03-04-2010
incredible - he's dealing with an old EOL box. his support contract may not cover CE/FE work for EOL boxes. Such is the case with my contract.
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Solaris
Anyone tell me what the above means?
I suspect I have to replace the memory module but does anyone know what this error means or how it occurs? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: frustrated1
2 Replies
2. HP-UX
HI
I am getting core dump with "Memory re-allocation Failure" error can any one help me to get the possible reasons of getting this type of error, I am running the C++ code on HP-UX.
Please help me thanx in advance (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: gyanusoni
1 Replies
3. Linux
Hi all,
I am working on USB data monitoring on Fedora Core 9. Kernel 2.6.25 has a built-in module (the one that isn't loadable, but compiles and links statically with the kernel during compilation) to snoop USB data. It is in <kernel_source_code>/drivers/usb/mon/.
I need to know if I can... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: anitemp
0 Replies
4. Solaris
Hi,
Im working on Solaris 9 on SPARC-32 bit running on an Ultra-80, and I have to find out the following:-
1. Total Physical Memory in the system(total RAM).
2. Available Physical Memory(i.e. RAM Usage)
3. Total (Logical) Memory in the system
4. Available (Logical) Memory.
I know... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: 0ktalmagik
4 Replies
5. Solaris
Hi all,
I just add in new cpu/memory module into SFV480 and unable to see new module on slot B. I already try many way like only 1 new module and swap the both module and boot up but still unable to see it.
If I only install the module into slot B, then the server is unbootable at all.
I... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mailbox80
1 Replies
6. Programming
Hi,
I'm trying to learn how to manage memory when I have to deal with lots of data.
Basically I'm indexing a huge file (5GB, but it can be bigger), by creating tables that
holds offset <-> startOfSomeData information. Currently I'm mapping the whole file at
once (yep!) but of course the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: emitrax
1 Replies
7. Solaris
Is it possible to restrict physical memory in solaris zone with zone.max-locked-memory just like we can do with rcapd ? I do not want to used rcapd (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: fugitive
1 Replies
8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi Friends,
I need a help from you all.
In my machine which is on Solaris 9.
the command prtdiag -v shows the complete output but it doesn't show "Memory Module Groups status" status.
I have tried restarting the picl daemon, but still it doesn't work.
Memory Module Groups:... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: vivek.goel.piet
2 Replies
9. Red Hat
Hello friends
Today i have changed my passwd policy for strong password
Everything is working correctly but when i changed my password , it did not ask me my old password
my /etc/pam.d/system-auth file is (only passwdqc.so module line)
password required pam_passwdqc.so retry=3... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: rink
0 Replies
10. Solaris
Hi Experts,
Our servers running Solaris 10 with SAP Application. The memory utilization always >90%, but the process on SAP is too less even nothing.
Why memory utilization on solaris always looks high?
I have statement about memory on solaris, is this true:
Memory in solaris is used for... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: edydsuranta
4 Replies
LEARN ABOUT OPENDARWIN
ct_ctl_ack
ct_ctl_adopt(3CONTRACT) ct_ctl_adopt(3CONTRACT)
NAME
ct_ctl_adopt, ct_ctl_abandon, ct_ctl_newct, ct_ctl_ack, ct_ctl_qack - common contract control functions
SYNOPSIS
cc [ flag... ] file... -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -lcontract [ library... ]
#include <libcontract.h>
int ct_ctl_adopt(int fd);
int ct_ctl_abandon(int fd);
int ct_ctl_newct(int fd, uint64_t evid);
int ct_ctl_ack(int fd, uint64_t evid);
int ct_ctl_qack(int fd, uint64_t evid, int templatefd);
These functions operate on contract control file descriptors obtained from the contract(4) file system.
The ct_ctl_adopt() function adopts the contract referenced by the file descriptor fd. After a successful call to ct_ctl_adopt(), the con-
tract is owned by the calling process and any events in that contract's event queue are appended to the process's bundle of the appropriate
type.
The ct_ctl_abandon() function abandons the contract referenced by the file descriptor fd. After a successful call to ct_ctl_abandon() the
process no longer owns the contract, any events sent by that contract are automatically removed from the process's bundle, and any critical
events on the contract's event queue are automatically acknowledged. Depending on its type and terms, the contract will either be orphaned
or destroyed.
The ct_ctl_ack() function acknowledges the critical event specified byevid. If the event corresponds to an exit negotiation, ct_ctl_ack()
also indicates that the caller is prepared for the system to proceed with the referenced reconfiguration.
The ct_ctl_qack() function requests a new quantum of time for the negotiation specified by the event ID evid.
The ct_ctl_newct() function instructs the contract specified by the file descriptor fd that when the current exit negotiation completes,
another contract with the terms provided by the template specified by templatefd should be automatically written.
Upon successful completion, ct_ctl_adopt(), ct_ctl_abandon(), ct_ctl_newct(), ct_ctl_ack(), and ct_ctl_qack() return 0. Otherwise, they
return a non-zero error value.
The ct_ctl_adopt() function will fail if:
EBUSY The contract is in the owned state.
EINVAL The contract was not inherited by the caller's process contract or was created by a process in a different zone.
The ct_ctl_abandon(), ct_ctl_newct(), ct_ctl_ack(), and ct_ctl_qack() functions will fail if:
EBUSY The contract does not belong to the calling process.
The ct_ctl_newct() and ct_ctl_qack() functions will fail if:
ESRCH The event ID specified by evid does not correspond to an unacknowledged negotiation event.
The ct_ctl_newct() function will fail if:
EINVAL The file descriptor specified by fd was not a valid template file descriptor.
The ct_ctl_ack() function will fail if:
ESRCH The event ID specified by evid does not correspond to an unacknowledged critical event.
The ct_ctl_qack() function will fail if:
ERANGE The maximum amount of time has been requested.
See attributes(5) for descriptions of the following attributes:
+-----------------------------+-----------------------------+
| ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE |
+-----------------------------+-----------------------------+
|Interface Stability |Evolving |
+-----------------------------+-----------------------------+
|MT-Level |Safe |
+-----------------------------+-----------------------------+
libcontract(3LIB), contract(4), attributes(5), lfcompile(5)
22 Aug 2005 ct_ctl_adopt(3CONTRACT)