Sponsored Content
The Lounge What is on Your Mind? Unix and Linux Product Reviews Post 302376297 by Neo on Tuesday 1st of December 2009 06:22:39 AM
Old 12-01-2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corona688
I'm concerned about the turnover rate. How long is a review going to stay relevant?
I don't think this is a concern at all.

First, posts in our forums are dated. Most people know that subjective information changes over time and that a product or service that was great or bad at one time or another, can change at any time.

Because we have some many very intelligent, real hands-on users, our reviews and mini-reviews on products and services are more meaningful that reviews on other sites where people review just for the sake of reviews and driving traffic to their site.

This is especially true if the review is by a senior person here. I think many people value the opinions of "real" people who actually work on solutions.

In fact, my recent mini-review on Slicehost v. Linode has been our most popular post of recent. Here are one comment on this post from the net:

Quote:
paultomes says: great summary of Slicehost service and why they chose @slicehost over Linode. - 11 hours ago
Of course, that comment could have been from a Slicehost marketing person, you never know.

That is why the human mind is so important when processing information. We need reviews and we need credible sites reviewing. For example, Tripadvisor is so full of "reviews" from owners and managers of properties, that it is not credible. On the other hand, at least with Agoda, the person must actually book a room to review.

I agree that reviews can be irrelevant. That is up to the reader to have the intelligence to know about credibility and timeliness. Since we have so many great moderators, we have a chance and being credible and relevant, just like my mini-review on my customer service experience is relevant, at least a number of people already seem to think so.

Senior people here are relevant and credible, much more credible than fly-by-night posters who login and dump some marketing information. If you or any of our senior members have an experience with a technical product or service, I want to hear about it. I am sure others feel the same way!
 

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX and Linux Applications

Print Spooler product on UNIX?

HI all, I was looking for Print Spooler products for Unix. Basically our requirement is to be able to send jobs to the spool "holded", change printing properties, view a list of jobs to be printed (based on some criteria), send a job to be printed (release) and view the contents of a specific... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: bananero
1 Replies

2. What is on Your Mind?

Member Reviews of the Movie: Avatar

Please comment and vote only if you saw the movie. What did you think? (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
13 Replies

3. What is on Your Mind?

Member Reviews of the Movie: Sherlock Holmes

In our last review post, members reviewed Avatar. Now, let's discuss Sherlock Holmes. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
3 Replies

4. Hardware

Looking for plotter MFP reviews - need new plotter for UNIX/Windows apps

We currently have an HP DesignJet 750C+ plotter (for color plotting) and a Xerox 8825 (for B/W plotting and also scanning/copying) for our engineering drawings. They are getting old and will need replacing soon (maintenance visits are on the increase, and parts for the Xerox are getting hard to... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: markolinux
0 Replies

5. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Which Product to Choose?

Okay, I have an Asus A8NSLI board with an Athlon 64 and I dunno, maybe 8gig Ram and Windows has crashed for the last time so I've finally had enough and I'll make it a Unix machine. I have a new 1Tera drive and I'm all set to go. Which brand of Unix/Linux can you advise me to go for? The... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: abrogard
3 Replies

6. What is on Your Mind?

Amazon Censorship on Book Reviews

Dystopia.? Censorship? Bad AI? My audiobook review of Russian Roulette on Audible (an Amazon company) was the top rated "Most Helpful" review. The "Most Helpful" review rating was 65 of 76 as of yesterday, ranking it at the top of the reviews for this audiobook. Then today, Audible (an... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Neo
1 Replies
aepattr(5)							File Formats Manual							aepattr(5)

NAME
aepattr - aegis project attribute file DESCRIPTION
The project attribute file is used to store modifiable information about a project. CONTENTS
description = string; This field contains a description of the project. Large amounts of prose are not required; a single line is sufficient. developer_may_review = boolean; If this field is true, then a developer may review her own change. This is probably only a good idea for projects of less than 3 people. The idea is for as many people as possible to critically examine a change. Note that the develop_end_action field may not contradict the developer_may_review field. If developers may not review their own work, then their changes may not goto directly to the being integrated state (as this means much the same thing). developer_may_integrate = boolean; If this field is true, then a developer may integrate her own change. This is probably only a good idea for projects of less than 3 people. The idea is for as many people as possible to critically examine a change. reviewer_may_integrate = boolean; If this field is true, then a reviewer may integrate a change she reviewed. This is probably only a good idea for projects of less than 3 people. The idea is for as many people as possible to critically examine a change. developers_may_create_changes = boolean; This field is true if developers may created changes, in addition to administrators. This tends to be a very useful thing, since developers find most of the bugs. forced_develop_begin_notify_command = string; This command is used to notify a developer that a change requires developing; it is issued when a project administrator uses an aedb -User command to force development of a change by a specific user. All of the substitutions described in aesub(5) are avail- able. This field is optional. Executed as: the new developer. Current directory: the development directory of the change for the new developer. Exit status: ignored. develop_end_notify_command = string; This command is used to notify that a change is ready for review. It will probably use mail, or it could be an in-house bulletin board. This field is optional, if not present no notification will be given. This command could also be used to notify other management systems, such as progress and defect tracking. All of the substitutions described by aesub(5) are available. Executed as: the developer. Current directory: the development directory of the change. Exit status: ignored. develop_end_undo_notify_command = string; This command is used to notify that a change had been withdrawn from review for further development. It will probably use mail, or it could be an in-house bulletin board. This field is optional, if not present no notification will be given. This command could also be used to notify other management systems, such as progress and defect tracking. All of the substitutions described by aesub(5) are available. Executed as: the developer. Current directory: the development directory of the change. Exit status: ignored. review_begin_notify_command = string; This command is used to notify that a review has begun. It will probably use mail, or it could be an in-house bulletin board. This field is optional, if not present no notification will be given. This command could also be used to notify other management systems, such as progress and defect tracking. All of the substitutions described by aesub(5) are available. Executed as: the reviewer. Current directory: the development directory of the change. Exit status: ignored. review_begin_undo_notify_command = string; This command is used to notify that a review is no longer in progress, the reviewer has withdrawn. It will probably use mail, or it could be an in-house bulletin board. This field is optional, if not present no notification will be given. This command could also be used to notify other management systems, such as progress and defect tracking. All of the substitutions described by aesub(5) are available. Executed as: the reviewer. Current directory: the development directory of the change. Exit status: ignored. review_pass_notify_command = string; This command is used to notify that a review has passed. It will probably use mail, or it could be an in-house bulletin board. This field is optional, if not present no notification will be given. This command could also be used to notify other management systems, such as progress and defect tracking. All of the substitutions described by aesub(5) are available. Executed as: the reviewer. Current directory: the development directory of the change. Exit status: ignored. review_pass_undo_notify_command = string; This command is used to notify that a review has passed. It will probably use mail, or it could be an in-house bulletin board. This field is optional, if not present no notification will be given. This command could also be used to notify other management systems, such as progress and defect tracking. Defaults to the same action as the develop_end_notify_command field. All of the substitutions described by aesub(5) are available. Executed as: the reviewer. Current directory: the development directory of the change. Exit status: ignored. review_fail_notify_command = string; This command is used to notify that a review has failed. It will probably use mail, or it could be an in-house bulletin board. This field is optional, if not present no notification will be given. This command could also be used to notify other management systems, such as progress and defect tracking. All of the substitutions described by aesub(5) are available. Executed as: the reviewer. Current directory: the development directory of the change. Exit status: ignored. integrate_pass_notify_command = string; This command is used to notify that an integration has passed. It will probably use mail, or it could be an in-house bulletin board. This field is optional, if not present no notification will be given. This command could also be used to notify other management systems, such as progress and defect tracking. All of the substitutions described by aesub(5) are available. Some compilers bury absolute path names into object files and executables. The renaming of the integration directory to become the new baseline breaks these paths. This command is passed an environment variable called AEGIS_INTEGRATION_DIRECTORY so that the appropriate symlink may be placed, if desired. Executed as: the project owner. Current directory: the new project baseline. Exit status: ignored. integrate_fail_notify_command = string; This command is used to notify that an integration has failed. It will probably use mail, or it could be an in-house bulletin board. This field is optional, if not present no notification will be given. This command could also be used to notify other management systems, such as progress and defect tracking. All of the substitutions described by aesub(5) are available. Executed as: the integrator. Current directory: the development directory of the change. Exit status: ignored. default_development_directory = string; The pathname of where to place new development directories. The pathname must be absolute. This field is only consulted if the field of the same name in the user configuration file is not set. umask = integer; File permission mode mask. See umask(2) for more information. This value will always be OR'ed with 022, because aegis is para- noid. default_test_exemption = boolean; This field contains what to do when a change is created with no test exemption specified. default_test_regression_exemption = boolean; This field contains what to do when a change is created with no regression test exemption specified. minimum_change_number = integer; The minimum change number for aenc(1), if no change number is specified. This allows the low-numbered change numbers to be used for branches later in the project. reuse_change_numbers = boolean; This controls whether the automatically selected aenc(1) change numbers "fill in" any gaps. Defaults to true if not set. minimum_branch_number = integer; The minimum branch number for aenbr(1), if no branch number is specified. Defaults to 1 if not set. skip_unlucky = boolean; This field may be set to true if you want to skip various unlucky numbers for changes, branches and tests. Various traditions are avoided, both Eastern and Western. Defaults to false if not set. compress_database = boolean; This field may be set to true if you want to compress the database on writing. (It is always uncompressed on reading if neces- sary.) Defaults to false if not set. Unless you have an exceptionally large project, coupled with fast CPUs and high network latency, there is probably very little benefit in using this feature. (The database is usually less than 5% of the size of the repository.) On slow networks, however, this can improve the performance of file-related commands. develop_end_action = ( ...); This field controls the state the change enters after a successful aede(1) action. goto_being_reviewed This means that the change goes from the being_developed state to the being_reviewed state. The aerb(1) command only sends informative email. goto_awaiting_review This means that the change goes from the being_developed state to the awaiting_review state. The aerb(1) command is now mandatory. goto_awaiting_integration This means that the change goes from the being_developed state into the awaiting_integration state. Code review is skipped entirely. If the developer_may_review is false, it is not possible to use this setting. Note that the develop_end_action field may not contradict the developer_may_review field. If developers may not review their own work, then their changes may not goto directly to the being integrated state (as this means much the same thing). A contradictory setting will be replaced with goto_being_reviewed. protect_development_directory = boolean; This field may be used to protect the development directory after the being developed state. It does this by making it read-only at develop end time. Should the change ever be returned to the being developed state, it will be made writable again. The default is false, meaning to leave the development directory writable while is being reviewed and integrated. Aegis' normal tampering detection will notice if files are changed, but there is no reminder to the developer that the change should be left alone. This field defaults to false, because it can sometimes be slow. SEE ALSO
aepa(1) modify the attributes of a project aegis(5) aegis file format syntax aecattr(5) change attributes file format aecstate(5) change state file format, particularly as branches are used to remember most project state aepstate(5) project state file format COPYRIGHT
aegis version 4.24.3.D001 Copyright (C) 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 Peter Miller The aegis program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details use the 'aegis -VERSion License' command. This is free software and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; for details use the 'aegis -VERSion License' command. AUTHOR
Peter Miller E-Mail: millerp@canb.auug.org.au //* WWW: http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~millerp/ Reference Manual Aegis aepattr(5)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy