12-02-2008
are all dependencies online?
9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Solaris
Hi all,
I am using Solaris 10 OS on X86 platform. Long back i tried to configure DHCP server on my system but because of rpc-bind, total went in vein.Even now i am unable to access even USB also. When i tried to look for "volfs" service it was offline because one of its dependant... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: vvpotugunta
0 Replies
2. Solaris
I would like to disable RPC bind permanently since I am not going to use rpc bind to network to any other machines. How do I do this so I can stop getting all these error messages? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: jastanle84
3 Replies
3. Solaris
while i trying to mount from NAS i have this messages
mount -F nfs -o rw 172.16.110.13:/tremabkup /tremabkup
nfs mount: 172.16.110.13: : RPC: Rpcbind failure - RPC: Timed out
nfs mount: retrying: /tremabkup
nfs mount: 172.16.110.13: : RPC: Rpcbind failure - RPC: Timed out
nfs mount:... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: thecobra151
2 Replies
4. Solaris
C: Rpcbind failure - RPC: Timed out error (solaris)
hello an nfs server on my sun fire v440 is not responding , i get the error bellow and lots of my networking services are not reponding, please helppppp its an emergency
RPC: Rpcbind failure - RPC: Timed out
i also get
NFS server... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: feg
2 Replies
5. Solaris
My code
Hi Folks,
I am getting maintanance error for rpc/bind in one of solaris 10 server.I have tried disable,enabled,cleared all options and dont no how to make online.Please help me
Please find the below for details :-
Server1> svcs -a rpc/bind
svcs: -a ignored when used with... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: susindram
0 Replies
6. Red Hat
Hi All,
Distros of machines : RHEL6
Bind Vesrion : Bind-9.7-3.2
I am trying to set up a test DNS for my home network. I have two rhel 6 machines A and B. Machine A has 2 NICs and is acting as a router also, one NIC is facing intranet and the otehr is facing intranet. On machine A i have... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Rohit Bhanot
0 Replies
7. Solaris
Fails to mount the server (10.125.224.22) during installation of a software on client, throwing the below error:
nfs mount: 10.125.224.22: : RPC: Rpcbind failure - RPC: Timed out
nfs mount: retrying: /cdrom
This happened after complete shutdown of the lab. The server came up fine but most... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: frintocf
1 Replies
8. Red Hat
Hello friends
Internet query not working anymore with bind , i am not using forwarder dns server .
1.
resolv.conf file =>
search local.server
nameserver 127.0.0.1
2.
named.conf file =>
//
// named.conf
//
// Provided by Red Hat bind package to configure the ISC BIND named(8) DNS... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: rink
8 Replies
9. Solaris
Hi,
I have an issue with RPC bind service and its failing with status 1. any help would be much appreciated.
THanks (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Yakub Humami
2 Replies
LEARN ABOUT SUSE
deb-shlibs
deb-shlibs(5) dpkg suite deb-shlibs(5)
NAME
deb-shlibs - Debian shared library information file
DESCRIPTION
shlibs files map shared library names and versions (sonames) to dependencies suitable for a package control file. There is one entry per
line. Blank lines are not allowed. Lines beginning with an # character are considered commentary, and are ignored. All other lines must
have the format
[type:] library version dependencies
The library and version fields are whitespace-delimited, but the dependencies field extends to the end of the line. The type field is
optional and normally not needed.
The dependencies field has the same syntax as the Depends field in a binary control file, see deb-control(5).
EXAMPLES
The shlibs file for a typical library package, named libcrunch1, that provides one library whose soname is libcrunch.so.1, might read
libcrunch 1 libcrunch1 (>= 1.2-1)
The dependencies must mention the most recent version of the package that added new symbols to the library: in the above example, new
symbols were added to version 1.2 of libcrunch. This is not the only reason the dependencies might need to be tightened.
SEE ALSO
deb-control(5), dpkg-shlibdeps(1), deb-symbols(5).
1.19.0.5 2018-04-16 deb-shlibs(5)