02-02-2008
Is this going to have data integrity problem considering SAN is much faster than SSA? And my system is only 4.3.3 with JFS only.
When detaching the SSA disk, the command is reducevg hdisk14. Is that correct?
And there's no conflict for all types of disks whether raid 0,1,5 to be mirrored.
Thanks but need more clarification,
itik
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. SCO
Forgive me, I do not know much about RAID so I'm going to be
as detailed as possible.
This morning, our server's alarm was going. I found that one
of our drives have failed. (we have 3)
It is an Adaptec ATA RAID 2400A controller
I'm purchasing a new SCSI drive today. My questions:
... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: gseyforth
2 Replies
2. Solaris
I have one volume raid5 with 3 slice one of them is maintenance state. I replace this slice and resync the volume. when I try to mount the file system another slice goes to last erred. Again resync and the state goes to OK but the slice in mantenance persist. I try to enabled this but persist in... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: usdsia
2 Replies
3. Filesystems, Disks and Memory
Hello, we have a problem with our system, a machine with a RAID5:
- We can boot the system from CD only, if we try to boot from hard-disk the GRUB seems to be "freezed". What is the difference, why we can boot from CD if something is wrong?
- Allways we retreive an error like: "raid array is... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: aristegui
6 Replies
4. Solaris
I've looked a little but haven't found a solid answer, assuming there is one.
What's better, hardware mirroring or ZFS mirroring? Common practice for us was to use the raid controllers on the Sun x86 servers. Now we've been using ZFS mirroring since U6. Any performance difference? Any other... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Lespaul20
3 Replies
5. Solaris
Hi ,
I am new to SVM .when i try to learn RAID 1 , first they are creating two RAID 0 strips through
metainit d51 1 1 c0t0d0s2
metainit d52 1 1 c1t0d0s2
In the next step
metainit d50 -m d51
d50: Mirror is setup
next step is
metaattach d50 d52
d50 : submirror d52 is... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: vr_mari
7 Replies
6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi there,
Don't know if my title is relevant but I'm dealing with dangerous materials that I don't really know and I'm very afraid to mess anything up.
I have a Debian 5.0.4 server with 4 x 1TB hard drives.
I have the following mdstat
Personalities :
md1 : active raid1 sda1 sdd1... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: chebarbudo
3 Replies
7. SuSE
Hi all,
I am currently using opensuse 12.1,
We have Raid 5 array of 8 disks. A friend of mine accidently removed a drive & place it back and also added a new disk to it(making it 9 disks). now the output of mdadm --detail is as shown below
si64:/dev # mdadm --detail /dev/md3
/dev/md3:... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: patilrajashekar
1 Replies
8. HP-UX
what is the difference between DRD and Root Mirror Disk using LVM mirror ? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: maxim42
3 Replies
9. Hardware
Hello Experts,
I have few doubts on RAID 5 with LUNs carved as STRIPE and CONCAT
RAID 5 = STRIPE + Parity mirroring
I would like to know if the LUNs carved are CONCATE from RAID 5 disk array. Are the I/Os are spread accross the disks within the RAID 5 Array? And if I do carve STRIPED... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sybadm
1 Replies
10. Red Hat
Hi All,
I have a new x3650 M4 server with hardware RAID 5 configured 4 x 300 GB (HDD).
The Raid controller is ServeRAID M5110e.
Im getting "device not found" error during hardisk detection of RHEL6 install using DVD.
Some pages over the net pointed to using ServerGuide media for... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Solaris_Begin
1 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
mkqdisk
mkqdisk(8) Quorum Disk Management mkqdisk(8)
NAME
mkqdisk - Cluster Quorum Disk Utility
WARNING
Use of this command can cause the cluster to malfunction.
SYNOPSIS
mkqdisk [-?|-h] | [-L] | [-f label] [-c device -l label] [-d [-d ...]]
DESCRIPTION
The mkqdisk command is used to create a new quorum disk or display existing quorum disks accessible from a given cluster node.
OPTIONS
-c device -l label
Initialize a new cluster quorum disk. This will destroy all data on the given device. If a cluster is currently using that device
as a quorum disk, the entire cluster will malfunction. Do not run this on an active cluster when qdiskd is running. Only one
device on the SAN should ever have the given label; using multiple different devices is currently not supported (it is expected a
RAID array is used for quorum disk redundancy). The label can be any textual string up to 127 characters - and is therefore enough
space to hold a UUID created with uuidgen(1).
-f label
Find the cluster quorum disk with the given label and display information about it.
-L Display information on all accessible cluster quorum disks.
-d Increase debugging level. Specify multiple times for more information. Currently, specifying more than twice has no effect.
SEE ALSO
qdisk(5), qdiskd(8), uuidgen(1)
July 2006 mkqdisk(8)