Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Number of leap seconds
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Number of leap seconds Post 302323041 by jim mcnamara on Friday 5th of June 2009 07:59:22 AM
Old 06-05-2009
No. The standard for UNIX timekeeping does not include leap seconds.

NTP servers will report correct UTC values as leap seconds are inserted.
See:
NIST Time Scale Data Archive

Here is how I would do it - this assumes your system time is actually corrected by an ntp server.

1. calculate the Julian day for Jan 1, 1970 - call it day1

2. calculate the Julian day for today -- day2

There is code to do this on this forum - search for it. Julian days == number of days since Jan 1 4712 BCE

3. use the fact there are 86400 seconds in a day.
Code:
# this works at midnight 00:00:00 hh:mm:dd
time_t leapsec=time(NULL) - ( (day2 * 86400) - day1 * 86400) );

FYI as of this date - Jun 5 2009 - leapsec = 24

corrected by jmc

Last edited by jim mcnamara; 06-05-2009 at 04:34 PM.. Reason: I can't count.
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

how to get number of seconds

How do I get the number of seconds since 1970, within a script, for the previous day at 23:59? I need this value to pass into a sql statement to cleanup records older than the previous day at midnight. It will be automated via cron so no hard coding allowed. Thanks! (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: captainzeb
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Insertion of Leap Second

Hi All, We are running the HP-UX 11.11 and Linux AS 3.0. so, shall we need to make any changes for leap second i.e. insert the leap second on 1st Jan 2006 or does the system have some setup which would take care of this automatically. Please advise. Regards, Inder (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: isingh786
2 Replies

3. HP-UX

Leap Second

Hi All, We are running the HP-UX 11.11 and Linux AS 3.0. so, shall we need to make any changes for leap second i.e. insert the leap second on 1st Jan 2006 or does the system have some setup which would take care of this automatically. Please advise. Regards, Inder (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: isingh786
1 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

leap seconds and the stdc library

I understand the NTP protocol, so keeping system time updated is not a problem. Standard C library routines like localtime() take a number of UTC seconds elapsed since the start of the epoch (Jan 1, 1970). These times in seconds can be a filetime, system time, or some other time in the past or... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jim mcnamara
1 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Leap year K-shell script

I need a k-shell script that tests for leap-year. Does anyone have one at hand, need ASAP!!! (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: p1jls02
2 Replies

6. Fedora

Leap second happening

Have anybody heard about the Leap second problem Leap second :A leap second is a one-second adjustment that is occasionally applied to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) in order to keep its time of day close to the mean solar time. How could i avoid such thing in my script which i deal with... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: wnaguib
6 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Compare fraction number and convert duration to seconds

Hi friends, I have a file with contents below: 01.m4a 00:14:45.82, 01.mp4 00:03:46.05, -659.770000 05.m4a 00:27:43.51, 05.mp4 00:27:45.10, 1.590000 06.m4a 00:11:39.73, 06.mp4 00:11:44.60, 4.870000 If 5th column value more than 3 or less than -3 then I should get its name (from first... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: magnus29
2 Replies

8. Solaris

Leap second for year 2015

I hear the Leap second for 2015 will occur on June 30 at 23:59:60 according to the wild rumours from internet the expected impact ranges from crashing to hanging servers. Can anybody share their preparations what they have done for solaris servers? are there any patches to install or workaround?... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sparcguy
1 Replies
TIME2POSIX(3)						   BSD Library Functions Manual 					     TIME2POSIX(3)

NAME
time2posix, posix2time -- convert seconds since the Epoch LIBRARY
Standard C Library (libc, -lc) SYNOPSIS
#include <time.h> time_t time2posix(time_t t); time_t posix2time(time_t t); DESCRIPTION
IEEE Std 1003.1-1988 (``POSIX.1'') legislates that a time_t value of 536457599 shall correspond to "Wed Dec 31 23:59:59 GMT 1986." This effectively implies that POSIX time_t's cannot include leap seconds and, therefore, that the system time must be adjusted as each leap occurs. If the time package is configured with leap-second support enabled, however, no such adjustment is needed and time_t values continue to increase over leap events (as a true `seconds since...' value). This means that these values will differ from those required by POSIX by the net number of leap seconds inserted since the Epoch. Typically this is not a problem as the type time_t is intended to be (mostly) opaque--time_t values should only be obtained-from and passed- to functions such as time(3), localtime(3), mktime(3) and difftime(3). However, IEEE Std 1003.1-1988 (``POSIX.1'') gives an arithmetic expression for directly computing a time_t value from a given date/time, and the same relationship is assumed by some (usually older) appli- cations. Any programs creating/dissecting time_t's using such a relationship will typically not handle intervals over leap seconds cor- rectly. The time2posix() and posix2time() functions are provided to address this time_t mismatch by converting between local time_t values and their POSIX equivalents. This is done by accounting for the number of time-base changes that would have taken place on a POSIX system as leap sec- onds were inserted or deleted. These converted values can then be used in lieu of correcting the older applications, or when communicating with POSIX-compliant systems. The time2posix() function is single-valued. That is, every local time_t corresponds to a single POSIX time_t. The posix2time() function is less well-behaved: for a positive leap second hit the result is not unique, and for a negative leap second hit the corresponding POSIX time_t does not exist so an adjacent value is returned. Both of these are good indicators of the inferiority of the POSIX representation. The following table summarizes the relationship between time_t and its conversion to, and back from, the POSIX representation over the leap second inserted at the end of June, 1993. DATE TIME T X=time2posix(T) posix2time(X) 93/06/30 23:59:59 A+0 B+0 A+0 93/06/30 23:59:60 A+1 B+1 A+1 or A+2 93/07/01 00:00:00 A+2 B+1 A+1 or A+2 93/07/01 00:00:01 A+3 B+2 A+3 A leap second deletion would look like... DATE TIME T X=time2posix(T) posix2time(X) ??/06/30 23:59:58 A+0 B+0 A+0 ??/07/01 00:00:00 A+1 B+2 A+1 ??/07/01 00:00:01 A+2 B+3 A+2 [Note: posix2time(B+1) => A+0 or A+1] If leap-second support is not enabled, local time_t's and POSIX time_t's are equivalent, and both time2posix() and posix2time() degenerate to the identity function. SEE ALSO
difftime(3), localtime(3), mktime(3), time(3) BSD
September 11, 2005 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:56 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy