05-17-2009
I used to use F-Prot worked real good, if you want a GUI you can get QT-Fprot. I did scans weekly but after a year or so I gave up, as stated above theres really no need to have an AV in Linux, Yes there are Linux/Unix viruses, but someone running Win with a totally locked down system will have an infection issue LONG before you have one without.
6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Cybersecurity
:(
Is there anyone know the anti-spam and anti- virus package software list for Unix !!??
Where can I find that, I have no idea in searching through the internet! (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: wwayne
2 Replies
2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Can anyone recommend Anti Virus sw for a ten user small business environment running Unix... ver?
Thanks for the help (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: rpm
1 Replies
3. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi all.
Iam using AVG antivirus personel edition, and i can only set it to run at one time only. Iam running it on a Win98 machine. is it possilbe to write a Perl script or c++ script to set it up to run at 12pm and 3pm and 6pm ??? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: perleo
1 Replies
4. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions
I used to have trendmicro I used it for free when I worked with a previous company, when I left I had to uninstall it and switched to using Zone Alarm.
I tell you on some days I really want to pull my hair out when my PC really works like a snail and sometimes really so unresponsive for up to... (20 Replies)
Discussion started by: sparcguy
20 Replies
5. Linux
Can anyone tell the best free antivirus for Linux? I'm using RED HAT 9.0 & want to install antivirus for it.
So if anyone has any suggestions of where to get that antivirus, that would be great! (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: billcrosby
2 Replies
6. Linux
Greetings To All!
I am new in supporting Linux and recently I was tasked to find out the following information and am not sure how to find the answers, hence this posting... I am running Redhat Enterprise Server 5.4 I realize this is a Redhat specific question, but it pertains to all of our... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: Rob Sandifer
7 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
swiss::dts
SWISS::DTs(3pm) User Contributed Perl Documentation SWISS::DTs(3pm)
Name
SWISS::DTs
Description
SWISS::DTs represents the DT lines within an Swiss-Prot + TrEMBL entry as specified in the user manual
http://www.expasy.org/sprot/userman.html .
Inherits from
SWISS::BaseClass.pm
Attributes
"CREATED_date"
Creation date
"ANN_date"
Last annotation update
"SQ_date"
Last Sequence update
"CREATED_rel"
Created for release
"ANN_rel"
Last annotation for release
"SQ_rel"
Last sequence update for release
"ANN_version"
Version number for entry annotation
"SQ_version"
Version number for sequence
Methods
Standard methods
new
fromText
toText
sort
Writing methods
set_Created ($date, $release)
set_AnnotationUpdate ($date, $release[, $version])
set_SequenceUpdate ($date, $release[, $version])
TRANSITION
The format of the DT line will change in early 2004 from:
DT 01-JUL-1993 (Rel. 26, Created)
DT 01-JUL-1993 (Rel. 26, Last sequence update)
DT 28-FEB-2003 (Rel. 41, Last annotation update)
to:
DT 01-JUL-1993, integrated into UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot.
DT 01-JUL-1993, sequence version 36.
DT 28-FEB-2003, entry version 54.
This module supports both formats. To convert an entry from the old to the new format, do:
$entry->DTs->CREATED_rel("UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot");
$entry->DTs->ANN_version(54);
$entry->DTs->SQ_version(36);
perl v5.10.1 2008-07-11 SWISS::DTs(3pm)