Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users How to attach an xterm to a process/thread ? Post 302168126 by cadanir on Sunday 17th of February 2008 07:04:44 AM
Old 02-17-2008
From your description, it's difficult to know if U program in C, XWindow, or scripting in Perl, ksh or dtksh... but maybe the easiest way is to use named pipes.

Simply creates your named pipes and read/write to them from any process or thread...

For example, main process creates 5 threads, each thread create his named pipe and write data to his named pipe, main process then creates 5 xterm process reading and printing each named pipes...

Also, if the data is not volatile, threads can write data to regular files and xterm processes could read them continuously like 'tail -f'...

We are limited just by our imagination... depending on the task to do, U can use shared memory, memory mapped files, message queues, database, indexed files, etc...
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

List of Thread IDs of a process

Hello, Can some one tell how to read the thread IDs of the current process in Sun Solaris. Any help will be appreciated. regards, Murali (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: hmurali
0 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

get Thread information from process

Hello all im trying to build small script in tcsh that will monitor some process that are making some api calles to some server . first of all im trying to find way to see how many threads each process is using , and else how can i print each Thread id . can it be done ? ( using sunOs ) (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: umen
2 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

[BASH] xclock/xcalc/xterm...process question?

I have no idea how to do this: Let's say the user opens an "xclock &" in one of my scripts and I don't want him to be able to re-open one with the script. How could I test that? Possibly with a message saying that "The <xclock(or w/e other process like xcalc)> is already running in the... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Yakuzan
3 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

attach process from another ssh session

Hi, I was logged in on a server, by ssh, with a vim open, when the battery of my laptop got empty. When I return to the server by ssh, I can see my previous ssh session still open, and the vim process running (ttyp0). Is there a way to attach that vim to my new session (ttyp4)? Here's part... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: raphinou
2 Replies

5. Programming

Need the PID of a process in a thread

How do I run a process from a C++ p_thread and obtain its PID? Right now I am doing in a p_thread: system("ampl method.run"); and into the main function (after running the thread mentioned before): sleep(5); //Just to be sure that the thread is executing the ampl command system("ps... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: riccollado
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

process and thread

i want to know a difference between process and thread,give a program to tell the difference (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: annapurna konga
2 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Thread count for a process id

Hi, I want to know a command/program to get thread count for a process id in unix box. Please help me in this regard. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: manaac
1 Replies

8. Programming

dbx - attach to process, break when crash

Hey everyone, I have a process that is crashing, and I'd like to have some way to see where it crashes. Is this possible? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ctote
2 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Get the process/thread running on which core

I use top -H -p 1256 to show process 1256, and then press "f" then press "j" to display it is running on which core, is there a better mothed, I want to be automated to get this (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: yanglei_fage
1 Replies

10. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Attach process with port 2222

Hi Team, is there any way, I can start any process for e.g. run a shell script (infinite loop) and attach it to port 2222? I am trying to create a scenario where an application will start running at port 2222 and I will telnet the same to confirm, application port is listening. So,... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vivekpandit7
1 Replies
PIPE(7) 						     Linux Programmer's Manual							   PIPE(7)

NAME
pipe - overview of pipes and FIFOs DESCRIPTION
Pipes and FIFOs (also known as named pipes) provide a unidirectional interprocess communication channel. A pipe has a read end and a write end. Data written to the write end of a pipe can be read from the read end of the pipe. A pipe is created using pipe(2), which creates a new pipe and returns two file descriptors, one referring to the read end of the pipe, the other referring to the write end. Pipes can be used to create a communication channel between related processes; see pipe(2) for an exam- ple. A FIFO (short for First In First Out) has a name within the file system (created using mkfifo(3)), and is opened using open(2). Any process may open a FIFO, assuming the file permissions allow it. The read end is opened using the O_RDONLY flag; the write end is opened using the O_WRONLY flag. See fifo(7) for further details. Note: although FIFOs have a pathname in the file system, I/O on FIFOs does not involve operations on the underlying device (if there is one). I/O on Pipes and FIFOs The only difference between pipes and FIFOs is the manner in which they are created and opened. Once these tasks have been accomplished, I/O on pipes and FIFOs has exactly the same semantics. If a process attempts to read from an empty pipe, then read(2) will block until data is available. If a process attempts to write to a full pipe (see below), then write(2) blocks until sufficient data has been read from the pipe to allow the write to complete. Nonblocking I/O is possible by using the fcntl(2) F_SETFL operation to enable the O_NONBLOCK open file status flag. The communication channel provided by a pipe is a byte stream: there is no concept of message boundaries. If all file descriptors referring to the write end of a pipe have been closed, then an attempt to read(2) from the pipe will see end-of- file (read(2) will return 0). If all file descriptors referring to the read end of a pipe have been closed, then a write(2) will cause a SIGPIPE signal to be generated for the calling process. If the calling process is ignoring this signal, then write(2) fails with the error EPIPE. An application that uses pipe(2) and fork(2) should use suitable close(2) calls to close unnecessary duplicate file descriptors; this ensures that end-of-file and SIGPIPE/EPIPE are delivered when appropriate. It is not possible to apply lseek(2) to a pipe. Pipe Capacity A pipe has a limited capacity. If the pipe is full, then a write(2) will block or fail, depending on whether the O_NONBLOCK flag is set (see below). Different implementations have different limits for the pipe capacity. Applications should not rely on a particular capac- ity: an application should be designed so that a reading process consumes data as soon as it is available, so that a writing process does not remain blocked. In Linux versions before 2.6.11, the capacity of a pipe was the same as the system page size (e.g., 4096 bytes on i386). Since Linux 2.6.11, the pipe capacity is 65536 bytes. PIPE_BUF POSIX.1-2001 says that write(2)s of less than PIPE_BUF bytes must be atomic: the output data is written to the pipe as a contiguous sequence. Writes of more than PIPE_BUF bytes may be nonatomic: the kernel may interleave the data with data written by other processes. POSIX.1-2001 requires PIPE_BUF to be at least 512 bytes. (On Linux, PIPE_BUF is 4096 bytes.) The precise semantics depend on whether the file descriptor is nonblocking (O_NONBLOCK), whether there are multiple writers to the pipe, and on n, the number of bytes to be written: O_NONBLOCK disabled, n <= PIPE_BUF All n bytes are written atomically; write(2) may block if there is not room for n bytes to be written immediately O_NONBLOCK enabled, n <= PIPE_BUF If there is room to write n bytes to the pipe, then write(2) succeeds immediately, writing all n bytes; otherwise write(2) fails, with errno set to EAGAIN. O_NONBLOCK disabled, n > PIPE_BUF The write is nonatomic: the data given to write(2) may be interleaved with write(2)s by other process; the write(2) blocks until n bytes have been written. O_NONBLOCK enabled, n > PIPE_BUF If the pipe is full, then write(2) fails, with errno set to EAGAIN. Otherwise, from 1 to n bytes may be written (i.e., a "partial write" may occur; the caller should check the return value from write(2) to see how many bytes were actually written), and these bytes may be interleaved with writes by other processes. Open File Status Flags The only open file status flags that can be meaningfully applied to a pipe or FIFO are O_NONBLOCK and O_ASYNC. Setting the O_ASYNC flag for the read end of a pipe causes a signal (SIGIO by default) to be generated when new input becomes available on the pipe (see fcntl(2) for details). On Linux, O_ASYNC is supported for pipes and FIFOs only since kernel 2.6. Portability notes On some systems (but not Linux), pipes are bidirectional: data can be transmitted in both directions between the pipe ends. According to POSIX.1-2001, pipes only need to be unidirectional. Portable applications should avoid reliance on bidirectional pipe semantics. SEE ALSO
dup(2), fcntl(2), open(2), pipe(2), poll(2), select(2), socketpair(2), stat(2), mkfifo(3), epoll(7), fifo(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.25 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2005-12-08 PIPE(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy