Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Nucleus to Linux porting
Top Forums Programming Nucleus to Linux porting Post 302258861 by taklubaba on Sunday 16th of November 2008 11:01:32 AM
Old 11-16-2008
Nucleus to Linux porting

I am new to Linux programming and my work involves changing an abstraction layer which made Nucleus calls, to Linux calls.

In Case of Events Nucleus has calls like
NU_Set_Events()
NU_Retrieve_Events()

Can I use the POSIX thread conditional variables for Linux?
Can I use the System V calls for events for threads of a same process? Please let me know how I can go about doing it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Case of Pipes Nucleus has calls like
NU_Send_To_Pipe()
NU_Receive_From_Pipe()
NU_Send_To_Front_Of_Pipe()

These calls have a suspend as one parameter by which the pipe can be suspended or can return back immediately if the pipe cannot be written into or read from.
But in Linux, in case of pipes created by pipe() or open() system call, the pipe has only the suspend functionality where in it will suspend till it can read from or write to pipe.

Moreover in Nucleus, NU_Send_To_Front_Of_Pipe() writes to front of the pipe for urgent messages.

How do I implement these functionalities in Linux?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of Mutexes and Semaphores,
The Nucleus has functionalities where the thread can try locking mutexes or acquiring semaphores for a specified amount of time, after which they return back if mutex/semaphore is unavailable.
How can this be implemented in Linux? Can nanosleep() be used here?

Kindly suggest some solutions.
Thanks.

Taklu.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Porting Win32 application into Linux

I need port Win32 console application, which was developed with MS Visual Studio 6.0 (without MFC using) into Linux. What is the best way to port project? Are there any standard tools or decisions? Thank you in advance, Sergey (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Sergeyy
0 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

HP-UX to linux porting

Hi all, i wanted to port some HP-UX code to linux. can anybody point to some documents or resources that would help me in doing the porting.. thanks in advance Arun Prakash (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: arunprakash
0 Replies

3. Programming

Porting From Linux To Hpux

Gents, i'm a senior applications developer and need to port a Linux server application ( no additional / special libraries or unique header files ) to a HPUX enviroment. Any chance to compile it on the Linux using flags to create an HPUX binary with gcc? (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: anak0nda
8 Replies

4. Linux

when porting from HP-UX to Linux

helo, i m porting HP-UX socket application to Linux SSL-socket application. I have use htonl() in HP-UX. so when i use it in Linux, data transf is not done and application become soem time crashed. now when i remove htonl() in linux, then i got data but it will not proper order or some data may... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: amitpansuria
1 Replies

5. Linux

Porting DHCP from Linux to VxWorks

Hello All, I have a code of DHCP which is implemented on Linux. During porting this code from Linux to VxWorks, I come up with following errors:- jects\freedom\ap\udhcp\socket.c C:\projects\freedom\ap\udhcp\socket.c: In function `read_interface': C:\projects\freedom\ap\udhcp\socket.c:79:... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Sunny Shivam
1 Replies

6. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Porting OSE to Linux

Hi, I was trying to port efs_mount(OSE system call) to a LInux.The efs_mount function is used to mount a volume on the indicated device dev.Upon successful completion of this OSE sytem call a volume manager (VM) will be available through which files on this volume are accessed. The Syntax for... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: roshantraj30
4 Replies

7. Solaris

Porting a Linux Driver to Solaris

Hi all, Has anyone experience with proting a Linux driver (C-code) to Solaris 10? I have a Sunix SATA card with a inicio1622 chipset, but no driver available. From the website of inicio I downloaded the drivercode for Linux 2.4. Having done some investigation I found a Solaris driver... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: longwave
4 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Porting from Solaris to Linux

Can any one please help the use of "cu command in Solaris" and as well as in Linux :confused: (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sabee.prakash
1 Replies

9. Programming

Porting Rogue Wave to Linux

I am challenged with porting an old application from Solaris to Red Hat. The application uses Rogue Wave and I am searching for a Red Hat implementation. Your help is appreciated! (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: FunkyWinkerbean
2 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Porting script from Solaris to Linux

I have a script which has commands that are located in different paths on my Linux o/s than on Solaris. For example, to make uname work, I need to do it this way in Solaris: my $host= `/usr/bin/uname -n` But in Linux it is: my $host = `/bin/uname -n`I have this issue with at least 5... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: newbie2010
8 Replies
PIPE(7) 						     Linux Programmer's Manual							   PIPE(7)

NAME
pipe - overview of pipes and FIFOs DESCRIPTION
Pipes and FIFOs (also known as named pipes) provide a unidirectional interprocess communication channel. A pipe has a read end and a write end. Data written to the write end of a pipe can be read from the read end of the pipe. A pipe is created using pipe(2), which creates a new pipe and returns two file descriptors, one referring to the read end of the pipe, the other referring to the write end. Pipes can be used to create a communication channel between related processes; see pipe(2) for an exam- ple. A FIFO (short for First In First Out) has a name within the file system (created using mkfifo(3)), and is opened using open(2). Any process may open a FIFO, assuming the file permissions allow it. The read end is opened using the O_RDONLY flag; the write end is opened using the O_WRONLY flag. See fifo(7) for further details. Note: although FIFOs have a pathname in the file system, I/O on FIFOs does not involve operations on the underlying device (if there is one). I/O on Pipes and FIFOs The only difference between pipes and FIFOs is the manner in which they are created and opened. Once these tasks have been accomplished, I/O on pipes and FIFOs has exactly the same semantics. If a process attempts to read from an empty pipe, then read(2) will block until data is available. If a process attempts to write to a full pipe (see below), then write(2) blocks until sufficient data has been read from the pipe to allow the write to complete. Nonblocking I/O is possible by using the fcntl(2) F_SETFL operation to enable the O_NONBLOCK open file status flag. The communication channel provided by a pipe is a byte stream: there is no concept of message boundaries. If all file descriptors referring to the write end of a pipe have been closed, then an attempt to read(2) from the pipe will see end-of- file (read(2) will return 0). If all file descriptors referring to the read end of a pipe have been closed, then a write(2) will cause a SIGPIPE signal to be generated for the calling process. If the calling process is ignoring this signal, then write(2) fails with the error EPIPE. An application that uses pipe(2) and fork(2) should use suitable close(2) calls to close unnecessary duplicate file descriptors; this ensures that end-of-file and SIGPIPE/EPIPE are delivered when appropriate. It is not possible to apply lseek(2) to a pipe. Pipe Capacity A pipe has a limited capacity. If the pipe is full, then a write(2) will block or fail, depending on whether the O_NONBLOCK flag is set (see below). Different implementations have different limits for the pipe capacity. Applications should not rely on a particular capac- ity: an application should be designed so that a reading process consumes data as soon as it is available, so that a writing process does not remain blocked. In Linux versions before 2.6.11, the capacity of a pipe was the same as the system page size (e.g., 4096 bytes on i386). Since Linux 2.6.11, the pipe capacity is 65536 bytes. PIPE_BUF POSIX.1-2001 says that write(2)s of less than PIPE_BUF bytes must be atomic: the output data is written to the pipe as a contiguous sequence. Writes of more than PIPE_BUF bytes may be nonatomic: the kernel may interleave the data with data written by other processes. POSIX.1-2001 requires PIPE_BUF to be at least 512 bytes. (On Linux, PIPE_BUF is 4096 bytes.) The precise semantics depend on whether the file descriptor is nonblocking (O_NONBLOCK), whether there are multiple writers to the pipe, and on n, the number of bytes to be written: O_NONBLOCK disabled, n <= PIPE_BUF All n bytes are written atomically; write(2) may block if there is not room for n bytes to be written immediately O_NONBLOCK enabled, n <= PIPE_BUF If there is room to write n bytes to the pipe, then write(2) succeeds immediately, writing all n bytes; otherwise write(2) fails, with errno set to EAGAIN. O_NONBLOCK disabled, n > PIPE_BUF The write is nonatomic: the data given to write(2) may be interleaved with write(2)s by other process; the write(2) blocks until n bytes have been written. O_NONBLOCK enabled, n > PIPE_BUF If the pipe is full, then write(2) fails, with errno set to EAGAIN. Otherwise, from 1 to n bytes may be written (i.e., a "partial write" may occur; the caller should check the return value from write(2) to see how many bytes were actually written), and these bytes may be interleaved with writes by other processes. Open File Status Flags The only open file status flags that can be meaningfully applied to a pipe or FIFO are O_NONBLOCK and O_ASYNC. Setting the O_ASYNC flag for the read end of a pipe causes a signal (SIGIO by default) to be generated when new input becomes available on the pipe (see fcntl(2) for details). On Linux, O_ASYNC is supported for pipes and FIFOs only since kernel 2.6. Portability notes On some systems (but not Linux), pipes are bidirectional: data can be transmitted in both directions between the pipe ends. According to POSIX.1-2001, pipes only need to be unidirectional. Portable applications should avoid reliance on bidirectional pipe semantics. SEE ALSO
dup(2), fcntl(2), open(2), pipe(2), poll(2), select(2), socketpair(2), stat(2), mkfifo(3), epoll(7), fifo(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.44 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2005-12-08 PIPE(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy