Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Does realloc free fairly?
Top Forums Programming Does realloc free fairly? Post 302274620 by mosaic on Thursday 8th of January 2009 02:49:16 AM
Old 01-08-2009
You can refer the manual page of realloc. it should be like this:

str1 = realloc(str1, 15 * sizeof(char));

in such case, realloc will free the memory allocated before if need.

when the first parameter is NULL, its function is the same with malloc, of course there is memory leak.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Realloc

Can Any body give me a exampla which has the usage of realloc i want a function which uses realloc & increases /decreases the size of a pointer (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: wojtyla
0 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Fairly new to scripting

Hi, my team has existing ftp scripts that basically ftp files from one server to the other. Can anyone show me how to add some lines where if the ftp fails, an email could be sent out to myself and others on my team so that we are alerted? Thanks in advance. (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: ocanyc
11 Replies

3. Programming

help with realloc() on Linux

hi, I'm using gcc version 3.4.6 on a Red Hat system... (not sure how to determine version of glibc) when i run the following, i get: glibc detected *** realloc(): invalid next size: 0x0804a170 I'm not sure what is wrong. The error happens on the second iteration of the while loop.... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Andrewkl
3 Replies

4. Programming

Read/Write a fairly large amount of data to a file as fast as possible

Hi, I'm trying to figure out the best solution to the following problem, and I'm not yet that much experienced like you. :-) Basically I have to read a fairly large file, composed of "messages" , in order to display all of them through an user interface (made with QT). The messages that... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: emitrax
3 Replies

5. Programming

malloc vs realloc

Why when using realloc, john is reversed 3 times but not the other 2 names ? But if I use malloc, then the 3 names are reversed correctly ? (but then there is a memory leak) How can I reverse all 3 names without a memory leak ? char *BUFFER = NULL; char *STRREVERSE(const char *STRING) {... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: cyler
5 Replies

6. Programming

What happens when realloc() fails?

Hi, I am seeing varying results about, when realloc() fails in reallocation. Which one is correct out of the below? a) realloc() maintains the original pointer (i.e) the original pointer is left unaltered/untouched but relloc() returns the NULL value. b) original buffer pointer is lost... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: royalibrahim
3 Replies

7. Programming

realloc fails in C : what next ?

Hi all I'm trying to use someone else's software, which has a realloc that fails in it. This is probably due to memory limitations, as it only happens when I use this software on huge datasets. First question : how to diagnose if it's a soft or hard limitation? I mean, if it's due to my... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: jossojjos
10 Replies

8. Programming

realloc() fails

Not sure in which forum to post this. I'm trying here, in Programming. I'm working on a PC with Intel Duo processor & 2GB of ram. OS is Ubuntu 10.04. I'm having problems with a C++ program that makes extensive use of realloc(). It happens that as soon as the overall memory allocated(OS +... (14 Replies)
Discussion started by: mamboknave
14 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

about realloc routing

#include <malloc.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> int* allocat_array(void) { int *array; int tmp; int n_values = 0 ; array = malloc(sizeof(int)); if(array == NULL) return NULL; while(scanf("%d",&tmp) != EOF) { ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vincent__tse
1 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Help on a fairly complicated shell script

Hello, also with the help of some great users of this forum, I have created following shell script. MM=120 GG=5000 # get size of directory szm=$(du -s --block-size M ./192.168.1.xxx | awk '{print int($0)}') data=$(date --rfc-3339=seconds) if ; then # too big delete older files ... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: dcaccount
10 Replies
bsdmalloc(3MALLOC)														bsdmalloc(3MALLOC)

NAME
bsdmalloc - memory allocator SYNOPSIS
cc [ flag ... ] file ... -lbsdmalloc [ library ... ] char *malloc(size); unsigned size; int free( ptr); char *ptr; char *realloc( ptr, size); char *ptr; unsigned size; These routines provide a general-purpose memory allocation package. They maintain a table of free blocks for efficient allocation and coa- lescing of free storage. When there is no suitable space already free, the allocation routines call sbrk(2) to get more memory from the system. Each of the allocation routines returns a pointer to space suitably aligned for storage of any type of object. Each returns a null pointer if the request cannot be completed. The malloc() function returns a pointer to a block of at least size bytes, which is appropriately aligned. The free() function releases a previously allocated block. Its argument is a pointer to a block previously allocated by malloc() or real- loc(). The free() function does not set errno. The realloc() function changes the size of the block pointed to by ptr to size bytes and returns a pointer to the (possibly moved) block. The contents will be unchanged up to the lesser of the new and old sizes. If the new size of the block requires movement of the block, the space for the previous instantiation of the block is freed. If the new size is larger, the contents of the newly allocated portion of the block are unspecified. If ptr is NULL, realloc() behaves like malloc() for the specified size. If size is 0 and ptr is not a null pointer, the space pointed to is freed. The malloc() and realloc() functions return a null pointer if there is not enough available memory. They return a non-null pointer if size is 0. These pointers should not be dereferenced. When realloc() returns NULL, the block pointed to by ptr is left intact. Always cast the value returned by malloc() and realloc(). If malloc() or realloc() returns unsuccessfully, errno will be set to indicate the following: ENOMEM size bytes of memory cannot be allocated because it exceeds the physical limits of the system. EAGAIN There is not enough memory available at this point in time to allocate size bytes of memory; but the application could try again later. Using realloc() with a block freed before the most recent call to malloc() or realloc() results in an error. Comparative features of the various allocation libraries can be found in the umem_alloc(3MALLOC) manual page. brk(2), malloc(3C), malloc(3MALLOC), mapmalloc(3MALLOC), umem_alloc(3MALLOC) WARNINGS
Use of libbsdmalloc renders an application non-SCD compliant. The libbsdmalloc routines are incompatible with the memory allocation routines in the standard C-library (libc): malloc(3C), alloca(3C), calloc(3C), free(3C), memalign(3C), realloc(3C), and valloc(3C). 21 Mar 2005 bsdmalloc(3MALLOC)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy