Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers make command failed for target 'obj/gp_unix.o' Post 302223954 by rosalina on Tuesday 12th of August 2008 12:13:06 AM
Old 08-12-2008
make command failed for target 'obj/gp_unix.o'

hi,
i am trying to run make command in solaris 9.
its giving the error:
make:Fatal error:Command failed for target 'obj/gp_unix.o'

i came to know X11 should be inastalled for gp_unix.o.But it is already installed.still the same error.
./configure worked fine.

can anybody please suggest me how should i proceed?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. AIX

big brother monitoring tool - make failed

Hi, Does anyone has installed bb on a unix system ? I am trying to install bb on aix 5.3 but I have the following message: If someone can help me probably there is a tool that I need to install ? I don't have C compiler I install gcc instead and gcc++ etc ... bb:/home/bb/bb1.9g-btf/src/ $ make... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: touny
0 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Solaris 9: make: Fatal error:Command failed for target

Hi everyone first of all you should know that I've been working with solaris for a few days only. :) I need to install some programs and I have had the following troubles: 1. When I used /.configure it showed the following message: "no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH" I included... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: eldiego
2 Replies

3. Solaris

Fatal error: Command failed for target `build_crypto'

Dear brothers. i tried so many times to install openssl-0.9.8g in x86 machine. i have done ./config without any error notification. when i execute the make command i am having the same error fatal error: Command failed for target `build_crypto'. i installed c compiler the verson of... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sayed_021
1 Replies

4. Linux

make file_Configuration lookup disabled for target.

hello everyone, while i am compiling a c++ module.at the compilation end i am getting the following error. ======================= Configuration lookup disabled for target"/swtemp/usbs/cc/unix-ce/root/subsys/cb/cdbc/obj_0001/HP-UX//rdr_types.h" what does it mean.can somebody clarify the... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: mannam srinivas
0 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

make Fatal error: Command failed for target 'exp_inter.o'

I am trying to install Expect 5.43 on my Solaris 10 x86 PC. When I run the make file I get - Command failed for target 'exp_inter.o'. I tried to find the file (find / -name exp_inter.o -print 2>/dev/null) but could not. Where can I get this file from? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: pazzy
2 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Make - two target produced by one recipe

Suppose executable X produces files A and B from nothing, Y produces C from A, Z produces D from B, and my final goal is to produce C and D. I wrote the following makefile: .PHONY: all all: C D C: A Y A D: B Z B A B: X This makefile seems to reflect all dependencies, as it should... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ybelenky
2 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

make - two wildcards in the target

Suppose I have a Makefile like this: x/Ax: x/Bx touch x/Ax y/Ay: y/By touch y/Ay z/Az: z/Bz touch z/Az It does not look like a proper style for make. I would like to write something like %/A%: %/B% touch %/A% but make does not accept it. What is a right way to shorten such a... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ybelenky
1 Replies

8. Programming

Issue with make, no rule to make target etc.

I have been trying to split up my src directory to clear out files that are not re-compiled very often. Now I have the following setup in my trunk, trunk/bld trunk/src/ trunk/src/src_server trunk/makefile.linux In the make file, I have compile rules SOURCELOC = src # compile src c++... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: LMHmedchem
4 Replies

9. Programming

Makefile No rule to make target

I am trying to create a makefile to build a program and am getting the following error: make -f tsimplex.mk make: *** No rule to make target `/main/tsimplex_main.cpp', needed by `tsimplex_main.o'. Stop. OPSYS = $(shell uname -s ) TARGET = tsimplex ROOTDIR = ../../.. GTSDIR =... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kristinu
1 Replies

10. Solaris

Command failed for target 'check-recursive' error

Sorry if this is the wrong place for this. I haven't done UNIX Admin in a long time and am trying to update the utilities on a Solaris server so that I can get Apache 2.4.25 installed. I am finding a lot of utilities that are just too far out of date and some versions are no longer supported. So... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: PJ_Namias
0 Replies
Test::Fatal(3)						User Contributed Perl Documentation					    Test::Fatal(3)

NAME
Test::Fatal - incredibly simple helpers for testing code with exceptions VERSION
version 0.013 SYNOPSIS
use Test::More; use Test::Fatal; use System::Under::Test qw(might_die); is( exception { might_die; }, undef, "the code lived", ); like( exception { might_die; }, qr/turns out it died/, "the code died as expected", ); isa_ok( exception { might_die; }, 'Exception::Whatever', 'the thrown exception', ); DESCRIPTION
Test::Fatal is an alternative to the popular Test::Exception. It does much less, but should allow greater flexibility in testing exception-throwing code with about the same amount of typing. It exports one routine by default: "exception". FUNCTIONS
exception my $exception = exception { ... }; "exception" takes a bare block of code and returns the exception thrown by that block. If no exception was thrown, it returns undef. Achtung! If the block results in a false exception, such as 0 or the empty string, Test::Fatal itself will die. Since either of these cases indicates a serious problem with the system under testing, this behavior is considered a feature. If you must test for these conditions, you should use Try::Tiny's try/catch mechanism. (Try::Tiny is the underlying exception handling system of Test::Fatal.) Note that there is no TAP assert being performed. In other words, no "ok" or "not ok" line is emitted. It's up to you to use the rest of "exception" in an existing test like "ok", "isa_ok", "is", et cetera. Or you may wish to use the "dies_ok" and "lives_ok" wrappers, which do provide TAP output. "exception" does not alter the stack presented to the called block, meaning that if the exception returned has a stack trace, it will include some frames between the code calling "exception" and the thing throwing the exception. This is considered a feature because it avoids the occasionally twitchy "Sub::Uplevel" mechanism. Achtung! This is not a great idea: sub exception_like(&$;$) { my ($code, $pattern, $name) = @_; like( &exception($code), $pattern, $name ); } exception_like(sub { }, qr/foo/, 'foo appears in the exception'); If the code in the "..." is going to throw a stack trace with the arguments to each subroutine in its call stack (for example via "Carp::confess", the test name, "foo appears in the exception" will itself be matched by the regex. Instead, write this: like( exception { ... }, qr/foo/, 'foo appears in the exception' ); Achtung: One final bad idea: isnt( exception { ... }, undef, "my code died!"); It's true that this tests that your code died, but you should really test that it died for the right reason. For example, if you make an unrelated mistake in the block, like using the wrong dereference, your test will pass even though the code to be tested isn't really run at all. If you're expecting an inspectable exception with an identifier or class, test that. If you're expecting a string exception, consider using "like". success try { should_live; } catch { fail("boo, we died"); } success { pass("hooray, we lived"); }; "success", exported only by request, is a Try::Tiny helper with semantics identical to "finally", but the body of the block will only be run if the "try" block ran without error. Although almost any needed exception tests can be performed with "exception", success blocks may sometimes help organize complex testing. dies_ok lives_ok Exported only by request, these two functions run a given block of code, and provide TAP output indicating if it did, or did not throw an exception. These provide an easy upgrade path for replacing existing unit tests based on "Test::Exception". RJBS does not suggest using this except as a convenience while porting tests to use Test::Fatal's "exception" routine. use Test::More tests => 2; use Test::Fatal qw(dies_ok lives_ok); dies_ok { die "I failed" } 'code that fails'; lives_ok { return "I'm still alive" } 'code that does not fail'; AUTHOR
Ricardo Signes <rjbs@cpan.org> COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
This software is copyright (c) 2010 by Ricardo Signes. This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system itself. perl v5.18.2 2013-09-23 Test::Fatal(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy