Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming Interesting issue with pthread_mutex_lock and siglongjmp in AIX 5.3 (and no other OS) Post 302325243 by fpmurphy on Saturday 13th of June 2009 11:07:37 PM
Old 06-14-2009
I would try increasing the thread stack size and see what happens. You may have a yellow or red (guard) zone stack overflow.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

pthread_rwlock_lock vs pthread_mutex_lock

I have been wondering what the difference between pthread_rwlock_lock and pthread_mutex_lock is. Both these routines acquire an exclusive rw lock on an enclosed region. So I performed a simple experiment in which I execute both these routines multiple times in a loop. Here are the results:... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kmehta
1 Replies

2. AIX

tcp_ephemeral_high issue with AIX 5.2

Hello, I have AIX5.2. I am trying to set tcp_ephemeral_high port value to 5000 and tcp_ephemeral_low value to 1024. tcp_ephemeral_high is not possible to set below 32769. pls advise how to set tcp_ephemeral_high value to 5000. (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: balareddy
7 Replies

3. AIX

Issue "Error 404" when upgrade AIX 5300-05-CSP-0000 to AIX (5300-09-02-0849)

Please read my issue! My old server using: - AIX system operating (5300-05-CSP-0000) - WebSphere 6.1.0.21 (Fix Pack 21) After I've upgraded version AIX - AIX system operating (5300-09-02-0849) - WebSphere 6.1.0.21 (Fix Pack 21) I have 1 issue when I access home page: "Error... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: gamonhon
0 Replies

4. AIX

Aix xlc interesting SEGV on exit

Hello all, One of the application we port to Aix from linux Segmentation faults when it exits. Here is part of backtrace of SEGV: (dbx) where splay(??, ??, ??) at free_y(??, ??) at free_common(??) at .... exit(??) at ... Application seem to perform everything expected well and... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: qrio.qrio
1 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Report filtering - Weird issue and interesting - UrgentPlease

Hi, Could any one help me to extract data from a report. I would like to get the two lines which are just below the separations I have a report like this -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pid Command Inuse Pin Pgsp Virtual... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ajilesh
2 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

HP UX and AIX compatibility issue

Hi All, The below code works perfectly on AIX machine but doesnt give the desired o/p on HP UX. Can someone please generalise the code so that it becomes platform independent. awk 'NR == FNR { /^*\47name/ && c++ # get the field number if (/^*\47size/) { split($0, t, ":") ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: subhrap.das
2 Replies

7. Programming

pthread_mutex_lock in ANSI C vs using Atomic builtins of GCC

I have a program which has 7-8 threads, and lots of shared variables; these variables (and also they may not the primitive type, they may be enum or struct ), then they may read/write by different threads at the same time. Now, my design is like this, typedef unsigned short int UINT16;... (14 Replies)
Discussion started by: sehang
14 Replies

8. AIX

AIX Networking Issue

Hello, I'm trying to set up an internet connection on an IBM RS/6000 7043-140 machine with AIX v 5.1. The problem is that no matter if it is setup to receive an IP address from another DHCP server or has a static IP set, it seems to act as a DHCP server that assigns a random IP address with a... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Xsystem
3 Replies

9. AIX

AIX memory issue

Currently server have load while there is no heavy things running, just oracle database/ application server oracle. I don't understand why server have heavy load, 22GB is under buffer, how to clean buffer/memory in AIX load averages: 9.42, 9.43, 9.68; 05:25:08 141 processes: 125 idle, 16... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: learnbash
12 Replies

10. War Stories

Interesting script issue clubbed with crontab.

Hello All, Finally I am posting an issue and it's solution which I faced last week. Let me explain it by headings. Issue's background: It was a nice Tuesday for me, went to office as usual started checking emails and work assigned to me. Suddenly a gentleman reached out to me on my desk(in a... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: RavinderSingh13
2 Replies
pthread_mutex_lock(3C)													    pthread_mutex_lock(3C)

NAME
pthread_mutex_lock, pthread_mutex_trylock, pthread_mutex_unlock - lock or unlock a mutex SYNOPSIS
cc -mt [ flag... ] file... -lpthread [ library... ] #include <pthread.h> int pthread_mutex_lock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex); int pthread_mutex_trylock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex); int pthread_mutex_unlock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex); The mutex object referenced by mutex is locked by calling pthread_mutex_lock(). If the mutex is already locked, the calling thread blocks until the mutex becomes available. This operation returns with the mutex object referenced by mutex in the locked state with the calling thread as its owner. If the mutex type is PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL, deadlock detection is not provided. Attempting to relock the mutex causes deadlock. If a thread attempts to unlock a mutex that it has not locked or a mutex that is unlocked, undefined behavior results. If the mutex type is PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK, then error checking is provided. If a thread attempts to relock a mutex that it has already locked, an error will be returned. If a thread attempts to unlock a mutex that it has not locked or a mutex which is unlocked, an error will be returned. If the mutex type is PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE, then the mutex maintains the concept of a lock count. When a thread successfully acquires a mutex for the first time, the lock count is set to 1. Every time a thread relocks this mutex, the lock count is incremented by one. Each time the thread unlocks the mutex, the lock count is decremented by one. When the lock count reaches 0, the mutex becomes available for other threads to acquire. If a thread attempts to unlock a mutex that it has not locked or a mutex that is unlocked, an error will be returned. If the mutex type is PTHREAD_MUTEX_DEFAULT, attempting to recursively lock the mutex results in undefined behavior. Attempting to unlock the mutex if it was not locked by the calling thread results in undefined behavior. Attempting to unlock the mutex if it is not locked results in undefined behavior. The pthread_mutex_trylock() function is identical to pthread_mutex_lock() except that if the mutex object referenced by mutex is currently locked (by any thread, including the current thread), the call returns immediately. The pthread_mutex_unlock() function releases the mutex object referenced by mutex. The manner in which a mutex is released is dependent upon the mutex's type attribute. If there are threads blocked on the mutex object referenced by mutex when pthread_mutex_unlock() is called, resulting in the mutex becoming available, the scheduling policy is used to determine which thread will acquire the mutex. (In the case of PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE mutexes, the mutex becomes available when the count reaches 0 and the calling thread no longer has any locks on this mutex.) If a signal is delivered to a thread waiting for a mutex, upon return from the signal handler the thread resumes waiting for the mutex as if it was not interrupted. If successful, the pthread_mutex_lock() and pthread_mutex_unlock() functions return 0. Otherwise, an error number is returned to indi- cate the error. The pthread_mutex_trylock() function returns 0 if a lock on the mutex object referenced by mutex is acquired. Otherwise, an error number is returned to indicate the error. The pthread_mutex_lock() and pthread_mutex_trylock() functions will fail if: EINVAL The mutex was created with the protocol attribute having the value PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT and the calling thread's priority is higher than the mutex's current priority ceiling. The pthread_mutex_trylock() function will fail if: EBUSY The mutex could not be acquired because it was already locked. The pthread_mutex_lock(), pthread_mutex_trylock() and pthread_mutex_unlock() functions may fail if: EINVAL The value specified by mutex does not refer to an initialized mutex object. EAGAIN The mutex could not be acquired because the maximum number of recursive locks for mutex has been exceeded. The pthread_mutex_lock() function may fail if: EDEADLK The current thread already owns the mutex. The pthread_mutex_unlock() function may fail if: EPERM The current thread does not own the mutex. When a thread makes a call to pthread_mutex_lock() or pthread_mutex_trylock(), if the symbol _POSIX_THREAD_PRIO_INHERIT is defined and the mutex is initialized with the protocol attribute having the value PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT and the robustness attribute having the value PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_NP (see pthread_mutexattr_getrobust_np(3C)), the pthread_mutex_lock() and pthread_mutex_trylock() functions will fail if: EOWNERDEAD The last owner of this mutex died while holding the mutex. This mutex is now owned by the caller. The caller must now attempt to make the state protected by the mutex consistent. If it is able to clean up the state, then it should call pthread_mutex_consistent_np() for the mutex and unlock the mutex. Subsequent calls to pthread_mutex_lock() and pthread_mutex_trylock() will behave normally, as before. If the caller is not able to clean up the state, pthread_mutex_consistent_np() should not be called for the mutex, but it should be unlocked. Subsequent calls to pthread_mutex_lock() and pthread_mutex_trylock() will fail to acquire the mutex with the error value ENOTRECOVER- ABLE. If the owner who acquired the lock with EOWNERDEAD dies, the next owner will acquire the lock with EOWN- ERDEAD. ENOTRECOVERABLE The mutex trying to be acquired is protecting the state that has been left irrecoverable by the mutex's last owner, who died while holding the lock. The mutex has not been acquired. This condition can occur when the lock was previ- ously acquired with EOWNERDEAD, and the owner was not able to clean up the state and unlocked the mutex without making the mutex consistent. ENOMEM The limit on the number of simultaneously held mutexes has been exceeded. See attributes(5) for descriptions of the following attributes: +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ | ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |Interface Stability |Standard | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |MT-Level |MT-Safe | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ pthread_mutex_init(3C), pthread_mutex_destroy(3C), pthread_mutex_consistent_np(3C), pthread_mutexattr_getrobust_np(3C), attributes(5), standards(5) In the current implementation of threads, pthread_mutex_lock(), pthread_mutex_unlock(), mutex_lock(), mutex_unlock(), pthread_mutex_try- lock(), and mutex_trylock() do not validate the mutex type. Therefore, an uninitialized mutex or a mutex with an invalid type does not return EINVAL. Interfaces for mutexes with an invalid type have unspecified behavior. Uninitialized mutexes that are allocated locally may contain junk data. Such mutexes need to be initialized using pthread_mutex_init() or mutex_init(). 23 Mar 2005 pthread_mutex_lock(3C)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy