Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Ownership problem using a CIFS-mounted volume Post 302218254 by mph on Thursday 24th of July 2008 08:09:10 PM
Old 07-24-2008
No, well that depends on the permissions on the local and remote server.
If you have wrx on both machines for the directories involved, then you don't need root
access. You would use your login in place of 'root'. What I gave you there was the very
least in variables, code, and configuration for multiple machines.

See what you can come up with on your own. I'll be more than happy to post a bit more of
what I have and the logic behind it as needed.

MPH
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Stubborn file ownership problem! Argh!

Hi, I have Apache running well on a Linux server, with Samba installed. I do must of my work in Notepad2 on a Windows box using Samba shares on which I am logged in as a user on the box (non-root). I recently decided to expand into cgi-perl. My /htdocs/cgi-bin directory is already part of a... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: questor
0 Replies

2. Linux

files ownership/permission problem

all the files and directories in my system are owned by root only.i try to(from root loggin) change the permission on the file but not permitted.can any one help to fix my problem .also while installing any software always error occur like no makefile available (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jop
1 Replies

3. AIX

CIFS Mount Problem in AIX 5.3 TL12 SP-01-1016

Hi all, We are experiencing below mentioned error on mounting windows Share on AIX 5.3 when we migrate our TL from 8 to TL12-SP01, we also checked the allowed password length for mounting CIFS which is fine(10 characters in our case). On IBM fix central site there is a fix IZ63140 for... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: m_raheelahmed
10 Replies

4. AIX

I/O speed to CIFS mounted Windows Share

I have an AIX box that mounts a Windows share across subnets. When I try to copy a 100 MB file to it, it copies around 2 MB/s. If I copy to another Windows share on the same subnet it copies around 12 MB/s. All I have is gigabit networks so I would expect it to go well over 12 MB/s, which is the... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: kah00na
8 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Directory / File changes on CIFS share mounted on Red Hat Linux

I have a requirement to copy the changed file on CIFS share mounted on Red Hat Linux to a remote FTP/SFTP server. I tried inotify-tools, but this didn't track the modified files. Has anyone tried incron or any other suggestion? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: SupeAlok
1 Replies

6. Red Hat

Permissions problem with cifs.mount

hi, I have the following permission problems with cifs.mount : a share on a VNXe (EMC NAS) is accessed by two RHEL 5.9 accounts (authenticated by Active Directory); One account has read+wite permission to the share , the second one has only read permission. Both accounts uses the following... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Zarake
0 Replies

7. Solaris

In Solaries 10 how to mount multiple volume on same mounted point

Hi , I am completely stuck and not getting any clue to come out this . So looking for help Q : I have salaries 10 in server with that Dell Equallogic storage connected. in dell Equlalogic in i have 70 TB storage . I created 7 volumes 10 TB each . In Solaries 10 i have syslog server i... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Roahn Tiwari
1 Replies

8. Linux

Volume is mounted on two ServiceGuard nodes

Hey! I'm running a HP ServiceGuard cluster with three nodes. One of the packages was moved (not by me) from one node to another a few weeks ago. I just noticed that one of the volume groups is still mounted on the old node. Oops! When I run df, less space is used on the old node than the new. ... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: tobiasvl
0 Replies

9. AIX

AIX 6.1 : Problem with cifs and win2012.

i want to connect a shared folder on a server w2k12 by cifs "mkcifsmnt", but without sucess, i tried to do the same on w2k3, it works, but both on win7 and w2k12 doesn't work, is there any suggestions about this problem, thks in advance. My aix version is 6.1 (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: aouiti
3 Replies
HOSTS.EQUIV(5)						      BSD File Formats Manual						    HOSTS.EQUIV(5)

NAME
hosts.equiv, .rhosts -- trusted remote hosts and host-user pairs DESCRIPTION
The hosts.equiv and .rhosts files list hosts and users which are ``trusted'' by the local host when a connection is made via rlogind(8), rshd(8), or any other server that uses ruserok(3). This mechanism bypasses password checks, and is required for access via rsh(1). Each line of these files has the format: hostname [username] The hostname may be specified as a host name (typically a fully qualified host name in a DNS environment) or address, +@netgroup (from which only the host names are checked), or a ``+'' wildcard (allow all hosts). The username, if specified, may be given as a user name on the remote host, +@netgroup (from which only the user names are checked), or a ``+'' wildcard (allow all remote users). If a username is specified, only that user from the specified host may login to the local machine. If a username is not specified, any user may login with the same user name. EXAMPLES
somehost A common usage: users on somehost may login to the local host as the same user name. somehost username The user username on somehost may login to the local host. If specified in /etc/hosts.equiv, the user may login with only the same user name. +@anetgroup username The user username may login to the local host from any machine listed in the netgroup anetgroup. + + + Two severe security hazards. In the first case, allows a user on any machine to login to the local host as the same user name. In the second case, allows any user on any machine to login to the local host (as any user, if in /etc/hosts.equiv). WARNINGS
The username checks provided by this mechanism are not secure, as the remote user name is received by the server unchecked for validity. Therefore this mechanism should only be used in an environment where all hosts are completely trusted. A numeric host address instead of a host name can help security considerations somewhat; the address is then used directly by iruserok(3). When a username (or netgroup, or +) is specified in /etc/hosts.equiv, that user (or group of users, or all users, respectively) may login to the local host as any local user. Usernames in /etc/hosts.equiv should therefore be used with extreme caution, or not at all. A .rhosts file must be owned by the user whose home directory it resides in, and must be writable only by that user. Logins as root only check root's .rhosts file; the /etc/hosts.equiv file is not checked for security. Access permitted through root's .rhosts file is typically only for rsh(1), as root must still login on the console for an interactive login such as rlogin(1). FILES
/etc/hosts.equiv Global trusted host-user pairs list ~/.rhosts Per-user trusted host-user pairs list SEE ALSO
rcp(1), rlogin(1), rsh(1), rcmd(3), ruserok(3), netgroup(5) HISTORY
The .rhosts file format appeared in 4.2BSD. BUGS
The ruserok(3) implementation currently skips negative entries (preceded with a ``-'' sign) and does not treat them as ``short-circuit'' neg- ative entries. BSD
November 26, 1997 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy