01-06-2009
I can't see any effective difference aside from the extra complications of effectively returning two values in your first example. I'd tend to avoid that kind of redundancy in case my fumble fingers ever cause one to contradict the other.
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Programming
void main()
{
int a={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10};
int *p=a;
int *q=&a;
cout<<q-p+1<<endl;
}
The output is 10, how?
if we give cout<<q it will print the address, value won't print....
if we give cout<<p it will print the address, value won't print....
p has the base addr; q... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sarwan
1 Replies
2. Programming
Hi,
char *s="yamaha";
cout<<s<<endl;
int *p;
int i=10;
p=&i;
cout<<p<<endl;
1) For the 1st "cout" we will get "yamaha" as output. That is we are getting "content of the address" for cout<<s.
2) But for integer "cout<<p" we are getting the "address only".
Please clarify how we are... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sweta
2 Replies
3. Programming
could any one tell why the following is showing segmentation fault while using **ptr
but working fine using **a
#include<stdio.h>
... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: useless79
1 Replies
4. Programming
what is far pointer in C (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: useless79
1 Replies
5. Programming
Hello all
im trying to build function that will return void function pointer
what is mean is ( not working )
the main function
void * myClass::getFunction(int type){
if(type==1)
return &myClass::Test1;
if(type==2)
return &myClass::Test2;
}
void myClass::Test1(){... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: umen
1 Replies
6. Programming
Can anyone tell me what the following statements do?
float (*tab);
tab=(float (*)) calloc(MAXCLASS,
(MAXCLASS+1)*sizeof(float)); (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: littleboyblu
3 Replies
7. Programming
I have a fundamental question on C pointer arithmetry..
Suppose i have a c string pointer already pointing to a valid location, Can I just do a
charptr = charptr +1;
to get to the next location, irregardless if my program is 32 or 64 bits?
or should i do it this way:
charptr =... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Leion
1 Replies
8. Programming
Hi guys, I'm trying to understand pointers in C and made a simple example and I've problems with It.
Can someone help?
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
int f1(char **str_);
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char *str = NULL;
f1(&str);
... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: pharaoh
3 Replies
9. Programming
I am struggling with the pointer to 2D-array (cf: 2D array of pointers). Can anybody help me elaborate how the pointer x moves in the memory to access the individual of y, especially the high lighted lines?
I have talked to one of the curators of the forum, but I am still not quite clear.
Here... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: yifangt
1 Replies
10. Programming
I am passing a char* to the function "reverse" and when I execute it with gdb I get:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000000000040083b in reverse (s=0x400b2b "hello") at pointersExample.c:72
72 *q = *p;
Attached is the source code.
I do not understand why... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: jose_spain
9 Replies
LEARN ABOUT SUNOS
setreuid
setreuid(2) System Calls setreuid(2)
NAME
setreuid - set real and effective user IDs
SYNOPSIS
#include <unistd.h>
int setreuid(uid_t ruid, uid_t euid);
DESCRIPTION
The setreuid() function is used to set the real and effective user IDs of the calling process. If ruid is -1, the real user ID is not
changed; if euid is -1, the effective user ID is not changed. The real and effective user IDs may be set to different values in the same
call.
If the {PRIV_PROC_SETID} privilege is asserted in the effective set of the calling process, the real user ID and the effective user ID can
be set to any legal value.
If the {PRIV_PROC_SETID} privilege is not asserted in the effective set of the calling process, either the real user ID can be set to the
effective user ID, or the effective user ID can either be set to the saved set-user ID from execve() (seeexec(2)) or the real user ID.
In either case, if the real user ID is being changed (that is, if ruid is not -1), or the effective user ID is being changed to a value
not equal to the real user ID, the saved set-user ID is set equal to the new effective user ID.
All privileges are required to change to uid 0.
RETURN VALUES
Upon successful completion, 0 is returned. Otherwise, -1 is returned, errno is set to indicate the error, and neither of the user IDs will
be changed.
ERRORS
The setreuid() function will fail if:
EINVAL The value of ruid or euid is less than 0 or greater than UID_MAX (defined in <limits.h>).
EPERM The {PRIV_PROC_SETID} privilege is not asserted in the effective set of the calling processes and a change was specified
other than changing the real user ID to the effective user ID, or changing the effective user ID to the real user ID or the
saved set-user ID. See privileges(5) for additional restrictions which apply when changing to UID 0.
USAGE
If a set-user-ID process sets its effective user ID to its real user ID, it can still set its effective user ID back to the saved set-user
ID.
ATTRIBUTES
See attributes(5) for descriptions of the following attributes:
+-----------------------------+-----------------------------+
| ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE |
+-----------------------------+-----------------------------+
|Interface Stability |Standard |
+-----------------------------+-----------------------------+
SEE ALSO
exec(2), getuid(2), setregid(2), setuid(2), attributes(5), privileges(5), standards(5)
SunOS 5.10 22 Mar 2004 setreuid(2)