09-24-2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by
otheus
I don't think the double posting rule should apply in forum where the member pays Bits for the post.
It would be nice, however, if the member updated their original post(s) and pointed to the other thread, as a courtesy.
What do you think?
5 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators
As i am going through the board today i noticed alot of questions out of place. and quite a few of them were rather redundent to stuff that has already been coverd. I know that talking about stuff that has already been coverd will always happen BUT comeone people. Dosent anyone read the FAQ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Optimus_P
1 Replies
2. What is on Your Mind?
Hi all,
found a little flash movie about posting. Check it out.
http://www.starterupsteve.com/swf/posting.html?
Regards,
Dream (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: DreamCatcher
2 Replies
3. Emergency UNIX and Linux Support
Emergency UNIX and Linux Support !! Help Me! Forum (Request Urgent Help)
README FIRST: How to Request Emergency or Urgent Help:
You may post emergency work-related questions in the emergency forum. To post in this forum you will need to use your Bits. All questions answered on a "best... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
0 Replies
4. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators
How do some posters get just a simple little text box in the middle of a sentence or paragragh?
I have seen many threads where posters aren't using code tags or quote tags, because both of those take up an entire line on the screen.
It looks like a code tag, but has no header and no newline... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: AlphaLexman
3 Replies
5. What is on Your Mind?
I think I've noticed over recent years that the number of threads started on the Emergency Support forum has become virtually nil. Why do we think that is?
Members cannot easily to find that forum?
The site layout has changed?
The longevity of this forum means that all the answers are... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: hicksd8
10 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
undocumented
UNDOCUMENTED(7) Linux Programmer's Manual UNDOCUMENTED(7)
NAME
undocumented - No manpage for this program, utility or function.
DESCRIPTION
This program, utility or function does not have a useful manpage. Before opening a bug to report this, please check with the Debian Bug
Tracking System (BTS) at <http://bugs.debian.org/> if a bug has already been reported. If not, you can submit a wishlist bug if you want.
If you are a competent and accurate writer and are willing to spend the time reading the source code and writing good manpages please write
a better man page than this one. Please contact the package maintainer and copy man-pages@qa.debian.org in order to avoid several people
working on the same manpage.
Even if you are not an accurate writer, your input may be helpful. Writing manual pages is quite easy, the format is described in man(7).
The most important and time-consuming task is to collect the information to be put in the new manpage.
DIAGNOSTICS
It is possible that the man page for the command you specified is installed and that your manual page index caches are out of sync. You
should try running mandb(8).
Try the following options if you want more information:
foo --help, foo -h, foo -?
info foo
whatis foo, apropos foo
dpkg --listfiles foo, dpkg --search foo
locate '*foo*'
find / -name '*foo*'
Additionally, check the directories /usr/share/doc/foo, /usr/lib/foo.
The documentation might be in a package starting with the same name as the package the software belongs to, but ending with -doc or -docs.
If you still didn't find the information you are looking for you might consider posting a call for help to debian-user@lists.debian.org.
SEE ALSO
info(1), whatis(1), apropos(1), dpkg(8), locate(1), find(1), updatedb(1), undocumented(3), man(7), mandb(8), missing(7).
Debian GNU/Linux August 24th, 2003 UNDOCUMENTED(7)