Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Help mounting Windows share in UNIX Post 302230077 by shatterstorm on Thursday 28th of August 2008 02:47:23 PM
Old 08-28-2008
When I cd to oink, it says oink does not exist.

When I ls oink, it gives me a permission denied. I would have thought allowing anonymous access would take care of permissions.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions

Mounting a windows share on AIX

Hi, How can I mount a Windows share (over samba) on an AIX machine? I know there is a utility called smbmount on Linux, but alas, I cannot find out how to the same thing on AIX. anyone have any ideas? thanks! (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: szahir1
3 Replies

2. Linux

how i can share the file between unix or linux in windows ??

hello everybody i have one quetion :( about how i can share my file in windows to use it in linux explane i have to opreating system windows xp and linux fedore core and unix ( sun solaris 10 ) and i want to open me file that is storege in windows <<< want to open it in unix or... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: msn22
4 Replies

3. HP-UX

Mounting of unix NFS to windows XP

is it possible? i will only config on the windows side. is there a third party software to help me accomplish this? tnx (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Amaru
3 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

How to Mount a Unix share drive on Windows

We are trying to mount a Unix share drive on a Windows 2003 server to avoid transfering files accross the network using sftp. I can see shared drives on the Solaris server using the "share" command. How can I mount the drives on my Windows server so that I can read them directly. Do I need... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: rbdenham
2 Replies

5. Solaris

mounting windows share folder

please help me,,i need step to mount windows share folder,,i try samba and nfs and it didnt work (in my linux server the command is fine),,can somenone give me an example for this to be done? (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Cellscript
0 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

[Solved] error while mounting windows share on linux

Hi whan i am trying to mount a windows share on linux i received the following error can some one help me with thsi # mount -t cifs \\\\servername\testdata -o username=xw27,password=*es*feed /test Mounting the DFS root for a particular server not implemented yet No ip address specified... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: robo
5 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Mounting a standard user, windows share at login

I know how to mount my share via /etc/fstab automatically when the system boots but since I do not have root permission to access the /etc/fstab nor do I think that the system admin wants me to add an entry in /etc/fstab all together. So what file could I add my mount entry in? mount -t cifs... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: metallica1973
8 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Ftp from UNIX to windows share

Unix Expects, I am trying to connect to Unix server to windows share point using ftp or fstp. I want to get excel file from windows share to unix server. But i am not able to do it. Can you please help me on this. :confused: Cheers (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: AraR87
6 Replies

9. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Mounting Windows Share to Linux Server

Hi Folks - I need to mount a Windows Share to a Linux server. What is the best/easiest way to do this? Is this 'how-to' guide accurate: How to Share Files Between Windows and Linux Or is there a better method you could share? Thanks! (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: SIMMS7400
8 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Mounting a samba share

Hi, I need to mount a directory from a Windows server to a CentOS box. The Windows server used is Windows Server 2003, and the path to the directory that I want to mount on CentOS is C:\Tomcat6\webapps\NASApp\logs. I am not sure of the correct way to mount this on CentOS, as most of the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: anaigini45
2 Replies
ACCESS(2)						     Linux Programmer's Manual							 ACCESS(2)

NAME
access - check real user's permissions for a file SYNOPSIS
#include <unistd.h> int access(const char *pathname, int mode); DESCRIPTION
access() checks whether the calling process can access the file pathname. If pathname is a symbolic link, it is dereferenced. The mode specifies the accessibility check(s) to be performed, and is either the value F_OK, or a mask consisting of the bitwise OR of one or more of R_OK, W_OK, and X_OK. F_OK tests for the existence of the file. R_OK, W_OK, and X_OK test whether the file exists and grants read, write, and execute permissions, respectively. The check is done using the calling process's real UID and GID, rather than the effective IDs as is done when actually attempting an opera- tion (e.g., open(2)) on the file. This allows set-user-ID programs to easily determine the invoking user's authority. If the calling process is privileged (i.e., its real UID is zero), then an X_OK check is successful for a regular file if execute permis- sion is enabled for any of the file owner, group, or other. RETURN VALUE
On success (all requested permissions granted), zero is returned. On error (at least one bit in mode asked for a permission that is denied, or some other error occurred), -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately. ERRORS
access() shall fail if: EACCES The requested access would be denied to the file, or search permission is denied for one of the directories in the path prefix of pathname. (See also path_resolution(7).) ELOOP Too many symbolic links were encountered in resolving pathname. ENAMETOOLONG pathname is too long. ENOENT A component of pathname does not exist or is a dangling symbolic link. ENOTDIR A component used as a directory in pathname is not, in fact, a directory. EROFS Write permission was requested for a file on a read-only file system. access() may fail if: EFAULT pathname points outside your accessible address space. EINVAL mode was incorrectly specified. EIO An I/O error occurred. ENOMEM Insufficient kernel memory was available. ETXTBSY Write access was requested to an executable which is being executed. CONFORMING TO
SVr4, 4.3BSD, POSIX.1-2001. NOTES
Warning: Using access() to check if a user is authorized to, for example, open a file before actually doing so using open(2) creates a security hole, because the user might exploit the short time interval between checking and opening the file to manipulate it. For this reason, the use of this system call should be avoided. access() returns an error if any of the access types in mode is denied, even if some of the other access types in mode are permitted. If the calling process has appropriate privileges (i.e., is superuser), POSIX.1-2001 permits implementation to indicate success for an X_OK check even if none of the execute file permission bits are set. Linux does not do this. A file is only accessible if the permissions on each of the directories in the path prefix of pathname grant search (i.e., execute) access. If any directory is inaccessible, then the access() call will fail, regardless of the permissions on the file itself. Only access bits are checked, not the file type or contents. Therefore, if a directory is found to be writable, it probably means that files can be created in the directory, and not that the directory can be written as a file. Similarly, a DOS file may be found to be "exe- cutable," but the execve(2) call will still fail. access() may not work correctly on NFS file systems with UID mapping enabled, because UID mapping is done on the server and hidden from the client, which checks permissions. BUGS
In kernel 2.4 (and earlier) there is some strangeness in the handling of X_OK tests for superuser. If all categories of execute permission are disabled for a nondirectory file, then the only access() test that returns -1 is when mode is specified as just X_OK; if R_OK or W_OK is also specified in mode, then access() returns 0 for such files. Early 2.6 kernels (up to and including 2.6.3) also behaved in the same way as kernel 2.4. In kernels before 2.6.20, access() ignored the effect of the MS_NOEXEC flag if it was used to mount(2) the underlying file system. Since kernel 2.6.20, access() honors this flag. SEE ALSO
chmod(2), chown(2), faccessat(2), open(2), setgid(2), setuid(2), stat(2), euidaccess(3), credentials(7), path_resolution(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.27 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2007-07-10 ACCESS(2)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy