Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming realloc fails in C : what next ? Post 302457564 by jossojjos on Tuesday 28th of September 2010 09:39:40 AM
Old 09-28-2010
Thanks for pointing that out, kermit !
I'll keep that in mind for the next time I analyze large datasets.

jos
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Realloc

Can Any body give me a exampla which has the usage of realloc i want a function which uses realloc & increases /decreases the size of a pointer (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: wojtyla
0 Replies

2. Programming

Does realloc free fairly?

Hello, my program works properly but valgrind tells me I am not freeing allocated memory. I think the problem is in realloc. I am pretty sure I do something wrong with realloc, because I changed it a bit and valgrind noticed less errors (that the program wasn't working properly with less errors... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: samciz
3 Replies

3. Programming

help with realloc() on Linux

hi, I'm using gcc version 3.4.6 on a Red Hat system... (not sure how to determine version of glibc) when i run the following, i get: glibc detected *** realloc(): invalid next size: 0x0804a170 I'm not sure what is wrong. The error happens on the second iteration of the while loop.... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Andrewkl
3 Replies

4. Programming

tolower (static pointer + malloc + realloc)

N00B here. This function would be easier using a char pointer along with free. But I wish to learn how to use char static pointers (they do not require free, right ?). How do I erase the content of a static pointer ? Terminating the string works but the static pointer's content is not being... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: limmer
4 Replies

5. Programming

malloc vs realloc

Why when using realloc, john is reversed 3 times but not the other 2 names ? But if I use malloc, then the 3 names are reversed correctly ? (but then there is a memory leak) How can I reverse all 3 names without a memory leak ? char *BUFFER = NULL; char *STRREVERSE(const char *STRING) {... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: cyler
5 Replies

6. Programming

What happens when realloc() fails?

Hi, I am seeing varying results about, when realloc() fails in reallocation. Which one is correct out of the below? a) realloc() maintains the original pointer (i.e) the original pointer is left unaltered/untouched but relloc() returns the NULL value. b) original buffer pointer is lost... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: royalibrahim
3 Replies

7. Programming

Realloc() question

b = realloc(a, 1000); if realloc succeeds and b!=a (not in-place replacement), does realloc automatically free a or I should free both a and b afterwards? thank you! (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: bashuser2
5 Replies

8. Programming

realloc() fails

Not sure in which forum to post this. I'm trying here, in Programming. I'm working on a PC with Intel Duo processor & 2GB of ram. OS is Ubuntu 10.04. I'm having problems with a C++ program that makes extensive use of realloc(). It happens that as soon as the overall memory allocated(OS +... (14 Replies)
Discussion started by: mamboknave
14 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

about realloc routing

#include <malloc.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> int* allocat_array(void) { int *array; int tmp; int n_values = 0 ; array = malloc(sizeof(int)); if(array == NULL) return NULL; while(scanf("%d",&tmp) != EOF) { ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vincent__tse
1 Replies

10. Programming

problem with realloc( i think is gcc :/ )

Hi everyone, i made this program. is a simple one for practising malloc, realloc and structs. I have a struct named shop as global variable in which i take the size of the matrix from the keyboard and after i malloc it. I insert the values with the fullarray() and after i print the matrix with... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: giampoul
7 Replies
MALLOC(3)						     Linux Programmer's Manual							 MALLOC(3)

NAME
calloc, malloc, free, realloc - Allocate and free dynamic memory SYNOPSIS
#include <stdlib.h> void *calloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size); void *malloc(size_t size); void free(void *ptr); void *realloc(void *ptr, size_t size); DESCRIPTION
calloc() allocates memory for an array of nmemb elements of size bytes each and returns a pointer to the allocated memory. The memory is set to zero. malloc() allocates size bytes and returns a pointer to the allocated memory. The memory is not cleared. free() frees the memory space pointed to by ptr, which must have been returned by a previous call to malloc(), calloc() or realloc(). Oth- erwise, or if free(ptr) has already been called before, undefined behaviour occurs. If ptr is NULL, no operation is performed. realloc() changes the size of the memory block pointed to by ptr to size bytes. The contents will be unchanged to the minimum of the old and new sizes; newly allocated memory will be uninitialized. If ptr is NULL, the call is equivalent to malloc(size); if size is equal to zero, the call is equivalent to free(ptr). Unless ptr is NULL, it must have been returned by an earlier call to malloc(), calloc() or realloc(). RETURN VALUE
For calloc() and malloc(), the value returned is a pointer to the allocated memory, which is suitably aligned for any kind of variable, or NULL if the request fails. free() returns no value. realloc() returns a pointer to the newly allocated memory, which is suitably aligned for any kind of variable and may be different from ptr, or NULL if the request fails. If size was equal to 0, either NULL or a pointer suitable to be passed to free() is returned. If real- loc() fails the original block is left untouched - it is not freed or moved. CONFORMING TO
ANSI-C SEE ALSO
brk(2), posix_memalign(3) NOTES
The Unix98 standard requires malloc(), calloc(), and realloc() to set errno to ENOMEM upon failure. Glibc assumes that this is done (and the glibc versions of these routines do this); if you use a private malloc implementation that does not set errno, then certain library routines may fail without having a reason in errno. Crashes in malloc(), free() or realloc() are almost always related to heap corruption, such as overflowing an allocated chunk or freeing the same pointer twice. Recent versions of Linux libc (later than 5.4.23) and GNU libc (2.x) include a malloc implementation which is tunable via environment vari- ables. When MALLOC_CHECK_ is set, a special (less efficient) implementation is used which is designed to be tolerant against simple errors, such as double calls of free() with the same argument, or overruns of a single byte (off-by-one bugs). Not all such errors can be protected against, however, and memory leaks can result. If MALLOC_CHECK_ is set to 0, any detected heap corruption is silently ignored; if set to 1, a diagnostic is printed on stderr; if set to 2, abort() is called immediately. This can be useful because otherwise a crash may happen much later, and the true cause for the problem is then very hard to track down. Linux follows an optimistic memory allocation strategy. This means that when malloc() returns non-NULL there is no guarantee that the mem- ory really is available. In case it turns out that the system is out of memory, one or more processes will be killed by the infamous OOM killer. GNU
1993-04-04 MALLOC(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy