Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Dns/bind
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Dns/bind Post 302227729 by jamison_utter on Thursday 21st of August 2008 10:32:15 PM
Old 08-21-2008
*.example.com. IN A host1.example.com.

Literally like that, a wild card record
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

DNS/BIND question, is it ze germans?

First some back ground info: I am working on a computer running SuSE 7.3 I am still trying to set up a DNS I downloaded BIND 9.2.1 and was following a tutorial about BIND. It said at virtually the start of the tutorial that I should find a file called named.conf in my /etc directory. Yes, I... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ignus7
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

BIND DNS replication

I have a RedHat 7.1 box that we use for DNS in our System Engineering lab. We have a Windows 2000 box that handles DNS in our main office. The Microsoft Admin and I have been given the task of making both of our domains accessible to each other. I had originally made his domain my forwarder, so... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Jody
5 Replies

3. IP Networking

Question on DNS/BIND

I have set up a BIND server running on Redhat AS 3.0 and the question I have is that I can point my laptop to that server and resolve all the hosts I have put in my .zone file but for the life of me I can resolve any outside information. I have verified the server can talk to the world. Any hints... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Acleoma
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

FTP, DNS & BIND

Hi GURUs, I have two queries. 1)I know I can use FTP clients for my File transfer needs, but I want to learn FTP thru command line, any one can point me to some good online resource available to learn FTP command line with examples, of course free except UNIX man pages. 2) Our company has... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: patras
4 Replies

5. Solaris

solaris - BIND / DNS

hi all forgive my ignorance, but when IVe set up DNS Ive put in the various server details in the /etc/resolv.conf and away I go. Suddenly Ive been reading about DNS, and I need to created a /etc/named.conf file. so, my question is this. DNS, what part does the /etc/resolv.conf play in... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: sbk1972
3 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

DNS Bind

Hello, I have a question about dns file zone. Every zone file begins like: @ 86400 IN SOA ns1.website.com. admin@website.com. ( It means that name server ns1 is responsible for this zone. At the ending I can add the records like mysite.com IN A 1.2.3.4 So it will... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mirusnet
2 Replies

7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

DNS server choice: Windows DNS vs Linux BIND

I'd like to get some opnions on choosing DNS server: Windows DNS vs Linux BIND comparrsion: 1) managment, easy of use 2) Security 3) features 4) peformance 5) ?? I personally prefer Windows DNS server for management, it supports GUI and command line. But I am not sure about security... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: honglus
2 Replies

8. Red Hat

Public dns bind 9

Hi Friends, I need help to understand how to publish my public dns to internet. I have configured bind 9 on thel5 server and it working fine. My question is, as i donot want to expose my orginal hostname to outside and my zone files are configured with the NS recorde of the orginal hostname,... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: arumon
5 Replies

9. Red Hat

Split DNS not working with Bind-9.7

Hi All, Distros of machines : RHEL6 Bind Vesrion : Bind-9.7-3.2 I am trying to set up a test DNS for my home network. I have two rhel 6 machines A and B. Machine A has 2 NICs and is acting as a router also, one NIC is facing intranet and the otehr is facing intranet. On machine A i have... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Rohit Bhanot
0 Replies

10. Red Hat

Bind (DNS) error on EL 6.4

Gurus I have configured bind 9 on Red hat EL 6.4, it can resolve from hostname i.e from domain name (like cnn.com, bbc.com)but through IP its shows following error. Need your expert opinion to solve it. error 84.23.97.31 Server: 192.168.31.24 Address: 192.168.31.24#53 ** server can't... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: smazshah
1 Replies
BIND(2) 						      BSD System Calls Manual							   BIND(2)

NAME
bind -- bind a name to a socket LIBRARY
Standard C Library (libc, -lc) SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/socket.h> int bind(int s, const struct sockaddr *name, socklen_t namelen); DESCRIPTION
bind() assigns a name to an unnamed socket. When a socket is created with socket(2) it exists in a name space (address family) but has no name assigned. bind() requests that name be assigned to the socket. namelen indicates the amount of space pointed to by name, in bytes. NOTES
Binding a name in the UNIX domain creates a socket in the file system that must be deleted by the caller when it is no longer needed (using unlink(2)). The rules used in name binding vary between communication domains. Consult the manual entries in section 4 for detailed information. RETURN VALUES
If the bind is successful, a 0 value is returned. A return value of -1 indicates an error, which is further specified in the global errno. ERRORS
The bind() call will fail if: [EBADF] s is not a valid descriptor. [ENOTSOCK] s is not a socket. [EADDRNOTAVAIL] The specified address is not available from the local machine. [EADDRINUSE] The specified address is already in use. [EINVAL] The socket is already bound to an address. [EINVAL] The family of the socket and that requested in name->sa_family are not equivalent. [EACCES] The requested address is protected, and the current user has inadequate permission to access it. [EFAULT] The name parameter is not in a valid part of the user address space. The following errors are specific to binding names in the UNIX domain. [ENOTDIR] A component of the path prefix is not a directory. [ENAMETOOLONG] A component of a pathname exceeded {NAME_MAX} characters, or an entire path name exceeded {PATH_MAX} characters. [ENOENT] A prefix component of the path name does not exist. [ELOOP] Too many symbolic links were encountered in translating the pathname. [EIO] An I/O error occurred while making the directory entry or allocating the inode. [EROFS] The name would reside on a read-only file system. [EISDIR] An empty pathname was specified. SEE ALSO
connect(2), getsockname(2), listen(2), socket(2) HISTORY
The bind() function call appeared in 4.2BSD. SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS
bind() was changed in NetBSD 1.4 to prevent the binding of a socket to the same port as an existing socket when all of the following is true: o either of the existing or new addresses is INADDR_ANY, o the uid of the new socket is not root, and the uids of the creators of the sockets are different, o the address is not a multicast address, and o both sockets are not bound to INADDR_ANY with SO_REUSEPORT set. This prevents an attack where a user could bind to a port with the host's IP address (after setting SO_REUSEADDR) and 'steal' packets des- tined for a server that bound to the same port with INADDR_ANY. bind() was changed in NetBSD 4.0 to honor the user's umask when binding sockets in the local domain. This was done to match the behavior of other operating systems, including FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and Linux, and to improve compatibility with some third-party software. Please note that this behavior is not portable. If you must bind a local socket in a portable and secure way, you need to make a directory with tight permissions and then create the socket inside it. BSD
August 30, 2005 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy