Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Memory leaks on compilations
Homework and Emergencies Emergency UNIX and Linux Support Memory leaks on compilations Post 302459711 by remi75 on Tuesday 5th of October 2010 08:47:58 AM
Old 10-05-2010
from gnu.org here are the "official" releases
July 31, 2010GCC 4.5.1 has been released.May 22, 2010GCC 4.3.5 has been released.April 29, 2010GCC 4.4.4 has been released.April 14, 2010GCC 4.5.0 has been released.Sid an unstable almost as an experimental ...
does your repository includes one of these versions ?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

memory leaks

Hi!! Experts, Any ideas how to check for the memory leaks in a process during performance testing?? I dont use purify.. Any way of finding it out using default S/W in HP UX-11 Can U gimme pointers to site having good scripts/tutorials on performance testing?? Thanx in Advance.. :) (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: jyotipg
3 Replies

2. HP-UX

Memory leaks on HP-UX 11i

Hi folks, We are using following listed configurations for a particular application. HP-UX 11i Sun Java 2 SDK Standard Edition 1.4.1 (version shipped with WebLogic 8) Oracle 9i Release 2 (Oracle 9.2.0) BEA WebLogic Server 8.1 SP3 It seems a memory leak when we use above configurations.... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: gimhan90
1 Replies

3. Programming

Tool for finding memory leaks

hi, i am a c++ programmer working on linux(redhat linux8.0) environment, i need to find out the memory leaks, so far i didn't used any tools, so what are the tools are available, and whic one is good to use. plz provide with a small example. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sarwan
1 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

strange problem with memory leaks

Hi Unix lovers, I am facing a strange problem about memory leak. One component of our product show memory leak at customer's end but not in development environment. The memory used by the exe goes on increasing at customer end but not in dev. customer has same m/c(HP unix 11i) , the same... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: shriashishpatil
1 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Find memory leaks shell script ???

Hi all, Has anyone out there a shell script to detect memory leaks on unix machines? And if so what way did they go about it .? (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: nano2
5 Replies

6. UNIX and Linux Applications

Looking for memory leaks freeware tools

Hello all Is there good free ware tools to check software memory leaks ? Some thing like purify on unix platforms sun/hp/linux Thanks (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: umen
3 Replies

7. Solaris

How to find Total and Free Physical Memory and Logical Memory in SOLARIS 9

Hi, Im working on Solaris 9 on SPARC-32 bit running on an Ultra-80, and I have to find out the following:- 1. Total Physical Memory in the system(total RAM). 2. Available Physical Memory(i.e. RAM Usage) 3. Total (Logical) Memory in the system 4. Available (Logical) Memory. I know... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: 0ktalmagik
4 Replies

8. AIX

valgrind - pthread memory leaks on AIX

Hi all, I have written a small code just to invoke main and return immediately. When built with libpthread on AIX box, valgrind throws lots of memory leak errors. But when built without libpthread, no issues at all. Here is the sample run for your look. Any idea where I might be going wrong?... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: visionofarun
3 Replies

9. Solaris

[DOUBT] Memory high in idle process on Solaris 10 (Memory Utilization > 90%)

Hi Experts, Our servers running Solaris 10 with SAP Application. The memory utilization always >90%, but the process on SAP is too less even nothing. Why memory utilization on solaris always looks high? I have statement about memory on solaris, is this true: Memory in solaris is used for... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: edydsuranta
4 Replies

10. Programming

Memory Leaks

Suppose I have a main() function with only one malloc statement allocating say some 1 gb memory. Also say my system has 1 gb of ram. main() { malloc(1gb) return(0) } The program above exits without freeing the memory. In this case will the 1 gb of heap memory be returned... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: rupeshkp728
9 Replies
ERROR::SDT(7stap)														 ERROR::SDT(7stap)

NAME
error::sdt - <sys/sdt.h> marker failures DESCRIPTION
Systemtap's <sys/sdt.h> probes are modeled after the dtrace USDT API, but are implemented differently. They leave a only a NOP instruction in the userspace program's text segment, and add an ELF note to the binary with metadata. This metadata describes the marker's name and parameters. This encoding is designed to be parseable by multiple tools (not just systemtap: GDB, the GNU Debugger, also contains sup- port). These allow the tools to find parameters and their types, wherever they happen to reside, even without DWARF debuginfo. The reason finding parameters is tricky is because the STAP_PROBE / DTRACE_PROBE markers store an assembly language expression for each op- erand, as a result of use of gcc inline-assembly directives. The compiler is given a broad gcc operand constraint string ("nor") for the operands, which usually works well. Usually, it does not force the compiler to load the parameters into or out of registers, which would slow down an instrumented program. However, some instrumentation sites with some parameters do not work well with the default "nor" con- straint. unresolveable at run-time GCC may emit strings that an assembler could resolve (from the context of compiling the original program), but a run-time tool can- not. For example, the operand string might refer to a label of a local symbol that is not emitted into the ELF object file at all, which leaves no trace for the run-time. Reference to such parameters from within systemtap can result in "SDT asm not understood" errors. too complicated expression GCC might synthesize very complicated assembly addressing modes from complex C data types / pointer expressions. systemtap or gdb may not be able to parse some valid but complicated expressions. Reference to such parameters from within systemtap can result in "SDT asm not understood" errors. overly restrictive constraint GCC might not be able to even compile the original program with the default "nor" constraint due to shortage of registers or other reasons. A compile-time gcc error such as "asm operand has impossible constraints" may result. There are two general workarounds to this family of problems. change the constraints While compiling the original instrumented program, set the STAP_SDT_ARG_CONSTRAINT macro to different constraint strings. See the GCC manual about various options. For example, on many machine architectures, "r" forces operands into registers, and "g" leaves operands essentially unconstrained. revert to debuginfo As long as the instrumented program compiles, it may be fine simply to keep using <sys/sdt.h> but eschew extraction of a few indi- vidual parameters. In the worst case, disable <sys/sdt.h> macros entirely to eschew the compiled-in instrumentation. If DWARF debuginfo was generated and preserved, a systemtap script could refer to the underlying source context variables instead of the positional STAP_PROBE parameters. SEE ALSO
stap(1), stapprobes(3stap), error::dwarf(7stap), http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Constraints.html, http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/UserSpaceProbeImplementation, error::reporting(7stap) ERROR::SDT(7stap)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy