Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Help me in finding logic
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Help me in finding logic Post 302305039 by laurentv on Tuesday 7th of April 2009 09:38:43 PM
Old 04-07-2009
senthilkumar,

The main problem I see using a tail is that if you had more then 2000 lines added to the log you will possibly miss an exception.

You could
Step 1- grep for the exception, output the result to a /tmp/search.0 file
Step 2 - if /tmp/search.old exist do a diff with /tmp/search.0 and mail the result
step 3 - renaim /tmp/search.0 /tmp/search.old

unless the log file is very large, (then you might rotate the log more often).

Still I think using wots would be better and you might find more usage to it, like alert you on software or hardware errors ...

- Laurent
 

We Also Found This Discussion For You

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

finding duplicate files by size and finding pattern matching and its count

Hi, I have a challenging task,in which i have to find the duplicate files by its name and size,then i need to take anyone of the file.Then i need to open the file and find for more than one pattern and count of that pattern. Note:These are the samples of two files,but i can have more... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jerome Sukumar
2 Replies
Jifty::Manual::ObjectModel(3pm) 			User Contributed Perl Documentation			   Jifty::Manual::ObjectModel(3pm)

NAME
Jifty::Manual::ObjectModel -- An overview of the Jifty object model OVERVIEW
Jifty applications are generally built in a similar way. There's no reason you need to use the model we've built, but we find it a reasonably OK way to do things. This document should serve as a roadmap to the Jifty class library, as well as an introduction to the way Jifty applications are put together. We start with the classes in your application and move on to the bits of Jifty itself. If you create a brand new application, let's call it "MyWeblog", and create one model class called "MyWeblog::Post", you'll end up with the following files and directories: MyWeblog/ etc/ config.yml lib/ MyWeblog/ Model/ Post.pm Action/ bin/ jifty web/ templates/ static/ t/ #some test files. At least that's the scaffolding Jifty creates for you. Behind the scenes, Jifty is actually doing a lot more. Rather than create a bunch of little "stub" classes and libraries for you, Jifty generates them on the fly. It's always possible to actually create these libraries when you need to customize the default behavior, but we work really hard to make sure you don't need to. Right now, Jifty is automatically creating libraries, static web pages and web templates. We're not 100% satisfied with how Jifty automatically creates web templates and static pages and are working to redesign that. The library you see when creating a Jifty app is: MyWeblog::Model::Post "MyWeblog::Model::Post" describes the schema and business logic of your post class. It uses two namespaces, "MyWeblog::Model::Post::Schema" that has actual column definitions and "MyWeblog::Model::Post" that contains the (optional) business logic, access control and so on. That's it. But if you look carefully at "MyWeblog::Model::Post", you'll see the line: use base qw/MyWeblog::Record/; How can that possibly work? There is no "MyWeblog::Record" class in your application. And Jifty, while it tries to be a comprehensive framework, draws the line somewhat short of including application-specific base classes for every application you might possibly contrive. The answer lies in Jifty::ClassLoader, a utility module Jifty uses to create the boring stuff for you when you need it. It'd certainly be possible for Jifty to create every class you might need as a file on disk when you first create your application (and indeed we may decide to do so if enough people yell at us), but when the stub classes we'd provide are just little shims that inherit from or call to the Jifty core, it doesn't make much sense to create them before you need them. You could build a Jifty application without these shims by having your model classes inherit directly from Jifty::Record, but then you'll run into trouble the second you want to add application-specific code and have to go back and retrofit each and every one of your classes to use your new base class. It's a little thing, but one that can save you a bunch of pain and suffering later on. "MyWeblog::Record" is the first autogenerated class you'll run into but probably not the last. A full list of everything Jifty provides for your new application follows: You get one each of the these: MyWeblog::Record This class is, as discussed above, a thin wrapper around Jifty::Record. You might choose to create your own "MyWeblog::Record" if you want to build in custom access control by overriding "current_user_can" in Jifty::Record or want to implement methods that every model class should have access to. MyWeblog::Collection We haven't talked much about collections yet, but as their name implies, collections are bundles of Jifty::Record objects that match some set of criteria. It's relatively uncommon that you'll want to override this, but if you want the rope, it's here. MyWeblog::Notification "MyWeblog::Notification" is an app-specific implementation of the Jifty::Notification email driver. You might want to override this class if you want to set an application-specific header or footer for all outgoing email. MyWeblog::Dispatcher "MyWeblog::Dispatcher" is an application-specific "dispatcher" class that allows you to write code that runs when a client makes a request to the server before Jifty runs actions or renders templates. See Jifty::Dispatcher for more information about the dispatcher. MyWeblog::CurrentUser Most every web application that grows past a personal hack eventually starts to provide personalization, require access control or otherwise want to know who's currently in the driver's seat. The "current user" for an application is a first-class object in Jifty. To get user-based authentication working out of the box, you'll have to override the default "MyWeblog::CurrentUser". (Out of the box, it treats everyone as the same user.) We're working to generalize the authentication system we've used in a few Jifty apps so far to the point where it feels "right" as a core Jifty component, but we're not quite there just yet. Most of what you'll need to override in "MyWeblog::CurrentUser" is the "_init" function, which needs to load up an application-specific model class that represents one of your users into its "user_object" accessor. To make all this work, you'll also need an application- specific "MyWeblog::Action::Login" and likely also a passel of user-management code. (And yes, this is the topic of a future generalization and a future tutorial. At that point, a bunch of this documentation will be extracted to Jifty::CurrentUser.) But wait! There's more! You also get one each of these for your default model class: MyWeblog::Model::PostCollection It's no fun having a weblog that only shows you one post at a time, is it? Jifty provides you with default Jifty::Collection classes for every Jifty::Record subclass in your model. You get all the standard "limit", "order_by", "columns", paging support and so-on out of the box, but sometimes when you're going to be getting collections matching certain criteria often, it makes sense to actually create your own subclass and start dropping methods in. MyWeblog::Action::CreatePost, MyWeblog::Action::UpdatePost, MyWeblog::Action::DeletePost One of Jifty's strengths is that it makes it easy to build applications by tying application-specific controller functions to your model classes and intuiting what parameters they take by having a look inside the models. For each class in your model, Jifty creates three actions, "Create","Update" and "Delete". They're named, perhaps a bit unadventureously, "MyWeblog::Action::CreatePost", "MyWeblog::Action::UpdatePost", "MyWeblog::Action::DeletePost" and inherit directly from Jifty::Action::Record::Create, Jifty::Action::Record::Update and Jifty::Action::Record::Delete, respectively. Sometimes, it makes sense to override these default actions when you want to change the behaviour of one or more of the actions. One common use is to add or remove AJAX validation or autocompletion for an argument or to change an argument's default value for webforms. This, isn't, however the place to start inserting business logic or access control. That belongs in your model class, which these wrappers will hand things off to. By putting logic in your actions, you make your model classes less useful and run into trouble when you want to start scripting your model outside a web environment. There's no reason you need to stick with these default "implementations" if they're not meeting your needs. Just create your own classes and Jifty will use your real classes instead. perl v5.14.2 2010-12-08 Jifty::Manual::ObjectModel(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy