Sponsored Content
Special Forums UNIX and Linux Applications High Performance Computing Memory Barriers for (Ubuntu) Linux (i686) Post 302430462 by Corona688 on Thursday 17th of June 2010 05:25:35 PM
Old 06-17-2010
P.S. On a two-core single-CPU system, the overhead of XCHG vs LOCK XCHG with five seperate processes:

Code:
$ ./a.out & ./a.out & ./a.out & ./a.out & ./a.out &
12225 !Lock     time = 0 M 8 S 657 ms 205 us = 0.116 Mops/s
12229 !Lock     time = 0 M 8 S 801 ms 676 us = 0.114 Mops/s
12227 !Lock     time = 0 M 8 S 896 ms 459 us = 0.112 Mops/s
12228 !Lock     time = 0 M 8 S 958 ms 739 us = 0.112 Mops/s
12226 !Lock     time = 0 M 9 S 157 ms 723 us = 0.109 Mops/s
12228 Lock      time = 0 M 8 S 610 ms 749 us = 0.116 Mops/s
12227 Lock      time = 0 M 8 S 719 ms 860 us = 0.115 Mops/s
12225 Lock      time = 0 M 9 S 49 ms 622 us = 0.111 Mops/s
12226 Lock      time = 0 M 8 S 608 ms 304 us = 0.116 Mops/s
12229 Lock      time = 0 M 9 S 48 ms 352 us = 0.111 Mops/s

The code is a million loops of this:
Code:
                        "LOOP1:                 \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       loop    LOOP1   \n"

except once with LOCK XCHG, one with just XCHG. No significant difference.

---------- Post updated at 03:25 PM ---------- Previous update was at 03:14 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by gorga
I originally used it with existing thread-pools, but found I needed more control over the allocation of "tasks" to "cores"
How so?
Quote:
hence I'm making my own.
I don't see how using a different structure excludes pthreads. You wanted to avoid pthreads since it used atomic ops, and are prepared to use atomic ops instead? It's best to write portably if possible anyway.

Last edited by Corona688; 06-17-2010 at 06:42 PM..
 

4 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Memory-waste in Ubuntu/Debian?

I have 512 mem on this laptop, though 'top' tells me I only have 380. However, Ubuntu is using 288 mb of memory, when I only have 3 terminals, running lynx, vim(for this file) and (of course) top. Considering it I have lynx running a 600 page txt file, which of course would eat some memory but 300?... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: riwa
0 Replies

2. Linux

i686, x86 64, ppc

Hi, i am quite new to linux. I am interested in fedora linux distro. Fedora Project I dont know which one to choose, either i686, x86 64 or ppc. I prefer a live cd, coz its easy to use. And what is the difference between "Fedora Desktop Live Media" and "Fedora KDE Live Media". (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: superblacksmith
3 Replies

3. Programming

Getting the total virtual memory for ubuntu in c++

Hi guys , i need to get the total virtual memory in ubuntu but i need to write a C++ code for that, any idea on how to go about doing it? any references? or website that i can refer to ? (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: xiaojesus
6 Replies

4. Ubuntu

XP and Linux (Ubuntu) on same disk, Can I install Ubuntu on not-yet partitioned portion of disk?

My PC (Esprimo, 3 yeas old) has one hard drive having 2 partitions C: (80 GB NTFS, XP) and D: (120 GB NTFS, empty) and and a 200 MB area that yet is not-partitioned. I would like to try Ubuntu and to install Ubuntu on the not-partitioned area . The idea is to have the possibility to run... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: C.Weidemann
7 Replies
Lock(3pm)						User Contributed Perl Documentation						 Lock(3pm)

NAME
DB_File::Lock - Locking with flock wrapper for DB_File SYNOPSIS
use DB_File::Lock; use Fcntl qw(:flock O_RDWR O_CREAT); $locking = "read"; $locking = "write"; $locking = { mode => "read", nonblocking => 0, lockfile_name => "/path/to/shared.lock", lockfile_mode => 0600, }; [$X =] tie %hash, 'DB_File::Lock', $filename, $flags, $mode, $DB_HASH, $locking; [$X =] tie %hash, 'DB_File::Lock', $filename, $flags, $mode, $DB_BTREE, $locking; [$X =] tie @array, 'DB_File::Lock', $filename, $flags, $mode, $DB_RECNO, $locking; # or place the DB_File arguments inside a list reference: [$X =] tie %hash, 'DB_File::Lock', [$filename, $flags, $mode, $DB_HASH], $locking; ...use the same way as DB_File for the rest of the interface... DESCRIPTION
This module provides a wrapper for the DB_File module, adding locking. When you need locking, simply use this module in place of DB_File and add an extra argument onto the tie command specifying if the file should be locked for reading or writing. The alternative is to write code like: open(LOCK, "<$db_filename.lock") or die; flock(LOCK, LOCK_SH) or die; tie(%db_hash, 'DB_File', $db_filename, O_RDONLY, 0600, $DB_HASH) or die; ... then read the database ... untie(%db_hash); close(LOCK); This module lets you write tie(%db_hash, 'DB_File::Lock', $db_filename, O_RDONLY, 0600, $DB_HASH, 'read') or die; ... then read the database ... untie(%db_hash); This is better for two reasons:(1) Less cumbersome to write.(2) A fatal exception in the code working on the database which does not lead to process termination will probably not close the lockfile and therefore cause a dropped lock. USAGE DETAILS
Tie to the database file by adding an additional locking argument to the list of arguments to be passed through to DB_File, such as: tie(%db_hash, 'DB_File::Lock', $db_filename, O_RDONLY, 0600, $DB_HASH, 'read'); or enclose the arguments for DB_File in a list reference: tie(%db_hash, 'DB_File::Lock', [$db_filename, O_RDONLY, 0600, $DB_HASH], 'read'); The filename used for the lockfile defaults to "$filename.lock" (the filename of the DB_File with ".lock" appended). Using a lockfile separate from the database file is recommended because it prevents weird interactions with the underlying database file library The additional locking argument added to the tie call can be:(1) "read" -- acquires a shared lock for reading(2) "write" -- acquires an exclusive lock for writing(3) A hash with the following keys (all optional except for the "mode"): mode the locking mode, "read" or "write". lockfile_name specifies the name of the lockfile to use. Default is "$filename.lock". This is useful for locking multiple resources with the same lockfiles. nonblocking determines if the flock call on the lockfile should block waiting for a lock, or if it should return failure if a lock can not be immediately attained. If "nonblocking" is set and a lock can not be attained, the tie command will fail. Currently, I'm not sure how to differentiate this between a failure form the DB_File layer. lockfile_mode determines the mode for the sysopen call in opening the lockfile. The default mode will be formulated to allow anyone that can read or write the DB_File permission to read and write the lockfile. (This is because some systems may require that one have write access to a file to lock it for reading, I understand.) The umask will be prevented from applying to this mode. Note: One may import the same values from DB_File::Lock as one may import from DB_File. GOOD LOCKING ETIQUETTE
To avoid locking problems, realize that it is critical that you release the lock as soon as possible. See the lock as a "hot potato", something that you must work with and get rid of as quickly as possible. See the sections of code where you have a lock as "critical" sections. Make sure that you call "untie" as soon as possible. It is often better to write: # open database file with lock # work with database # lots of processing not related to database # work with database # close database and release lock as: # open database file with lock # work with database # close database and release lock # lots of processing not related to database # open database file with lock # work with database # close database and release lock Also realize that when acquiring two locks at the same time, a deadlock situation can be caused. You can enter a deadlock situation if two processes simultaneously try to acquire locks on two separate databases. Each has locked only one of the databases, and cannot continue without locking the second. Yet this will never be freed because it is locked by the other process. If your processes all ask for their DB files in the same order, this situation cannot occur. OTHER LOCKING MODULES
There are three locking wrappers for DB_File in CPAN right now. Each one implements locking differently and has different goals in mind. It is therefore worth knowing the difference, so that you can pick the right one for your application. Here are the three locking wrappers: Tie::DB_Lock -- DB_File wrapper which creates copies of the database file for read access, so that you have kind of a multiversioning concurrent read system. However, updates are still serial. Use for databases where reads may be lengthy and consistency problems may occur. Tie::DB_LockFile -- DB_File wrapper that has the ability to lock and unlock the database while it is being used. Avoids the tie-before- flock problem by simply re-tie-ing the database when you get or drop a lock. Because of the flexibility in dropping and re-acquiring the lock in the middle of a session, this can be massaged into a system that will work with long updates and/or reads if the application follows the hints in the POD documentation. DB_File::Lock (this module) -- extremely lightweight DB_File wrapper that simply flocks a lockfile before tie-ing the database and drops the lock after the untie. Allows one to use the same lockfile for multiple databases to avoid deadlock problems, if desired. Use for databases where updates are reads are quick and simple flock locking semantics are enough. (This text duplicated in the POD documentation, by the way.) AUTHOR
David Harris <dharris@drh.net> Helpful insight from Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> SEE ALSO
DB_File(3). perl v5.10.0 2009-07-23 Lock(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy