Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Another lame 'vi' question...... Post 302088340 by Perderabo on Monday 11th of September 2006 02:41:02 PM
Old 09-11-2006
This would be easier with sed but I got this to work in vim and I think that it will work in plain old vi:

:%s+\(/.*\)=+\1=../..\1 777 user group+

It will certainly work in sed:

sed 's+\(/.*\)=+\1=../..\1 777 user group+' < inputfile > outputfile
 

5 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

lame question

i have one stupid question... so please don't laught at me :-) actually i have linux on my pc, but i want to install a solaris... i heard that solaris is not free, but my friend said that there is a free solaris dostridution in gnu licence... is it real? if yes where can i get it? if no -... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: pgas
4 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

lame php question

When do PHP variables/objects vanish? Say, I have a database structure in index.php, I called connect(). Then I sent the user another page, say index2.php. Should I create a fresh database structure and call connect() again, or is there a way around this? (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: rayne
6 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Delete original wav file if lame was successful encoding.

In a bash script: src=”cooltrack.wav” dst=”cooltrack.mp3” lame $src $dst I would like to add some line that would delete the source wav file like: rm $src but I would like this only if the encoding was successful. What should I include before deleting the original to check that the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Aia
2 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Help with 'batch conversion using lame' shell script

Hi. I am trying to write an sh script that will: 1. take each wav file in ~/Documents 2. convert each into mp3 format using "lame" encoder 3. save the new mp3 in ~/Documents/newmp3s. It has to follow the 3 steps in this order for each wav file before taking the next file. I tried a... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Kingzy
8 Replies

5. What is on Your Mind?

Protocol Jokes (Lame)

I have a UDP joke but i don't know if you will get it: Also, I have a TCP joke and i know you will get it. :) (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: TUX servers
2 Replies
IOPL(2) 						     Linux Programmer's Manual							   IOPL(2)

NAME
iopl - change I/O privilege level SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/io.h> int iopl(int level); DESCRIPTION
iopl changes the I/O privilege level of the current process, as specified in level. This call is necessary to allow 8514-compatible X servers to run under Linux. Since these X servers require access to all 65536 I/O ports, the ioperm call is not sufficient. In addition to granting unrestricted I/O port access, running at a higher I/O privilege level also allows the process to disable inter- rupts. This will probably crash the system, and is not recommended. Permissions are inherited by fork and exec. The I/O privilege level for a normal process is 0. RETURN VALUE
On success, zero is returned. On error, -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately. ERRORS
EINVAL level is greater than 3. EPERM The current user is not the super-user. CONFORMING TO
iopl is Linux specific and should not be used in processes intended to be portable. NOTES
Libc5 treats it as a system call and has a prototype in <unistd.h>. Glibc1 does not have a prototype. Glibc2 has a prototype both in <sys/io.h> and in <sys/perm.h>. Avoid the latter, it is available on i386 only. SEE ALSO
ioperm(2) Linux 0.99.11 1993-07-24 IOPL(2)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy