05-08-2008
Thanks!
Hi Zarnick,
So, you mean that when I overwrite the return instruction pointer on the procedure stack I should receive a SegFault, but if I don't reach it I don't? and why not 2 bytes aren't enough??
Sorry, I don't want to be annoying!
Thanks!!
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
hello all,
I tried a program on an array to intialise array elements from the standard input device.it is an integer array of 5 elements.but after entering the 4th element it throws a message called "Segmentation Fault" and returns to the command prompt without asking for the 5th element.
... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: compbug
3 Replies
2. Programming
I have written a program which takes a directory as command line arguments and displays all the dir and files in it.
I don't know why I have a problem with the /etc directory.It displays all the directories and files untill it reaches a sub directory called peers which is in /etc/ppp/peers.the... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: vijlak
4 Replies
3. Programming
ive written my code in C for implementation of a simple lexical analyser using singly linked list hence am making use of dynamic allocation,but when run in linux it gives a segmentation fault is it cause of the malloc function that ive made use of????any suggestions as to what i could do???
thank... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: rockgal
8 Replies
4. AIX
Hi ,
During execution a backup binary i get following error
"Program error 11 (Segmentation fault), saving core file in '/usr/datatools"
Riyaz (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: rshaikh
2 Replies
5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi,
While comparing primary key data of two tables thr bteq script I am getting this Error. This script is a shell script.
*** Error: The following error was encountered on the output file.
Script.sh: 3043492 Segmentation fault(coredump)
Please let me know how to get through it.
... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: monika
5 Replies
6. Programming
Hi,
I am having this segmentation fault not in the following program, bt. in my lab program . My lab program is horrible long so cannot post it here bt. I am using the following logic in my program which is giving the segmentation fault. Bt. if I run this sample program as it is it dosen't give... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mind@work
3 Replies
7. Programming
I use a binary name (ie polo) it gets some parameter , so for debugging normally i do this :
i wrote script for watchdog my app (polo) and check every second if it's not running then start it , the problem is , if my app , remain in state of segmentation fault for a while (ie 15 ... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: pooyair
6 Replies
8. Homework & Coursework Questions
this is a network programming code to run a rock paper scissors in a client and server.
I completed it and it was working without any error. After I added the findWinner function to the server code it starts giving me segmentation fault.
-the segmentation fault is fixed
Current problem -Also... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: femchi
3 Replies
9. Programming
I keep getting this fault on a lot of the codes I write, I'm not exactly sure why so I'd really appreciate it if someone could explain the idea to me.
For example this code
#include <stdio.h>
main()
{
unsigned long a=0;
unsigned long b=0;
int z;
{
printf("Enter two... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sizzler786
2 Replies
10. Programming
Oddities with gcc, 2.95.3 for the AMIGA and 4.2.1 for MY current OSX 10.14.1...
I am creating a basic calculator for the AMIGA ADE *NIX emulator in C as it does not have one.
Below are two very condensed snippets of which I have added the results inside the each code section.
IMPORTANT!... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: wisecracker
11 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
potool
POTOOL(1) General Commands Manual POTOOL(1)
NAME
potool - program for manipulating gettext po files
SYNOPSIS
potool FILENAME1 [ FILENAME2 ] [-f f|nf|t|nt|nth|o|no] [-n ctxt|id|str|cmt|ucmt|pcmt|scmt|dcmt|tr|linf]... [-s] [-c]
potool -h
DESCRIPTION
potool works in two (so far) modes. The first mode requires providing one file name, and works as a filter. In the second mode, the program
replaces the translations in FILENAME1 with the translations from FILENAME2. (So FILENAME1 is the base po file, while FILENAME2 is our
working copy.)
OPTIONS
-f filter
Determines which po file entries should be retained. In the second mode, the filters are applied only to FILENAME2 (the working
copy). Existing filters are:
t - translated entries
nt - untranslated entries
nth - untranslated entries and the header
f - fuzzy entries
nf - entries that are not fuzzy
o - obsolete entries
no - non-obsolete entries
It is possible to stack filters, by specifying multiple -f options.
-n filter
Determines which po file entries parts should not be retained. Any number of -n options is allowed. Valid parameters are:
ctxt - don't write 'ctxt' parts
id - don't write 'id' parts
str - don't write 'str' parts
tr - don't write translations
ucmt - don't write user's comments
pcmt - don't write the comments regarding position in source files
scmt - don't write special comments ('#, fuzzy, c-format, ...')
dcmt - don't write reserved comments (usually starting with a dot)
cmt - don't write any comments
linf - change source line numbers to '1'.
The last parameter is useful when you need to compare two po or pot files using diff(1) as it usually returns lots of unimportant
line number changes otherwise.
-s Don't display the entries themselves, only their count.
-c Overwrite all msgstrs with their msgids.
-h Display short usage help.
EXAMPLES
potool x.po -s -ft
displays the number of translated entries. See also postats(1).
potool x.po -nstr
Deletes all translations - so you can start from scratch! :-)
potool x.po -ft && potool x.po -fnt
displays firstly the translated and then the non-translated entries from file x.po (reverse order is not recommended because of the
first "header" entry). The output contains all information from x.po, with the difference that untranslated entries are located
together in a single place.
potool x.po -fnt > tmp.po && editor tmp.po && potool x.po tmp.po
lets you easily add new translations, without looking at the already translated entries
The last two examples are implemented as the potooledit(1) program.
SEE ALSO
potooledit(1), postats(1), msgmerge(1), msgfmt(1).
AUTHOR
Potool was written by Zbigniew Chyla and is now being maintained by Marcin Owsiany <porridge@debian.org>.
September 21, 2007 POTOOL(1)