Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: help with realloc() on Linux
Top Forums Programming help with realloc() on Linux Post 302278619 by Andrewkl on Tuesday 20th of January 2009 05:24:45 PM
Old 01-20-2009
help with realloc() on Linux

hi,

I'm using gcc version 3.4.6 on a Red Hat system... (not sure how to determine version of glibc)
when i run the following, i get:

Code:
glibc detected *** realloc(): invalid next size: 0x0804a170

I'm not sure what is wrong. The error happens on the second iteration of
the while loop.

Code:
#include <stdio.h>

main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
    FILE *fp;
    char *contents;    
    char *tmpptr;

    char buf[2];
    int fd;
    int i = 0;
    long lFileLen = 0;

    char fn[25];    
    fn[0] = '\0';
    
    if (argc < 2) {
    	printf("need argument.\n");
    	exit(1);
    }
    sprintf(fn, "/proc/%s/cmdline", argv[1]);
    
    fp = fopen(fn, "rb"); /* Open in BINARY mode */
    if (fp == NULL) {
        perror("could not open cmdine.");
        printf("path=[%s]\n", fn);
        exit(1);
    }

    contents = (char*) calloc(1, sizeof(char)); 
    
    fd = fileno(fp);
    while ((i = read(fd, buf, 1)) > 0) { /* read 1 char at a time */

     /* the contents of /proc/<pid>/cmdine has embedded null chars, so convert to ' ' */
          if (buf[0] == '\0') 
              buf[0] = ' ';

          lFileLen += i;
          tmpptr = (char*) realloc (contents, lFileLen * sizeof(char) + 1);  /* <<<--- what is wrong??? */

          if (tmpptr == NULL) {
             perror("Unable to realloc()");
             free(contents);
             exit(1);
          } else {
             contents = tmpptr;
          }
          strcat(contents, buf);   /* <<<--- this is related to the realloc() error message, but not sure why??? */
printf("###\n");
          
    } /* while ((i = read(fd, buf, 1)) > 0) */
    
   
    fclose(fp);
    
printf("total length: %ld\n", lFileLen);    
printf("content is [%s]\n", contents); 
printf("strlen: %d\n", strlen(contents)); 
    free(contents);
    free(tmpptr);
}


Last edited by Andrewkl; 01-20-2009 at 08:21 PM..
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Realloc

Can Any body give me a exampla which has the usage of realloc i want a function which uses realloc & increases /decreases the size of a pointer (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: wojtyla
0 Replies

2. Programming

Does realloc free fairly?

Hello, my program works properly but valgrind tells me I am not freeing allocated memory. I think the problem is in realloc. I am pretty sure I do something wrong with realloc, because I changed it a bit and valgrind noticed less errors (that the program wasn't working properly with less errors... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: samciz
3 Replies

3. Programming

tolower (static pointer + malloc + realloc)

N00B here. This function would be easier using a char pointer along with free. But I wish to learn how to use char static pointers (they do not require free, right ?). How do I erase the content of a static pointer ? Terminating the string works but the static pointer's content is not being... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: limmer
4 Replies

4. Programming

malloc vs realloc

Why when using realloc, john is reversed 3 times but not the other 2 names ? But if I use malloc, then the 3 names are reversed correctly ? (but then there is a memory leak) How can I reverse all 3 names without a memory leak ? char *BUFFER = NULL; char *STRREVERSE(const char *STRING) {... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: cyler
5 Replies

5. Programming

What happens when realloc() fails?

Hi, I am seeing varying results about, when realloc() fails in reallocation. Which one is correct out of the below? a) realloc() maintains the original pointer (i.e) the original pointer is left unaltered/untouched but relloc() returns the NULL value. b) original buffer pointer is lost... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: royalibrahim
3 Replies

6. Programming

realloc fails in C : what next ?

Hi all I'm trying to use someone else's software, which has a realloc that fails in it. This is probably due to memory limitations, as it only happens when I use this software on huge datasets. First question : how to diagnose if it's a soft or hard limitation? I mean, if it's due to my... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: jossojjos
10 Replies

7. Programming

Realloc() question

b = realloc(a, 1000); if realloc succeeds and b!=a (not in-place replacement), does realloc automatically free a or I should free both a and b afterwards? thank you! (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: bashuser2
5 Replies

8. Programming

realloc() fails

Not sure in which forum to post this. I'm trying here, in Programming. I'm working on a PC with Intel Duo processor & 2GB of ram. OS is Ubuntu 10.04. I'm having problems with a C++ program that makes extensive use of realloc(). It happens that as soon as the overall memory allocated(OS +... (14 Replies)
Discussion started by: mamboknave
14 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

about realloc routing

#include <malloc.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> int* allocat_array(void) { int *array; int tmp; int n_values = 0 ; array = malloc(sizeof(int)); if(array == NULL) return NULL; while(scanf("%d",&tmp) != EOF) { ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vincent__tse
1 Replies

10. Programming

problem with realloc( i think is gcc :/ )

Hi everyone, i made this program. is a simple one for practising malloc, realloc and structs. I have a struct named shop as global variable in which i take the size of the matrix from the keyboard and after i malloc it. I insert the values with the fullarray() and after i print the matrix with... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: giampoul
7 Replies
READLINK(2)						     Linux Programmer's Manual						       READLINK(2)

NAME
readlink, readlinkat - read value of a symbolic link SYNOPSIS
#include <unistd.h> ssize_t readlink(const char *pathname, char *buf, size_t bufsiz); #include <fcntl.h> /* Definition of AT_* constants */ #include <unistd.h> ssize_t readlinkat(int dirfd, const char *pathname, char *buf, size_t bufsiz); Feature Test Macro Requirements for glibc (see feature_test_macros(7)): readlink(): _XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500 || _POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200112L || /* Glibc versions <= 2.19: */ _BSD_SOURCE readlinkat(): Since glibc 2.10: _POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200809L Before glibc 2.10: _ATFILE_SOURCE DESCRIPTION
readlink() places the contents of the symbolic link pathname in the buffer buf, which has size bufsiz. readlink() does not append a null byte to buf. It will (silently) truncate the contents (to a length of bufsiz characters), in case the buffer is too small to hold all of the contents. readlinkat() The readlinkat() system call operates in exactly the same way as readlink(), except for the differences described here. If the pathname given in pathname is relative, then it is interpreted relative to the directory referred to by the file descriptor dirfd (rather than relative to the current working directory of the calling process, as is done by readlink() for a relative pathname). If pathname is relative and dirfd is the special value AT_FDCWD, then pathname is interpreted relative to the current working directory of the calling process (like readlink()). If pathname is absolute, then dirfd is ignored. Since Linux 2.6.39, pathname can be an empty string, in which case the call operates on the symbolic link referred to by dirfd (which should have been obtained using open(2) with the O_PATH and O_NOFOLLOW flags). See openat(2) for an explanation of the need for readlinkat(). RETURN VALUE
On success, these calls return the number of bytes placed in buf. (If the returned value equals bufsiz, then truncation may have occurred.) On error, -1 is returned and errno is set to indicate the error. ERRORS
EACCES Search permission is denied for a component of the path prefix. (See also path_resolution(7).) EFAULT buf extends outside the process's allocated address space. EINVAL bufsiz is not positive. EINVAL The named file (i.e., the final filename component of pathname) is not a symbolic link. EIO An I/O error occurred while reading from the filesystem. ELOOP Too many symbolic links were encountered in translating the pathname. ENAMETOOLONG A pathname, or a component of a pathname, was too long. ENOENT The named file does not exist. ENOMEM Insufficient kernel memory was available. ENOTDIR A component of the path prefix is not a directory. The following additional errors can occur for readlinkat(): EBADF dirfd is not a valid file descriptor. ENOTDIR pathname is relative and dirfd is a file descriptor referring to a file other than a directory. VERSIONS
readlinkat() was added to Linux in kernel 2.6.16; library support was added to glibc in version 2.4. CONFORMING TO
readlink(): 4.4BSD (readlink() first appeared in 4.2BSD), POSIX.1-2001, POSIX.1-2008. readlinkat(): POSIX.1-2008. NOTES
In versions of glibc up to and including glibc 2.4, the return type of readlink() was declared as int. Nowadays, the return type is declared as ssize_t, as (newly) required in POSIX.1-2001. Using a statically sized buffer might not provide enough room for the symbolic link contents. The required size for the buffer can be obtained from the stat.st_size value returned by a call to lstat(2) on the link. However, the number of bytes written by readlink() and readlinkat() should be checked to make sure that the size of the symbolic link did not increase between the calls. Dynamically allocating the buffer for readlink() and readlinkat() also addresses a common portability problem when using PATH_MAX for the buffer size, as this constant is not guaranteed to be defined per POSIX if the system does not have such limit. Glibc notes On older kernels where readlinkat() is unavailable, the glibc wrapper function falls back to the use of readlink(). When pathname is a relative pathname, glibc constructs a pathname based on the symbolic link in /proc/self/fd that corresponds to the dirfd argument. EXAMPLE
The following program allocates the buffer needed by readlink() dynamically from the information provided by lstat(2), falling back to a buffer of size PATH_MAX in cases where lstat(2) reports a size of zero. #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <limits.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { struct stat sb; char *buf; ssize_t nbytes, bufsiz; if (argc != 2) { fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <pathname> ", argv[0]); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } if (lstat(argv[1], &sb) == -1) { perror("lstat"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } /* Add one to the link size, so that we can determine whether the buffer returned by readlink() was truncated. */ bufsiz = sb.st_size + 1; /* Some magic symlinks under (for example) /proc and /sys report 'st_size' as zero. In that case, take PATH_MAX as a "good enough" estimate. */ if (sb.st_size == 0) bufsiz = PATH_MAX; buf = malloc(bufsiz); if (buf == NULL) { perror("malloc"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } nbytes = readlink(argv[1], buf, bufsiz); if (nbytes == -1) { perror("readlink"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } printf("'%s' points to '%.*s' ", argv[1], (int) nbytes, buf); /* If the return value was equal to the buffer size, then the the link target was larger than expected (perhaps because the target was changed between the call to lstat() and the call to readlink()). Warn the user that the returned target may have been truncated. */ if (nbytes == bufsiz) printf("(Returned buffer may have been truncated) "); free(buf); exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); } SEE ALSO
readlink(1), lstat(2), stat(2), symlink(2), realpath(3), path_resolution(7), symlink(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 4.15 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, information about reporting bugs, and the latest version of this page, can be found at https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2017-09-15 READLINK(2)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy