|
|
Sponsored Content
Operating Systems
Solaris
Route new network interface Solaris 8
Post 302355370 by sreiniche on Tuesday 22nd of September 2009 12:12:25 PM
09-22-2009
Route new network interface Solaris 8
Hi there,
I'm trying to configure an additional network interface on Solaris 8 (eri0). The interface has been activated, but all the frames are still routed to the current default interface (ce0) I've tried following command (with various syntaxes...) unsuccessfully so far:
# route add -net 192.168.4.0/24 -interface eri0
Could someone please help me ?
I've had a look into this forum and did not find answers that could match this case.
Thanks to forgive me if I've missed up something...
Below various outputs from (I believe) useful commands:
#ifconfig -a:
lo0: flags=1000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
ce0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 160.94.3.111 netmask fffffe00 broadcast 160.94.3.255
ether 0:3:ba
2a:db
eri0: flags=1000850<POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
inet 192.168.4.5 netmask ffffff00
ether 0:3:ba2a:db
#netstat -rn:
Routing Table: IPv4
Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
-------------------- -------------------- ----- ----- ------ ---------
140.94.2.0 140.94.3.111 U 1 12794 ce0
224.0.0.0 140.94.3.111 U 1 0 ce0
default 140.94.2.1 UG 1 20913
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 386828356 lo0
#route get 192.168.4.6:
route to: 192.168.4.6
destination: 192.168.4.6
mask: 255.255.255.255
interface: ce0
flags: <UP,DONE>
recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,ms rttvar,ms hopcount mtu expire
0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 0
TIA!
Stephane
I'm trying to configure an additional network interface on Solaris 8 (eri0). The interface has been activated, but all the frames are still routed to the current default interface (ce0) I've tried following command (with various syntaxes...) unsuccessfully so far:
# route add -net 192.168.4.0/24 -interface eri0
Could someone please help me ?
I've had a look into this forum and did not find answers that could match this case.
Thanks to forgive me if I've missed up something...
Below various outputs from (I believe) useful commands:
#ifconfig -a:
lo0: flags=1000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
ce0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 160.94.3.111 netmask fffffe00 broadcast 160.94.3.255
ether 0:3:ba
2a:dberi0: flags=1000850<POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
inet 192.168.4.5 netmask ffffff00
ether 0:3:ba
2a:db#netstat -rn:
Routing Table: IPv4
Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
-------------------- -------------------- ----- ----- ------ ---------
140.94.2.0 140.94.3.111 U 1 12794 ce0
224.0.0.0 140.94.3.111 U 1 0 ce0
default 140.94.2.1 UG 1 20913
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 386828356 lo0
#route get 192.168.4.6:
route to: 192.168.4.6
destination: 192.168.4.6
mask: 255.255.255.255
interface: ce0
flags: <UP,DONE>
recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,ms rttvar,ms hopcount mtu expire
0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 0
TIA!
Stephane
|
|
9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Solaris
Hi guys,
Hope somebody can help me on this. I have a Sun Sparc 20 workstation and it has a boot problem. During boot, an error message " ifconfig:socket: Bad File Number" come up and the workstation hang (cannot boot).
I did boot -s and checked using ifconfig -a command but i got the same... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: kroegand
0 Replies
2. Solaris
Hi All,
I recently installed Solaris 9 on my Compaq Presario V2000 Series (V2069CL) laptop. Everything is working fine except that Solaris is not able to detect the Network Interface after boot.
While the system is booting, it shows that it has detected "Xircom Pocket Ethernet parallel port... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: com2com
3 Replies
3. Solaris
Hi All,
yesterday I was trying to add a network route to my solaris 8 host using 'route add'. Everytime I tried, I kept getting the response 'network is unreachable'.
I was trying all kinds of different methods, however I eventually got it to work after bouncing the interface that I was... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: badoshi
2 Replies
4. Solaris
Please , I have a problem
I have add a statis route on Solaris 10, but after this, the network interface of Server was Offline.
The system is in cluster mode (3.2)
route add -net 10.10.1.128 -netmask 255.255.255.128 10.10.1.51
-------------------
lo0:... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Ruggero
1 Replies
5. Solaris
Hi,
/sbin/ifconfig -a
when i login as guest user , output like below,
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
eri0: flags=1004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: forumguest
5 Replies
6. Solaris
Hi,
Every time when i boot my system i have to manually issue the following commands.
ifconfig elxl0 plumb 192.168.200.129 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
route add default 192.168.200.1
I need some help so that it should be configured permanently and i wouldn't have to manually issue... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: malikshahid85
2 Replies
7. Solaris
Hi,
I have installed Solaris 10 on VMware7, When i used ifconfig -a to check network interface, it has shown lo0 as loopback interface.
Please advise how to configure network interfaces using VMware. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ajhal04
1 Replies
8. Solaris
Dear All,
I have a solaris Server in which I have 4 network interfaces , out of which only one is used . So all the applications are using this interface .
The interface speed is 1000Mbps . I find no hardware issue or packets g being dropped.
But i find that no of Input and Output... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: jegaraman
4 Replies
9. Solaris
Hi, I am new in Solaris 11. I can't even make the NIC work. Here is the issue:
Any help will be greatly appreciated. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: aixlover
6 Replies
LEARN ABOUT FREEBSD
ntb_hw
NTB(4) BSD Kernel Interfaces Manual NTB(4) NAME
ntb, ntb_hw, if_ntb -- Intel(R) Non-Transparent Bridge driver SYNOPSIS
To compile this driver into your kernel, place the following lines in your kernel configuration file: device ntb_hw device if_ntb Or, to load the driver as a module at boot, place the following line in loader.conf(5): if_ntb_load="YES" DESCRIPTION
The ntb driver provides support for the Non-Transparent Bridge (NTB) in the Intel S1200, Xeon E3 and Xeon E5 processor families. The NTB allows you to connect two computer systems using a PCI-e link if they have the correct equipment and connectors. CONFIGURATION
The NTB memory windows need to be configured by the BIOS. If your BIOS allows you to set their size, you should set the size of both memory windows to 1 MiB. This needs to be done on both systems. Each system needs to have a different IP address assigned. The MAC address is randomly generated. Also for maximum performance, the MTU should be set to 16 kiB. This can be done by adding the line below to rc.conf(5): ifconfig_ntb0="inet 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 16384" And on the second system : ifconfig_ntb0="inet 192.168.1.11 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 16384" If you are using the UDP protocol, you may want to increase the net.inet.udp.maxdgram sysctl(8) variable. SEE ALSO
rc.conf(5), sysctl(8) AUTHORS
The ntb driver was developed by Intel and originally written by Carl Delsey <carl@FreeBSD.org>. BUGS
If the driver is unloaded, it cannot be reloaded without a system reboot. The network support is limited. It isn't fully configurable yet. It also isn't integrated into netgraph(4) or bpf(4). NTB to Root Port mode is not yet supported. There is no way to protect your system from malicious behavior on the other system once the link is brought up. Anyone with root or kernel access on the other system can read or write to any location on your system. In other words, only connect two systems that completely trust each other. BSD
Apr 11, 2013 BSD