Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Solaris How to remove CLOSE_WAIT in Solaris 5.10? Post 302988857 by MadeInGermany on Wednesday 4th of January 2017 03:37:45 AM
Old 01-04-2017
So I would consult Oracle for a solution.
The ndd tuning is a mitigation rather than a solution.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

remove CLOSE_WAIT connections

Hi folks. I have a problem that I need to remove CLOSE_WAIT connections. On AIX version 5.x, I can use rmsock command. Is there a similar command on Solaris ? Is there an other solution for this situation ? Thanks. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Livio
6 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

clear CLOSE_WAIT status

Hi, I have an application with a bug in it that keeps sockets in CLOSE_WAIT, which eventually freezes the server because the user account it runs under runs out of file handles. We have the bug fixed but can only release the fix with the next release. Does anyone know how I can clear the... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: rein
3 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

close_wait connections causing a server to hung

Hi Guys, Just wondering if anyone of you have been in a situation where you end up having around 100 close_wait connections and seems to me those connections are locking up resources/processes in the server so unless the server is rebooted those processes won't be released by the close_wait... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: hariza
3 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Hitting with custom port in CLOSE_WAIT state for long time in solaris 10

Hi, Occasionally I am getting the port state in CLOSE_WAIT for long time in the solaris server. I am not sure is it application problem or not. Because we are using port 9009 for Tomcat process in our web application, some time when I start the application, the port 9009 is in CLOSE_WAIT... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: mgmk.84
0 Replies

5. Solaris

CLOSE_WAIT problem in solaris server

Hi, Occasionally I am getting the port state in CLOSE_WAIT for long time in the solaris server. I am not sure is it application problem or not. Because we are using port 9009 for Tomcat process in our web application, some time when I start the application, the port 9009 is in CLOSE_WAIT... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mgmk.84
2 Replies

6. Solaris

How to remove CLOSE_WAIT in Solaris

Hi, We are using a application which uses port in CLOSE_WAIT Status. netstat -an|grep 9191 192.168.32.11.9191 192.168.32.11.54562 49152 0 49152 0 CLOSE_WAIT 192.168.32.11.9191 192.168.32.11.54564 49152 0 49152 0 CLOSE_WAIT 192.168.32.11.9191 192.168.32.11.54568 ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: helplineinc
2 Replies

7. Red Hat

Too many CLOSE_WAIT connections

Hi, I am running JBOSS 6 ona RHEL5 server put it continuously crashes due to the number of CLOSE_WAIT connections on port 8080. How can I kill the several hundred CLOSE_WAIT connections without killing the actual live "LISTENING" connection? R, D. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Duffs22
2 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

stuck in CLOSE_WAIT Solaris 10 - Patch and workaround

Solaris 10 Sparc: When you got a connection locking a tcp/port, and the status is CLOSE_WAIT (for ever :wall:), you just use the tcpdrop, to close the connection. This is a OS bug. I wrote the bug id bellow: BUG-ID 6468753 connections stuck in CLOSE_WAIT The patch that's correct the bug:... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: thiagofborn
0 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Terminate processes for CLOSE_WAIT status of TCP

Hello Friends, First of all im sorry for spending extra space in DB of forum with this thread, i know there would be a solution if i kept searching, I need to terminate the process which causes CLOSE_WAIT status of TCP connection via port 8103: -bash-3.00$ netstat -na | grep 8103... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: EAGL€
3 Replies

10. AIX

How to repair a TCP/IP socket in state: CLOSE_WAIT?

Hi The clients connect to my server -using port 9130. But no client could connect to my server at this time. I've checked already and this is the result netstat -Aan|grep -v 127.0.0.1|grep 9130|pg f10006000abcb398 tcp4 10313 0 10.0.89.81.9130 10.158.70.24.1705 CLOSE_WAIT... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: bobochacha29
8 Replies
bup-margin(1)						      General Commands Manual						     bup-margin(1)

NAME
bup-margin - figure out your deduplication safety margin SYNOPSIS
bup margin [options...] DESCRIPTION
bup margin iterates through all objects in your bup repository, calculating the largest number of prefix bits shared between any two entries. This number, n, identifies the longest subset of SHA-1 you could use and still encounter a collision between your object ids. For example, one system that was tested had a collection of 11 million objects (70 GB), and bup margin returned 45. That means a 46-bit hash would be sufficient to avoid all collisions among that set of objects; each object in that repository could be uniquely identified by its first 46 bits. The number of bits needed seems to increase by about 1 or 2 for every doubling of the number of objects. Since SHA-1 hashes have 160 bits, that leaves 115 bits of margin. Of course, because SHA-1 hashes are essentially random, it's theoretically possible to use many more bits with far fewer objects. If you're paranoid about the possibility of SHA-1 collisions, you can monitor your repository by running bup margin occasionally to see if you're getting dangerously close to 160 bits. OPTIONS
--predict Guess the offset into each index file where a particular object will appear, and report the maximum deviation of the correct answer from the guess. This is potentially useful for tuning an interpolation search algorithm. --ignore-midx don't use .midx files, use only .idx files. This is only really useful when used with --predict. EXAMPLE
$ bup margin Reading indexes: 100.00% (1612581/1612581), done. 40 40 matching prefix bits 1.94 bits per doubling 120 bits (61.86 doublings) remaining 4.19338e+18 times larger is possible Everyone on earth could have 625878182 data sets like yours, all in one repository, and we would expect 1 object collision. $ bup margin --predict PackIdxList: using 1 index. Reading indexes: 100.00% (1612581/1612581), done. 915 of 1612581 (0.057%) SEE ALSO
bup-midx(1), bup-save(1) BUP
Part of the bup(1) suite. AUTHORS
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>. Bup unknown- bup-margin(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy