Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: ZFS Question
Operating Systems Solaris ZFS Question Post 302315127 by seg on Monday 11th of May 2009 03:19:24 PM
Old 05-11-2009
Get started reading the ZFS docs at docs.sun.com. I cannot speak to its security because I (we) won't use it due to its stability issues. If ZFS does use ports it probably uses them for RAID management similar to SVM. I yield, as always, to the wisdom of the documentation.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

ZFS question

How does one set a size limit on a ZFS filesystem? It seems every ZFS FS I create has the same size limit as the parent Zpool. I want to create an FS with a much smaller limit. how? Thanks in advance my friends. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: akbar
3 Replies

2. Solaris

ZFS pool question

I created a pool the other day. I created a 10 gig files just for a test, then deleted it. I proceeded to create a few files systems. But for some reason the pool shows 10% full, but the files systems are both at 1%? Both files systems share the same pool. When I ls -al the pool I just... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: mrlayance
6 Replies

3. Solaris

ZFS question.

I have a oracle instance running in NGZ which is on zfs dataset. Is there any possibility if i can take a zfs snapshot without shutting down the zone and then restore the zfs on other server and start oracle .. will the data be fine or not ? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: fugitive
2 Replies

4. Solaris

zfs-acronym

zfs-zeta bye filesystem or zope filesystem which is correct (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kishanreddy
2 Replies

5. Solaris

Are you using ZFS ?

With Solaris 11 coming out with a requirement of ZFS on the root disk, I was curious to know who is using the Zeta File System now? I have been using ZFS for the past year and don't plan to go back to UFS since ZFS is much more reliable and easier to maintain. (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: bluescreen
13 Replies

6. Solaris

ZFS

what are all the advantages of ZFS comparing to UFS SVM what is the use of creating file system in a file system in ZFS (15 Replies)
Discussion started by: dinu
15 Replies

7. Solaris

ZFS

Hi, I need some advice please. I have this server with a couple of zpools, lets call them pay_serv ukb_pool There are two zones attached to these pools. When I do a zfs list I see this pay_serv 8.41G 265G 8.41G /pay_serv ukb_pool 79.8G 194G 23K /ukb_pool ukb_pool/temp_ps 9.11G... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: giles.cardew
4 Replies

8. Solaris

ZFS mirroring

Hello, I just build a Solaris 10 server on an x86 box. I forgot to mirror the two disks when I install the OS. Can I get some help with this? I have this # zpool list rpool 278G 5.77G 272G 2% ONLINE - # zpool status pool: online state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: ... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: bitlord
12 Replies

9. Solaris

Solaris ZFS question

What I am trying to do is reuse space that was used from an old solaris zone and take that space used in the 2 disk mirror from the 2nd zpool and relocate it to /var/audit in the root pool. The pysical server has 4 disks. 2 disks are a mirrored root zone(c1t0d0s0,c1t1d0s0) and the other were the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jpolachak
1 Replies

10. Solaris

Solaris ZFS and reservations question

I'm having trouble increasing my reservations on some ZFS filesystems, although there seems to be enough space in the zpool, and no constraints on the parent device. Note that I'm using refreservation instead of reservation, so I'm not constrained by the reservation on the parent device (or... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: akbar
1 Replies
deallocate(1)                                                                                                                        deallocate(1)

NAME
deallocate - device deallocation SYNOPSIS
deallocate [-s] device deallocate [-s] [-F] device deallocate [-s] -I The deallocate utility deallocates a device allocated to the evoking user. device can be a device defined in device_allocate(4) or one of the device special files associated with the device. It resets the ownership and the permission on all device special files associated with device, disabling the user's access to that device. This option can be used by an authorized user to remove access to the device by another user. The required authorization is solaris.device.allocate. When deallocation or forced deallocation is performed, the appropriate device cleaning program is executed, based on the contents of device_allocate(4). These cleaning programs are normally stored in /etc/security/lib. The following options are supported: device Deallocate the device associated with the device special file specified by device. -s Silent. Suppresses any diagnostic output. -F device Forces deallocation of the device associated with the file specified by device. Only a user with the solaris.device.revoke authorization is permitted to use this option. -I Forces deallocation of all allocatable devices. Only a user with the solaris.device.revoke authorization is permitted to use this option. This option should only be used at system initialization. The following exit values are returned: non--zero An error occurred. /etc/security/device_allocate /etc/security/device_maps /etc/security/dev/* /etc/security/lib/* See attributes(5) for descriptions of the following attributes: +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ | ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |Availability |SUNWcsu | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ allocate(1), list_devices(1), bsmconv(1M), dminfo(1M), mkdevalloc(1M), mkdevmaps(1M), device_allocate(4), device_maps(4), attributes(5) The functionality described in this man page is available only if the Basic Security Module (BSM) has been enabled. See bsmconv(1M) for more information. /etc/security/dev, mkdevalloc(1M), and mkdevmaps(1M) might not be supported in a future release of the Solaris Operating Environment. 28 Mar 2005 deallocate(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy