Sponsored Content
Special Forums UNIX and Linux Applications High Performance Computing Memory Barriers for (Ubuntu) Linux (i686) Post 302430462 by Corona688 on Thursday 17th of June 2010 05:25:35 PM
Old 06-17-2010
P.S. On a two-core single-CPU system, the overhead of XCHG vs LOCK XCHG with five seperate processes:

Code:
$ ./a.out & ./a.out & ./a.out & ./a.out & ./a.out &
12225 !Lock     time = 0 M 8 S 657 ms 205 us = 0.116 Mops/s
12229 !Lock     time = 0 M 8 S 801 ms 676 us = 0.114 Mops/s
12227 !Lock     time = 0 M 8 S 896 ms 459 us = 0.112 Mops/s
12228 !Lock     time = 0 M 8 S 958 ms 739 us = 0.112 Mops/s
12226 !Lock     time = 0 M 9 S 157 ms 723 us = 0.109 Mops/s
12228 Lock      time = 0 M 8 S 610 ms 749 us = 0.116 Mops/s
12227 Lock      time = 0 M 8 S 719 ms 860 us = 0.115 Mops/s
12225 Lock      time = 0 M 9 S 49 ms 622 us = 0.111 Mops/s
12226 Lock      time = 0 M 8 S 608 ms 304 us = 0.116 Mops/s
12229 Lock      time = 0 M 9 S 48 ms 352 us = 0.111 Mops/s

The code is a million loops of this:
Code:
                        "LOOP1:                 \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       loop    LOOP1   \n"

except once with LOCK XCHG, one with just XCHG. No significant difference.

---------- Post updated at 03:25 PM ---------- Previous update was at 03:14 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by gorga
I originally used it with existing thread-pools, but found I needed more control over the allocation of "tasks" to "cores"
How so?
Quote:
hence I'm making my own.
I don't see how using a different structure excludes pthreads. You wanted to avoid pthreads since it used atomic ops, and are prepared to use atomic ops instead? It's best to write portably if possible anyway.

Last edited by Corona688; 06-17-2010 at 06:42 PM..
 

4 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Memory-waste in Ubuntu/Debian?

I have 512 mem on this laptop, though 'top' tells me I only have 380. However, Ubuntu is using 288 mb of memory, when I only have 3 terminals, running lynx, vim(for this file) and (of course) top. Considering it I have lynx running a 600 page txt file, which of course would eat some memory but 300?... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: riwa
0 Replies

2. Linux

i686, x86 64, ppc

Hi, i am quite new to linux. I am interested in fedora linux distro. Fedora Project I dont know which one to choose, either i686, x86 64 or ppc. I prefer a live cd, coz its easy to use. And what is the difference between "Fedora Desktop Live Media" and "Fedora KDE Live Media". (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: superblacksmith
3 Replies

3. Programming

Getting the total virtual memory for ubuntu in c++

Hi guys , i need to get the total virtual memory in ubuntu but i need to write a C++ code for that, any idea on how to go about doing it? any references? or website that i can refer to ? (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: xiaojesus
6 Replies

4. Ubuntu

XP and Linux (Ubuntu) on same disk, Can I install Ubuntu on not-yet partitioned portion of disk?

My PC (Esprimo, 3 yeas old) has one hard drive having 2 partitions C: (80 GB NTFS, XP) and D: (120 GB NTFS, empty) and and a 200 MB area that yet is not-partitioned. I would like to try Ubuntu and to install Ubuntu on the not-partitioned area . The idea is to have the possibility to run... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: C.Weidemann
7 Replies
Session::Lock::Semaphore(3)				User Contributed Perl Documentation			       Session::Lock::Semaphore(3)

NAME
Apache::Session::Lock::Semaphore - Provides mutual exclusion through semaphores SYNOPSIS
use Apache::Session::Lock::Semaphore; my $locker = new Apache::Session::Lock::Semaphore; die "no semaphores" unless $locker; $locker->acquire_read_lock($ref); $locker->acquire_write_lock($ref); $locker->release_read_lock($ref); $locker->release_write_lock($ref); $locker->release_all_locks($ref); DESCRIPTION
Apache::Session::Lock::semaphore fulfills the locking interface of Apache::Session. Mutual exclusion is achieved through system semaphores and the IPC::Semaphore module. CONFIGURATION
The module must know how many semaphores to use, and what semaphore key to use. The number of semaphores has an impact on performance. More semaphores means less lock contention. You should use the maximum number of semaphores that your platform will allow. On stock NetBSD, OpenBSD, and Solaris systems, this is probably 16. On Linux 2.2, this is 32. This module tries to guess the number based on your operating system, but it is safer to configure it yourself. To set the number of semaphores, you need to pass an argument in the usual Apache::Session style. The name of the argument is NSems, and the value is an integer power of 2. For example: tie %s, 'Apache::Session::Blah', $id, {NSems => 16}; You may also need to configure the semaphore key that this package uses. By default, it uses key 31818. You can change this using the argument SemaphoreKey: tie %s, 'Apache::Session::Blah', $id, {NSems => 16, SemaphoreKey => 42}; PROBLEMS
There are a few problems that people frequently encounter when using this package. If you get an invalid argument message, that usually means that the system is unhappy with the number of semaphores that you requested. Try decreasing the number of semaphores. The semaphore blocks that this package creates are persistent until the system is rebooted, so if you request 8 semaphores one time and 16 semaphores the next, it won't work. Use the system commands ipcs and ipcrm to inspect and remove unwanted semphore blocks. Cygwin IPC on Cygwin requires running cygserver. Without it, program will exit with "Bad System call" message. It cannot be intercepted with eval. Read /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/cygserver.README for more information. Darwin/MacOS X Darwin and MacOS X may not have semaphores, see <http://sysnet.ucsd.edu/~bellardo/darwin/sysvsem.html> *BSD Error "No space left on device" means that maximum number of semaphores is reached. See http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/kernel-resources.html <http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/kernel-resources.html> for more information. AUTHOR
This module was written by Jeffrey William Baker <jwbaker@acm.org>. SEE ALSO
Apache::Session perl v5.12.1 2008-04-30 Session::Lock::Semaphore(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy