04-08-2002
It isn't a very dangerous virus, just more of a slight fault but thanks anyway
6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Cybersecurity
How secure are downloads from unix.com, linux.com, etc? Not talking about off the wall individual user sites, but sites like unix.com, download.com, tucows.com? We've been inundated at work lately from viruses, and I want to make sure that for things like work related downloads, that those kind... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: kymberm
5 Replies
2. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions
I had just recently experienced, a bad experience... Apperently, a worm got into my computer a created itself in my MS-DOS. No serious damage was done, but I did a little study on it, through my computer. The virus got thought my scan, by coding itself as an HTML file. Don't know why it did that,... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: hdk_mkr
2 Replies
3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Can anyone explain why generally there are no viruses in Unix.
Do any of the big Anti Virus supplier produce anything for Unix platforms ? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jimthompson
1 Replies
4. Solaris
I know that UNIX is almost untouchable but my server is slower than previous days .
I found out that some users have watched porn on net , could they compromised system security .
So I have 2 questions
1. Has on market any viruses for Solaris
2. How to block some internet sites under... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: solaris_user
1 Replies
5. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hello
I ask you how to make a
Anti-malicious files and viruses
Or if one of you a small example of the work on the same place and I hope my request
I want a small patch or the process of examination Virus
http://www.google.jo/images/cleardot.gif
---------- Post updated... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: x-zer0
1 Replies
6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I am writing a file that will delete a line from all files in a directory.
sed "/#Text_to_be_deleted/d" #files_from_ls >tmp
mv tmp #files_from_ls
For some reason, whenever I test it, it will not delete the line, but it will work if I enter only one file. Is there a way to fix this? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: 62583
3 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
mailgraph
MAILGRAPH(8) System Manager's Manual MAILGRAPH(8)
NAME
mailgraph - daemon which produces graphs of SMTP traffic
SYNOPSIS
mailgraph [ options ]
DESCRIPTION
mailgraph is a daemon which produces mail statistics RRDtool for Postfix and Sendmail. This stats are stored for generating daily, weekly,
monthly and yearly graphs of sent/received/rejected and bounced/viruses/spam mails.
OPTIONS
-h, --help
Display help and exit.
-v, --verbose
Be verbose about what you do.
-V, --version
Output version information and exit.
-c, --cat
Cause the logfile to be only read and not monitored.
-l, --logfile file
Monitor logfile file instead of /var/log/syslog.
-t, --logtype type
Set logfile's type (default: syslog).
-y, --year
Start year of the log file (default: current year).
--host=HOST
Use only entries for HOST (regexp) in syslog.
-d, --daemon
Start in the background
--daemon-pid=FILE
Write PID to FILE instead of /var/run/mailgraph.pid.
--daemon-rrd=DIR
Write RRDs to DIR instead of /var/lib/mailgraph/.
--daemon-log=FILE
Write verbose-log to FILE instead of /var/log/mailgraph.log.
--ignore-localhost
Ignore mail to/from localhost (used for virus scanner).
--ignore-host=HOST
Ignore mail to/from HOST (used for virus scanner).
--no-mail-rrd
Do not update the mail rrd.
--no-virus-rrd
Do not update the virus rrd.
--no-greylist-rrd
Do not update the greylist rrd.
--rrd-name=NAME
Use NAME.rrd, NAME_virus.rrd and NAME_greylist.rrd for the rrd files.
--rbl-is-spam
Count rbl rejects as spam.
--virbl-is-virus
Count virbl rejects as viruses.
SEE ALSO
rrdtool(1), RRDs(3pm)
AUTHOR
David Schweikert <dws@ee.ethz.ch>
MAILGRAPH(8)