Sponsored Content
The Lounge What is on Your Mind? How many has posted over 1000 posts???? Post 302108963 by ahmedwaseem2000 on Thursday 1st of March 2007 11:57:33 PM
Old 03-02-2007
Well, counting over 49000 is a bit too much for me!!!! Can't we have poll to find how many people think what it is???
 

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators

posted twice on same thread..

sorry! accidentally posted the same post twice on a thread.. could you please remove the second .. thanx moxxx68 (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: moxxx68
1 Replies

2. Forum Support Area for Unregistered Users & Account Problems

Posted thread

Hi, I joined yesterday and posted a thread and received emails from people suggesting solutions. My problem is that when I tried to access my posting this morning by clicking on the link in an emial, it said I wasn't registered and I had to re-register and I can't find my posting. The emial I... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: hdixon
1 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Posted a Question Yesterday

Was wondering if it was too stupid and got deleted? Because it's gone now from the board. I was asking about For Loops ----? #!/usr/bin/bash bank=`cat /export/home/usr/banklist.txt` cdir=`cat /export/home/usr/mountlist.txt` for d in $cdir do ls -l /apps/data/custdata/$d/$i/incoming/... (15 Replies)
Discussion started by: xgringo
15 Replies

4. Forum Support Area for Unregistered Users & Account Problems

How to delete a thread I posted

Hi, I posted a new technical question in the wrong forum by mistake. How can I delete this thread? Thanks. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jliharper
1 Replies

5. SCO

List of questions posted

I had a query with regard to the posting of questions on the forum, it is that how do we see the questions that we have posted separately. It should not be that we have to go inside the forum list and search for the question that we had posted. I hope, my question is clear. Please, help in... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ran_sush
1 Replies

6. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators

Spam being posted by user

The second post in this thread is spam. All of the other posts that I looked at by the same user are also spam. https://www.unix.com/shell-programming-scripting/152728-using-grep-returns-partial-matches-i-need-get-exact-match-nothing.html Don't know if the individual reply can be scratched,... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: agama
2 Replies
PCAP_GET_SELECTABLE_FD(3)				     Library Functions Manual					 PCAP_GET_SELECTABLE_FD(3)

NAME
pcap_get_selectable_fd - get a file descriptor on which a select() can be done for a live capture SYNOPSIS
#include <pcap/pcap.h> int pcap_get_selectable_fd(pcap_t *p); DESCRIPTION
pcap_get_selectable_fd() returns, on UNIX, a file descriptor number for a file descriptor on which one can do a select() or poll() to wait for it to be possible to read packets without blocking, if such a descriptor exists, or -1, if no such descriptor exists. Some network devices opened with pcap_create() and pcap_activate(), or with pcap_open_live(), do not support select() or poll() (for example, regular network devices on FreeBSD 4.3 and 4.4, and Endace DAG devices), so -1 is returned for those devices. Note that in: FreeBSD prior to FreeBSD 4.6; NetBSD prior to NetBSD 3.0; OpenBSD prior to OpenBSD 2.4; Mac OS X prior to Mac OS X 10.7; select() and poll() do not work correctly on BPF devices; pcap_get_selectable_fd() will return a file descriptor on most of those versions (the exceptions being FreeBSD 4.3 and 4.4), but a simple select() or poll() will not indicate that the descriptor is readable until a full buffer's worth of packets is received, even if the read timeout expires before then. To work around this, an application that uses select() or poll() to wait for packets to arrive must put the pcap_t in non-blocking mode, and must arrange that the select() or poll() have a timeout less than or equal to the read timeout, and must try to read packets after that timeout expires, regardless of whether select() or poll() indicated that the file descriptor for the pcap_t is ready to be read or not. (That workaround will not work in FreeBSD 4.3 and later; however, in FreeBSD 4.6 and later, select() and poll() work correctly on BPF devices, so the workaround isn't necessary, although it does no harm.) Note also that poll() doesn't work on character special files, including BPF devices, in Mac OS X 10.4 and 10.5, so, while select() can be used on the descriptor returned by pcap_get_selectable_fd(), poll() cannot be used on it those versions of Mac OS X. Kqueues also don't work on that descriptor. poll(), but not kqueues, work on that descriptor in Mac OS X releases prior to 10.4; poll() and kqueues work on that descriptor in Mac OS X 10.6 and later. pcap_get_selectable_fd() is not available on Windows. RETURN VALUE
A selectable file descriptor is returned if one exists; otherwise, -1 is returned. SEE ALSO
pcap(3), select(2), poll(2) 22 July 2011 PCAP_GET_SELECTABLE_FD(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy