Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming Fork and then exec problem with signals Post 302460591 by achenle on Thursday 7th of October 2010 05:52:37 AM
Old 10-07-2010
Are execl(), printf(), and sleep() all async-signal safe?

I don't think execl() is, and I'd bet a lot that printf() isn't, and whether or not sleep() is async-signal safe probably depends on the implementation.

And FWIW, the custom signal-handler will not propagate across any of the exec()-type calls:

Quote:
execve() does not return on success, and the text, data, bss, and stack of the calling process are overwritten by that of the program loaded. The program invoked inherits the calling process's PID, and any open file descriptors that are not set to close-on-exec. Signals pending on the calling process are cleared. Any signals set to be caught by the calling process are reset to their default behaviour. The SIGCHLD signal (when set to SIG_IGN) may or may not be reset to SIG_DFL.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Fork and exec

Hello! I am working on a server where I should have 4 (resident)processes, one of them being "the father" of the others, so I do 3 forks. The problem that I have is that I do an accept (for sockets) in the "father" process and I want to transmit the job to one of the processes "child" with... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: driki
3 Replies

2. Programming

Problem with signals - 3 process communication

Hello, I would like to ask you for a little help with program I'm working on. I have problems with signals and synchronizing processes (I'm quite new to this part of programming). Process "parent" creates new child process "child1" and this process creates new child process "child2". The... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Nightwright
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

FORK/EXEC technique

Hi! Can someone explain me exactly this technique? Why a process (PARENT) creates a copy of itself with FORK (CHILD)? What's the reason of this behaviour? Sorry, but I cannot understand the logic behind it. Thanks. (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: marshmallow
4 Replies

4. Programming

fork/exec clobbers write. I need ideas why...

On my *nix box, I have a telegram program. When I go like tel person "la\nla\nla\n" the person sees "la\nla\nla\n" However, when I have a program that forks and execs tel like: pid = fork(); if (pid < 0) { perror("fork failed"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } if (pid == 0) {... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: frequency8
7 Replies

5. Solaris

fork and exec ftp

Hi, I need to find/implement an application that FTPs (puts) all new files in a certain directory to an external storage unit. This application should check for new files every 10 seconds (leaving the FTP connection open in between the 10 seconds). The easiest way would be if there are... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: KittyJ
2 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

fork and exec

I need to ssh to a remote server and run my script there. This is my script. $ssh = "ssh username@host"; $cmd = "$ssh 'cd <my dir> && < sudo Run_exe>'"; my $pid = fork; if ($pid == 0){ exec $cmd; } When I run this I get: pccons_getchar: got r == 0 (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: looza
1 Replies

7. Programming

How forbid use fork() in exec() program.

Hello World! I am writing code in C++ which have to launch another application X using exec(). I would like to set some limits on it using setrlimit etc... My problem is that i don't know how to forbid using fork() and strlimit by application X. How can i do it? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: kzi
3 Replies

8. Programming

Newbie question on exec,fork, wait,pipe C

Hello everybody.I want to make clear that i am not going to ask from anybody to build my asignement but i have a big problem. I can't seem to find anywhere ONE good example on C about what i am trying to do:wall:.I think it is simple. All i ask is one example, even a link is fine. So, i want to... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Cuervo
1 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

fork with exec

What is is difference between 'fork with exec' and 'fork without exec'? How both are related? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kkalyan
1 Replies

10. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Question about global environment variables & fork() exec()

Hello... And thanks in advance for any help anyone can offer me on my question! I've been doing a lot of reading to try and find my answer... But I haven't had any luck What I'm trying to understand is where a child process inherits global environment variables from? I understand the exec()... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: bodisha
2 Replies
SIGNAL(2)						     Linux Programmer's Manual							 SIGNAL(2)

NAME
signal - ANSI C signal handling SYNOPSIS
#include <signal.h> typedef void (*sighandler_t)(int); sighandler_t signal(int signum, sighandler_t handler); DESCRIPTION
The signal() system call installs a new signal handler for the signal with number signum. The signal handler is set to sighandler which may be a user specified function, or either SIG_IGN or SIG_DFL. Upon arrival of a signal with number signum the following happens. If the corresponding handler is set to SIG_IGN, then the signal is ignored. If the handler is set to SIG_DFL, then the default action associated to the signal (see signal(7)) occurs. Finally, if the han- dler is set to a function sighandler then first either the handler is reset to SIG_DFL or an implementation-dependent blocking of the sig- nal is performed and next sighandler is called with argument signum. Using a signal handler function for a signal is called "catching the signal". The signals SIGKILL and SIGSTOP cannot be caught or ignored. RETURN VALUE
The signal() function returns the previous value of the signal handler, or SIG_ERR on error. PORTABILITY
The original Unix signal() would reset the handler to SIG_DFL, and System V (and the Linux kernel and libc4,5) does the same. On the other hand, BSD does not reset the handler, but blocks new instances of this signal from occurring during a call of the handler. The glibc2 library follows the BSD behaviour. If one on a libc5 system includes <bsd/signal.h> instead of <signal.h> then signal is redefined as __bsd_signal and signal has the BSD semantics. This is not recommended. If one on a glibc2 system defines a feature test macro such as _XOPEN_SOURCE or uses a separate sysv_signal function, one obtains classical behaviour. This is not recommended. Trying to change the semantics of this call using defines and includes is not a good idea. It is better to avoid signal altogether, and use sigaction(2) instead. NOTES
According to POSIX, the behaviour of a process is undefined after it ignores a SIGFPE, SIGILL, or SIGSEGV signal that was not generated by the kill(2) or the raise(3) functions. Integer division by zero has undefined result. On some architectures it will generate a SIGFPE signal. (Also dividing the most negative integer by -1 may generate SIGFPE.) Ignoring this signal might lead to an endless loop. According to POSIX (3.3.1.3) it is unspecified what happens when SIGCHLD is set to SIG_IGN. Here the BSD and SYSV behaviours differ, caus- ing BSD software that sets the action for SIGCHLD to SIG_IGN to fail on Linux. The use of sighandler_t is a GNU extension. Various versions of libc predefine this type; libc4 and libc5 define SignalHandler, glibc defines sig_t and, when _GNU_SOURCE is defined, also sighandler_t. CONFORMING TO
ANSI C SEE ALSO
kill(1), kill(2), killpg(2), pause(2), raise(3), sigaction(2), signal(7), sigsetops(3), sigvec(2), alarm(2) Linux 2.2 2000-04-28 SIGNAL(2)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:56 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy