03-01-2008
Solaris x86 - multiple problems
Recently installed a custom PC with Solaris 10 u4, kernelpatch 127112-10.
I was going to use this box as a NAT router using ipf. ipf however caused the box to panic multiple times. This in turn lead to a couple other issues that I would like some input of.
- None of the panic's i've experienced forced the box to reboot. It got stuck in some strange state without monitor signal. The only workaround was reset/powercycle. Strangely enough, after ipf related panics the machine was responding to ping.
- After panic's, my / filesystem didn't pass fsck even though my / fs was logging. Running fsck got really messy, a lot of errors - at one time I even experienced a UFS related panic after reboot/fsck.
- The boot-archive problems after panics. Never really got recovery of the boot-archive to work. I followed the instructions after booting safe mode: mount the boot-disk (one side of the disksuite-mirror), updated the boot-archive. Still complained after reboot.
- On recent reboots, fsck complained that there were problems with the /-filesystem, but it still mounted / and continued on with the boot - UFS panic when trying to logon.
- After the last panic and boot-archive update, I was unable to boot at all. Complained about trying to read blocks outside boot-area or similar. Never tried to recover from here, at this stage I decided to reinstall the box since even if managing to fix the bootaarchive, the state of the / fs seems to be very dodgy.
- When booting in safe-mode to fix fsck problems with root, md-devices are not started and / was mounted ro from one side of the mirror (regardless of booting safemode from HD or DVD). Is there a best practice or decent workaround for doing fsck on the md-device for root at this stage?
Have any of you experienced similar oddities, esp. the filesystem errors after panic even though using UFS logging? What can be the cause of such problems? I shouldn't rule out HW/SATA controller problems (even though I doubt it) or similar, anything else?
The problem of not rebooting after panic, can that also be HW related? Some special measures to take on x86 platforms (custom pc hw) to force reboot on panic?
Anyone been running IPF as a NAT router without problems? I used the freeware ipf on Solaris 9/sparc previously and that was very stable apart from when using VPN passthrough which always panic:ed the box after a while. Saw the exact same behaviour in Solaris ipf now but this one also panics without without VPN (I applied the latest ipf-patch)
Not used to Solaris on x86, any pointers welcome!
Thanks
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi There,
I search a lot across the board but didn't find answer... first of all... I installed the Companion CD. So Kde is supposed to work... I ran the script to have it in my login screen, and it's there... but when I enter it, it only kicks me to the login screen once... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Erythro73
1 Replies
2. Solaris
hi,
need help!
i've installed solaris 9 on my x86 box...problems with kdmconfig. here what i have:
1- Dell 17" Flat monitor ( 31kHz-80kHz horizontal and 56 Hz-76Hz Vertical)
2- Matrox Millenium G550 card
what choices do i have to made?
best regards
thank you in advance (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: hmaiida
1 Replies
3. Solaris
Have a compaq dl380 proliant installed with solaris..
It has a smart array 5i controller.. currently I have 2 18gb disks - mirrored as far as I can see...
I have just put in 2 36gb disks (just physically put in)
How do I get solaris to recognise them so I can use them?
format command - only... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: frustrated1
2 Replies
4. Solaris
Ok here goes, this MCSE is now fed up with MS, they are telling me that my Legal XP has a s/num they didnt issue.
After countless emails I am P with them and am loooking for a new OS.
Tried Linux, got it working but seems too flaky for me.
Have installed Solaris 10 X86 (on a temp pc AMD Athlon... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mickie
1 Replies
5. Solaris
I tried installing Solaris 10 (x86) 01/06 on a VMWARE machine.
Installation went on pretty smoothly for CD 1 but I seem to have problem installing the rest of the CDs.
I have a few questions to ask:
After installing CD 1, I was prompted to reboot, when the system rebooted, I was back at the... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: owls
3 Replies
6. Solaris
OK, I have a DELL Poweredge 2850 fresh out of the box sitting here.
I'm thinking of putting Solaris 9 x86 on it.
Has anyone ever attempted this before, do you think it will work?
I dont want to get into something that is just going to be a enormus waste of time, so I am wondering if anyone... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: BG_JrAdmin
1 Replies
7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I know that Sun make s a version of Solaris for Sparc platforms and also an x86 (Intel/AMD) release of Solaris. Can an application that runs on Solaris/Sparc also run on a PC running the x86 release of Solaris? Would a different release be required or any re-compling of the application?
jim (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: stocksj
1 Replies
8. Emergency UNIX and Linux Support
Hi all,
I have unbootable Solaris 10 x86 installed on ZFS root file system. on an IDE HDD
The bios keep showing the msg
DISK BOOT FAILURE , PLEASE INSERT SYSTEM BOOT DISK
please note : the HDD is connected properly and recognized by the system
is there any guide to recover the system ,... (67 Replies)
Discussion started by: h@foorsa.biz
67 Replies
9. Solaris
Hi,
I am facing an issue with Solaris x86 machine
Machine Details:
uname -a
SunOS sol10-64 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
..............................
Description:
I am trying to register a programm with proramm ID 300760 with version number 1, and tryint to create a... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: DivakarAdari
0 Replies
10. Solaris
Dear All,
I have been trying to move my existing Solaris Installation (x86, 10/08) to a bigger HDD.
So I created a 22 cylinder boot partition and used the rest of the space for a Solaris2 partition. Then I created slices same size like on my current disk.
I copied all files with cpio and... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: BigT79
3 Replies
LEARN ABOUT FREEBSD
systemd-fsck
SYSTEMD-FSCK@.SERVICE(8) systemd-fsck@.service SYSTEMD-FSCK@.SERVICE(8)
NAME
systemd-fsck@.service, systemd-fsck-root.service, systemd-fsck - File system checker logic
SYNOPSIS
systemd-fsck@.service
systemd-fsck-root.service
/lib/systemd/systemd-fsck
DESCRIPTION
systemd-fsck@.service and systemd-fsck-root.service are services responsible for file system checks. They are instantiated for each device
that is configured for file system checking. systemd-fsck-root.service is responsible for file system checks on the root file system, but
only if the root filesystem was not checked in the initramfs. systemd-fsck@.service is used for all other file systems and for the root
file system in the initramfs.
These services are started at boot if passno in /etc/fstab for the file system is set to a value greater than zero. The file system check
for root is performed before the other file systems. Other file systems may be checked in parallel, except when they are on the same
rotating disk.
systemd-fsck does not know any details about specific filesystems, and simply executes file system checkers specific to each filesystem
type (/sbin/fsck.*). This helper will decide if the filesystem should actually be checked based on the time since last check, number of
mounts, unclean unmount, etc.
If a file system check fails for a service without nofail, emergency mode is activated, by isolating to emergency.target.
KERNEL COMMAND LINE
systemd-fsck understands these kernel command line parameters:
fsck.mode=
One of "auto", "force", "skip". Controls the mode of operation. The default is "auto", and ensures that file system checks are done
when the file system checker deems them necessary. "force" unconditionally results in full file system checks. "skip" skips any file
system checks.
fsck.repair=
One of "preen", "yes", "no". Controls the mode of operation. The default is "preen", and will automatically repair problems that can be
safely fixed. "yes" will answer yes to all questions by fsck and "no" will answer no to all questions.
SEE ALSO
systemd(1), fsck(8), systemd-quotacheck.service(8), fsck.btrfs(8), fsck.cramfs(8), fsck.ext4(8), fsck.fat(8), fsck.hfsplus(8),
fsck.minix(8), fsck.ntfs(8), fsck.xfs(8)
systemd 237 SYSTEMD-FSCK@.SERVICE(8)