Sponsored Content
Special Forums UNIX and Linux Applications High Performance Computing Memory Barriers for (Ubuntu) Linux (i686) Post 302430462 by Corona688 on Thursday 17th of June 2010 05:25:35 PM
Old 06-17-2010
P.S. On a two-core single-CPU system, the overhead of XCHG vs LOCK XCHG with five seperate processes:

Code:
$ ./a.out & ./a.out & ./a.out & ./a.out & ./a.out &
12225 !Lock     time = 0 M 8 S 657 ms 205 us = 0.116 Mops/s
12229 !Lock     time = 0 M 8 S 801 ms 676 us = 0.114 Mops/s
12227 !Lock     time = 0 M 8 S 896 ms 459 us = 0.112 Mops/s
12228 !Lock     time = 0 M 8 S 958 ms 739 us = 0.112 Mops/s
12226 !Lock     time = 0 M 9 S 157 ms 723 us = 0.109 Mops/s
12228 Lock      time = 0 M 8 S 610 ms 749 us = 0.116 Mops/s
12227 Lock      time = 0 M 8 S 719 ms 860 us = 0.115 Mops/s
12225 Lock      time = 0 M 9 S 49 ms 622 us = 0.111 Mops/s
12226 Lock      time = 0 M 8 S 608 ms 304 us = 0.116 Mops/s
12229 Lock      time = 0 M 9 S 48 ms 352 us = 0.111 Mops/s

The code is a million loops of this:
Code:
                        "LOOP1:                 \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       xchg    %ebx, a \n"
                        "       loop    LOOP1   \n"

except once with LOCK XCHG, one with just XCHG. No significant difference.

---------- Post updated at 03:25 PM ---------- Previous update was at 03:14 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by gorga
I originally used it with existing thread-pools, but found I needed more control over the allocation of "tasks" to "cores"
How so?
Quote:
hence I'm making my own.
I don't see how using a different structure excludes pthreads. You wanted to avoid pthreads since it used atomic ops, and are prepared to use atomic ops instead? It's best to write portably if possible anyway.

Last edited by Corona688; 06-17-2010 at 06:42 PM..
 

4 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Memory-waste in Ubuntu/Debian?

I have 512 mem on this laptop, though 'top' tells me I only have 380. However, Ubuntu is using 288 mb of memory, when I only have 3 terminals, running lynx, vim(for this file) and (of course) top. Considering it I have lynx running a 600 page txt file, which of course would eat some memory but 300?... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: riwa
0 Replies

2. Linux

i686, x86 64, ppc

Hi, i am quite new to linux. I am interested in fedora linux distro. Fedora Project I dont know which one to choose, either i686, x86 64 or ppc. I prefer a live cd, coz its easy to use. And what is the difference between "Fedora Desktop Live Media" and "Fedora KDE Live Media". (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: superblacksmith
3 Replies

3. Programming

Getting the total virtual memory for ubuntu in c++

Hi guys , i need to get the total virtual memory in ubuntu but i need to write a C++ code for that, any idea on how to go about doing it? any references? or website that i can refer to ? (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: xiaojesus
6 Replies

4. Ubuntu

XP and Linux (Ubuntu) on same disk, Can I install Ubuntu on not-yet partitioned portion of disk?

My PC (Esprimo, 3 yeas old) has one hard drive having 2 partitions C: (80 GB NTFS, XP) and D: (120 GB NTFS, empty) and and a 200 MB area that yet is not-partitioned. I would like to try Ubuntu and to install Ubuntu on the not-partitioned area . The idea is to have the possibility to run... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: C.Weidemann
7 Replies
Apache::Session::Lock::File(3pm)			User Contributed Perl Documentation			  Apache::Session::Lock::File(3pm)

NAME
Apache::Session::Lock::File - Provides mutual exclusion using flock SYNOPSIS
use Apache::Session::Lock::File; my $locker = new Apache::Session::Lock::File; $locker->acquire_read_lock($ref); $locker->acquire_write_lock($ref); $locker->release_read_lock($ref); $locker->release_write_lock($ref); $locker->release_all_locks($ref); $locker->clean($dir, $age); DESCRIPTION
Apache::Session::Lock::File fulfills the locking interface of Apache::Session. Mutual exclusion is achieved through the use of temporary files and the "flock" function. CONFIGURATION
The module must know where to create its temporary files. You must pass an argument in the usual Apache::Session style. The name of the argument is LockDirectory and its value is the path where you want the lockfiles created. Example: tie %s, 'Apache::Session::Blah', $id, {LockDirectory => '/var/lock/sessions'} If you do not supply this argument, temporary files will be created in /tmp. NOTES
clean This module does not unlink temporary files, because it interferes with proper locking. This can cause problems on certain systems (Linux) whose file systems (ext2) do not perform well with lots of files in one directory. To prevent this you should use a script to clean out old files from your lock directory. The meaning of old is left as a policy decision for the implementor, but a method is provided for implementing that policy. You can use the "clean" method of this module to remove files unmodified in the last $age seconds. Example: my $l = new Apache::Session::Lock::File; $l->clean('/var/lock/sessions', 3600) #remove files older than 1 hour acquire_read_lock Will do nothing if write lock is in effect, only set readlock flag to true. release_read_lock Will do nothing if write lock is in effect, only set readlock flag to false. Win32 and Cygwin Windows cannot escalate lock, so all locks will be exclusive. release_read_lock not supported - it is not used by Apache::Session. When deleting files, they are not locked (Win32 only). AUTHOR
This module was written by Jeffrey William Baker <jwbaker@acm.org>. SEE ALSO
Apache::Session perl v5.10.1 2010-10-18 Apache::Session::Lock::File(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy