size. When Should the Value of This Tunable Be Raised? should be raised if user processes are generating the console error message: Processes generating this error message will likely terminate with the segmentation violation error and dump core. What Are the Side Effects of Raising the Value? Raising this tunable by definition allows larger stack segments for every process. This means that and function as limitations on the amount of swap space that can be reserved or used by each process. Therefore, using more virtual address space does not translate directly to using more physical address space because virtual pages can be swapped out. If swap space on the machine is near capacity, raising this tunable increases the amount of reservable swap per process. This could exhaust the swap space on the system by allowing a process with a memory leak or a malicious program that uses huge amounts of memory to reserve too much swap space. It is also important to realize that for 32 bit user processes, data and stack are located contiguously. Raising the amount of virtual address space reserved for the stack segment implies lowering the amount of virtual address space for the data segment. In other words, raising may cause user processes which use all (or nearly all) of the previously available data area to fail allocation with the error even with set above the current amount of memory allocated for data by this process. On will cause an increase in the kernel data structures used to represent the larger stack space. This may use enough additional swap space that the user may see performance degradation or application failure due to lack of reservable swap space. One method to minimize impact is to use a script which launches the applications needing maximum stack size. Within the script, raise the value of launch the application, and then lower to its previous value. This will allow the specific application to benefit from the increased stack size but will not cause additional stack growth for applications which do not need it. When Should the Value of This Tunable Be Lowered? This tunable should be lowered if swap space is at a premium on the machine and programs that are using too much swap space are affecting the execution of other critical user processes. What Are the Side Effects of Lowering the Value? Lowering this tunable will limit the amount of memory available for stack usage per process. This could cause processes with large stack requirements to terminate with a error. What Other Tunable Values Should Be Changed at the Same Time? The tunable should be considered because it also limits swap usage by process data segment. WARNINGS
All HP-UX kernel tunable parameters are release specific. This parameter may be removed or have its meaning changed in future releases of HP-UX. Installation of optional kernel software, from HP or other vendors, may cause changes to tunable parameter values. After installation, some tunable parameters may no longer be at the default or recommended values. For information about the effects of installation on tun- able values, consult the documentation for the kernel software being installed. For information about optional kernel software that was factory installed on your system, see at AUTHOR
was developed by HP. SEE ALSO
getconf(1), maxdsiz(5), maxtsiz(5). Tunable Kernel Parameters maxssiz(5)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy