11-27-2009
Recovering OpenServer 5.0.6 onto different hardware
I'm sorting out the disaster recovery plan for a critical server. It's a Dell PowerEdge 2850 running Openserver 5.0.6a.
We have a disaster recovery agreement with HP and they have just confirmed that in the event of a total disaster such as the server being totally wiped out, they would NOT bring an identical server for me to recover onto, but a "HP equivalent".
I'd rather recover with root/boot and back-up tapes as it's so much quicker than reinstalling etc, but I'm unsure what is involved to do this when the hardware is different.
I wondered if it would be possible to configure BTLD drivers for the RAID controller, tape controller and NIC at boot time, but I can't find much information on this. It looks like commercial products like BackupEdge can do this though.
Has anyone done this or have any advice for doing it?
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I noticed this in a search for more security tools...
It IS possible to "undelete" a file; I suppose recover would be a better term for it. I suppose we've all made the boo-boo (that we all hopefully learned from) of deleting a file, and finding that you do not have a backup. I wouldn't... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: LivinFree
1 Replies
2. News, Links, Events and Announcements
Here is a very interesting article on not only hiding data on filesystems (the article deals mainly with the ext2 filesystem, which should also work with etx3), but also recovering, including from slack space on raw blocks, and even deleted data!
... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: LivinFree
0 Replies
3. SCO
I am helping a company recover a system that is SCO OS 5.0.5 - they have their backup media, cd copies of SCO, but they do not have their license keys to install and SCO is being difficult in validating their license.
Does anyone have an install license key for 5.0.5 that they would be willing... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ggraham
1 Replies
4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hello,
I was reading the manual on rm and it states that when you use 'rm' the files are usual recoverable, how is this done?
Does it assume that a backup system is in place?
Cheers
Jack (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: jack1981
4 Replies
5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hello,
By accident I erased a file at work and I need to restore it from a backup tape. My manager says I will have to use the mt command with the fsf option to look through the tape but I am confuzed. I did a restore -t to get a listing of the tape. This is taking a long time.
If I sound... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mojoman
1 Replies
6. SCO
I've been working with SCO Unix for several years now but have never had to restore a system from a bare drive.
I have a bootable CD that contains what appears to be the correct files necessary to recover the boot and root filesystems.
I've got the BIOS setup such that the CD is the first... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: teamhog
12 Replies
7. High Performance Computing
Hi all,
I'm writing an MPI application, in which I handle failures and recover them. In order to do that, in case of one node failure, I would like to remove that node from the MPI_COMM_WORLD group and continue with the remaining nodes.
Does anybody know how I can do that?
I'm using... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: SaTYR
5 Replies
8. AIX
Hi,My system is not booting and at the startup it is getting struck.In HMC error code is coming as 0000, I know the reason of failing.I have few queries on recovery, please answer:1. I have mksysb of the system from which I can restore the system but problem is my few application mount point was a... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: aixpank
5 Replies
9. Shell Programming and Scripting
I deleted one of the job from the cron tab. I want to get it back. How can i do this.
pplease suggest me..
thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: pranabrana
1 Replies
10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
I accidentally deleted a very important directory today with this rm -r. What would be the recommended way to recover my directory? After a lot of googleing I have seen these choices. Could I get some recommendations please?
Testdisk
Photorec- Doesn't recover file name like I would like. ... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: cokedude
10 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
bup-damage
bup-damage(1) General Commands Manual bup-damage(1)
NAME
bup-damage - randomly destroy blocks of a file
SYNOPSIS
bup damage [-n count] [-s maxsize] [--percent pct] [-S seed] [--equal]
DESCRIPTION
Use bup damage to deliberately destroy blocks in a .pack or .idx file (from .bup/objects/pack) to test the recovery features of bup-fsck(1)
or other programs.
THIS PROGRAM IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS AND WILL DESTROY YOUR DATA
bup damage is primarily useful for automated or manual tests of data recovery tools, to reassure yourself that the tools actually work.
OPTIONS
-n, --num=numblocks
the number of separate blocks to damage in each file (default 10). Note that it's possible for more than one damaged segment to
fall in the same bup-fsck(1) recovery block, so you might not damage as many recovery blocks as you expect. If this is a problem,
use --equal.
-s, --size=maxblocksize
the maximum size, in bytes, of each damaged block (default 1 unless --percent is specified). Note that because of the way bup-
fsck(1) works, a multi-byte block could fall on the boundary between two recovery blocks, and thus damaging two separate recovery
blocks. In small files, it's also possible for a damaged block to be larger than a recovery block. If these issues might be a
problem, you should use the default damage size of one byte.
--percent=maxblockpercent
the maximum size, in percent of the original file, of each damaged block. If both --size and --percent are given, the maximum block
size is the minimum of the two restrictions. You can use this to ensure that a given block will never damage more than one or two
git-fsck(1) recovery blocks.
-S, --seed=randomseed
seed the random number generator with the given value. If you use this option, your tests will be repeatable, since the damaged
block offsets, sizes, and contents will be the same every time. By default, the random numbers are different every time (so you can
run tests in a loop and repeatedly test with different damage each time).
--equal
instead of choosing random offsets for each damaged block, space the blocks equally throughout the file, starting at offset 0. If
you also choose a correct maximum block size, this can guarantee that any given damage block never damages more than one git-fsck(1)
recovery block. (This is also guaranteed if you use -s 1.)
EXAMPLE
# make a backup in case things go horribly wrong
cp -a ~/.bup/objects/pack ~/bup-packs.bak
# generate recovery blocks for all packs
bup fsck -g
# deliberately damage the packs
bup damage -n 10 -s 1 -S 0 ~/.bup/objects/pack/*.{pack,idx}
# recover from the damage
bup fsck -r
SEE ALSO
bup-fsck(1), par2(1)
BUP
Part of the bup(1) suite.
AUTHORS
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>.
Bup unknown- bup-damage(1)